SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organisation of accounts. London: Sage.
  • Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, W. (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.
  • Baym, N. (1999). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Baym, N., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M. (2004). Social interactions across media. New Media and Society, 6(3), 4160.
  • Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 543558.
  • Drew, P. (1989). Recalling someone from the past. In D.Roger & P.Bull (Eds), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (96115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27(4), 495523.
  • Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking—On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology, 1(4), 515542.
  • Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(3), 211247.
  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
  • Frohlich, D. M., Drew, P., & Monk, A. (1994). The management of repair in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 9(3–4), 385426.
  • Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337367.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C.McKinney & E. A.Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 337366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved March 1, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html
  • Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D.Tannen, D.Schiffin, & H.Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612634). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A.Barab, R.Kling, & J. H.Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holt, E., & Clift, R. (Eds.). (Forthcoming). Voicing: Reported speech and footing in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holt, L. (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 21945.
  • Holt, L., & Drew, P. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35(4), 398417.
  • Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Lamerichs, J., & Te Molder, H. (2003). Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society, 5(4), 451473.
  • Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
  • Nevile, M. (2004). Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Núñez, F., Gálvez, A., & Vayreda, A. (2002). La participación en un foro electrónico: Motivos, auditorios y posicionamientos. Redcientífica. Retreived January 20, 2004, from http://www.redcientifica.com/cgi-bin/index/index.pl
  • Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved March 30, 2004, http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html
  • Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14(6), 783794.
  • Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2003). Rethinking cognition: On Coulter, discourse and mind. Human Studies, 26(2), 165181.
  • Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. London: Sage
  • Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing, usability and supporting sociability. London: Wiley.
  • Reed, D. (2001). “Making Conversation:” Sequential integrity and the local management of interaction on Internet newsgroups. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences—2001. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2001/0981/04/09814035abs.htm
  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 & 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696735.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of conversation: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101114.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P.Drew & A.Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89135). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165187.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Schegloff’s texts as ‘Billig’s data: A critical reply. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 558572.
  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1967). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289327. Reprinted in R.Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 233–264). Harmondsworth, London: Penguin.
  • Ten Have, P. (1999) Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
  • Ten Have, P. (2004) Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London: Sage Publications.
  • Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387412.
  • Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. London and New York: Sage.