• Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 3135.
  • Brunner, G. A., & Carroll, S. J. (1969). The effect of prior notification on the refusal rate in fixed address surveys. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(1), 4244.
  • Chaikin, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752766.
  • DeBono, K. G., & Harnish, R. J. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: a functional approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 55(4), 541546.
  • Dillman, D. A., Sinclair, M. D., & Clark, J. R. (1993). Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(3), 289304.
  • Frey, K. P., & Eagly, A. H. (1993). Vividness can undermine the persuasiveness of messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 3244.
  • Frick, A., Bächtinger, M. T., & Reips, U. D. (1999). Financial incentives, personal information and drop-out rate in online studies. In U. D.Reips, B.Batinic, W.Bandilla, M.Bosnjak, L.Gräf, K.Moser, & A.Werner, (Eds.), Current Internet science—Trends, techniques, results. [Aktuelle online-forschung—Trends, techniken, ergebnisse.] Zürich: Online Press. Retrieved April 10, 2006, from
  • Groves, R. M., Singer, E., & Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-Saliency theory of survey participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 299308.
  • Lana, R. E. (1963). Interest, media, and order effects in persuasive communications. Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 913.
  • Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343356.
  • McGinnies, A. (1965). A cross-cultural comparison of printed communication versus spoken communication is persuasion. Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 18.
  • Moon, Y. (1999). The effects of physical distance and response latency on persuasion in computer-mediated communication and human-computer communication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(4), 379392.
  • Pallak, S. R. (1983). Salience of a communicator’s physical attractiveness and persuasion: A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation. Social Cognition, 2(2), 158170.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
  • Raghunathan, R., & Trope, Y. (2002). Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: Mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83(3), 510525.
  • Roscoe, A. M., Lang, D., & Sheth, J. N. (1975). Follow-up methods, questionnaire length, and market differences in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing, 39(2), 2027.
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Robinson, E. J. (Eds.). (1967). Experiments in persuasion. New York: Academic Press.
  • Singer, E., Van Hoewyk, J., Gebler, N., Raghunathan, T., & McGonagle, K. (1999). The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 15(2), 217230.
  • Tuten, T. L., Bosnjak, M., & Bandilla, W. (2000). Banner-advertised web-surveys. Marketing Research, 11(4), 1721.
  • Yammarino, F. J., Skinner, S. J., & Childers, T. L. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behaviour: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(4), 613639.