SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 1740.
  • Argote, L. (1999). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
  • Argote, L., & Ophir, R. (2002). Intraorganizational learning. In J. A. C.Baum, (Ed.), Companion to Organizations (pp. 181207). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In P. J.Hinds & S.Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 167186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (2004a). Introduction: Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. In S. A.Barab, R.Kling, & J. H.Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (Eds.). (2004b). Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community. In S. A.Barab, R.Kling, & J. H.Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 5390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baum, J. A. C. (1999). Whole-part coevolutionary competition in organization. In J. A. C.Baum, B.McKelvey (Ed.), Variations in Organization Science (pp. 113136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6.0. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
  • Bradner, E., & Mark, G. (2002, November). Why Distance Matters: Effects on Cooperation, Persuasion and Deception. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’02), New Orleans, LA.
  • Burt, R. S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks, 19(4), 355373.
  • Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N.Lin, K.Cook, & R.Burt (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research (pp. 3156). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Byrne, D. E. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
  • Connaughton, S. L., & Daly, J. A. (2004). Long distance leadership: Communicative strategies for leading virtual teams. In D. J.Pauleen (Ed.), Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols, and Processes (pp. 116144). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. K. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural determinants. Management Science, 32(5), 554571.
  • Feld, S. (1981). The focused organization of organizational ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 10151035.
  • Feld, S. (1982). Structural determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 797801.
  • Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921950.
  • Geletkanycz, M., & Hambrick, D. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654681.
  • Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82111.
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2001). Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17(3), 211226.
  • Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 46(12), 11011104.
  • Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615632.
  • Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422447.
  • Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673703.
  • Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277303.
  • Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kavanaugh, A. L., Reese, D. D., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. The Information Society, 21(2), 119131.
  • Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N.Nohria & R.Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (pp. 216239). Boston: Harvard Business School Express.
  • Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D.Kirshner & J. A.Whitson (Eds.), Situated Cognition (pp. 1735). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leenders, R. T. A. J. (1996). Evolution of friendship and best friendship choices. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1–2), 133148.
  • Leonard, M. (2004). Bonding and bridging social capital: Reflections from Belfast. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 38(5), 927944.
  • Lewis, K. (2000, August). Is performance all in their mind(s)? The impact of transactive memory on knowledge worker team performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
  • Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks in America. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122113.
  • Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network diversity, substructure and opportunity for contact. In C.Calhoun, M. W.Meyer, & W. R.Scott (Eds.), Structures of Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor of Peter Blau (pp. 397410). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McKelvey, B. (1999). Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organization Science, 10(3), 294321.
  • McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52(3), 370.
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415444.
  • Mollica, K. A., Gray, B., & Trevino, L. K. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organization Science, 14(2), 123136.
  • Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Monge, P. R., Rothman, L. W., Eisenberg, E. M., Miller, K. I., & Kirste, K. K. (1985). The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science, 31(9), 11391141.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673693.
  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon Schuster.
  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 21(10), 343.
  • Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B.Wellman & S. D.Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach (pp. 1961). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yuan, Y. C., Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2006). Focused activities and the development of social capital in a distributed learning “community.” The Information Society, 22(1), 2529.
  • Yuan, Y. C., & McKelvey, B. (2004). Situated learning theory: Adding rate and complexity effects via Kauffman’s NK model. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8(1), 65101.