SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C.Emerson & M.Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (pp. 60102). Austin: University of Texas.
  • Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (Eds.) (2004). Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bargiela-Chiappini, & Nickerson, C. (1999). Business writing as social action. In F.Bargiela-Chiappini & C.Nickerson (Eds.), Writing Business: Genres, Media, and Discourses (pp. 132). New York: Longman.
  • Bargiela-Chiappini, F. & Nickerson, C. (Eds.) (1999). Writing Business: Genres, Media, and Discourses. New York: Longman.
  • Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication 18(2), 133170.
  • Barton, D. (1994). Literacy. An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  • Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brigham, M., & Corbett, J. M. (1997). Email, power and the constitution of organizational reality. New Technology, Work and Employment 12(1), 2535.
  • Brown, P., & S. C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, S., Middleton, D., & Lightfoot, G. (2001). Performing the past in electronic archives: Interdependencies in the discursive and non-discursive ordering of institutional rememberings. Culture and Psychology, 7(2), 123143.
  • Clark, H. (1992). Arenas of Language Use. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
  • Collot, M., & Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. C.Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 1328). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
  • Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. Communication Yearbook, 18, 434453.
  • Gimenez, J. (2000). Business email communication: some emerging tendencies in register. English for Special Purposes, 19, 237251.
  • Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. Forms of Talk (pp. 124157). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Gunnarsson, B.-L. (Ed.) (2005). Communication in the Workplace. Uppsala: Universitetstryckeriet.
  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge; New York: Polity Press.
  • Herring, S. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. C.Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 81106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Herring, S. C. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D.Schiffrin, D.Tannen, & H.Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612634). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behaviour. In S. A.Barab, R.Kling, & J. H.Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communitites in the Service of Learning (pp. 338376). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Malden: Blackwell.
  • Kankaanranta, A. (2005). English as a corporate language: Company-internal email messages written by Finns and Swedes. In B. L.Gunnarsson (Ed.), Communication in the Workplace (pp. 4259). Uppsala: Universitetstryckeriet.
  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogu: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Markus, L. M. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502527.
  • Mulholland, J. (1999). Email: Uses, issues and problems in an institutional setting. In F.Bargiela-Chiappini & C.Nickerson (Eds.), Writing Business: Genres, Media and Discourses (pp. 5084). London: Longman.
  • Murray, D. E. (1991). Conversation for Action: The Computer Terminal as Medium of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
  • Nickerson, C. (1999). Corporate culture and the use of English in electronic mail in a multinational corporation. In F.Bargiela-Chiappini & C.Nickerson (Eds.), Writing Business: Genres, Media and Discourses (pp. 3555). London: Longman.
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 39(4), 541574.
  • Romm, C. T., & Pliskin, N. (1998). Electronic mail as a coalition-building information technology. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(1), 82100.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), 695737.
  • Sims, B. R. (1996). Electronic mail in two corporate workplaces. In P.Sullivan &. J.Dautermann (Eds.), Electronic Literacies in the Workplace (pp. 4164). Urbana, Illinois: The National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 14921512.
  • Sullivan, P., & DautermannJ. (Eds.) (1996). Electronic Literacies in the Workplace (pp. 4164). Urbana, Illinois: The National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Yates, S. J. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In S. C.Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspective (pp. 2946). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299326.
  • Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. The Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 1335.