SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aronson, S. (1971). The sociology of the telephone. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 12, 153167.
  • Calhoun, C. (1998). Community without propinquity revisited: Communications technology and the transformation of the urban public sphere. Sociological Inquiry, 68(3), 373397.
  • Copher, J. I., Kanfer, A. G., & Walker, M. B. (2002). Everyday communication patterns of heavy and light email users. In B.Wellman & C.Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 263288). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Cowlan, B. (1979). A revolution in personal communications: The explosive growth of citizens band radio. In G.Gumpert & R.Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/Media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 116121). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. W. (1992). The NORC general social survey: A user’s guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307336.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Goldstein, J. R., & Warren, J. R. (2000). Socioeconomic reach and heterogeneity in the extended family: Contours and consequences. Social Science Research, 29(3), 382404.
  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 13601380.
  • Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (2002). The Internet in everyday life: An introduction. In B.Wellman & C.Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 341). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Katz, J. K., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 17521774.
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 10171031.
  • Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, W. (1999). Communication and information: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 287303.
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 4974.
  • Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Retrieved April 26, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 931.
  • Neustadtl, A., & Robinson, J. P. (2002). Social contact differences between Internet users and nonusers in the general social survey. IT & Society, 1(1), 73102.
  • Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S, & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: A time diary study. In B.Wellman & C.Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 216243). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 8097.
  • Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). “Making MOOsic”: The development of personal relationships online and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(4), 517537.
  • Pool, I.De S. (Ed.). (1977). The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Robinson, J. P., Kestnbaum, M., Neustadtl, A., & Alvarez, A. S. (2002). Information technology and social time displacement. IT & Society, 1(1), 2137.
  • Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The Internet and social participation: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1). Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/shklovski_kraut.html
  • Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • UCLA Center for Communication Policy. (2000). The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future. Retrieved April 26, 2006, from http://digitalcenter.org/pdf/InternetReportYearOne.pdf
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2000). Social capital and the Net. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 6065.
  • Weiser, E. B. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(6), 723743.
  • Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436455.
  • Wellman, B., & Potter, S. (1998). The elements of personal communities. In B.Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. 4979). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.