SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerman, S. K. (2002). Mapping user interface design to culture dimensions. Paper presented at International Workshop on Internationalization of Products and Systems, Austin TX, USA. Retrieved May 20, 2002, from http://www.iwips2002.org/downloads/AMA_XCult_13Jul02.ppt
  • Albers-Miller, N. D., & Gelb, B. D. (1996). Business advertising appeals as a mirror of cultural dimensions: A study of eleven countries. Journal of Advertising, 25, 5770.
  • Al-Olayan, F. S., & Karande, K. (2000). A content analysis of magazine advertisements from the United States and the Arab world. Journal of Advertising, 29, 6983.
  • Barber, W., & Badre, A. (1998). Culturability: The merging of culture and usability. Paper presented at 4th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, Baskin Ridge NJ, USA. Retrieved April 30, 2000, from http://www.research.att.com/conf/hfweb/proceedings/barber/
  • Baskerville, R. F. (2003). Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 114.
  • Bell, P. (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In T.Van Leeuwen & C.Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 92118). London: Sage.
  • Burton, J. [1989] 1991). Europe’s blond, blue-eyed JAPANESE. International Management (May). Reprinted in B.Arildsen, O.Faaborg & R.Flensted (Eds.), Across cultures: Cultural management (pp. 7780). Herning, Denmark: systime.
  • Bucher, H.-J. (2002). The power of the audience: Interculturality, interactivity and trust in Internet communication. In F.Sudweeks & C.Ess (Eds.), Proceedings cultural attitudes towards communication and technology 2002 (pp. 314). Murdoch, Western Australia: School of Information Technology, Murdoch University.
  • Callahan, E. (2004). Interface design and culture. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 257310.
  • Choong, Y. Y., & Salvendy, G. (1999). Implications for design of computer interfaces for Chinese users in mainland China. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 2946.
  • Cutler, B. D., & Javalgi, R. (1992). A cross-cultural analysis of the visual components of print advertising: The United States and the European Community. Journal of Advertising Research, 32, 7180.
  • Del Galdo, E. (1990). Internationalization and translation. Some guidelines for the design of human-computer interfaces. In J.Nielsen (Ed.), Designing User Interfaces for International Use (pp. 110). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Dormann, C., & Chisalita, C. (2002). Cultural values in web site design. Paper presented at ECCE-11: Eleventh European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, September 8-11, 2002, Catania, Italy. Retrieved Feb.10, 2003, from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~claire/Hofstede-dormann.pdf
  • Duncker, E., Theng, Y-L., & Mohd-Nasir, N. (2000). Cultural usability in digital libraries. ASIS Bulletin 26 (4). Retrieved April 14, 2003, from http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/May-00/duncker__et_al.html
  • Evans, M., McBride, A., Queen, M., Thayer, A., & Spyridakis, J. (2004). Has the tone of online English become globalized? An empirical research study investigating the written tone of university web sites around the world. In F.Sudweeks and C.Ess (Eds.), Fourth International Conference on Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication 2004 (pp. 135139). Murdoch, Western Australia: School of Information Technology, Murdoch University.
  • Fang, T. (2003). Critique of Hofstede’s fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 3, 347368.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (2002). Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney, Human Relations, 55, 13551361.
  • Leonardi, P. (2002). Cultural variability in web interface design: Communicating US Hispanic cultural values on the Internet. In F.Sudweeks & C.Ess (Eds.), Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology 2002 (pp. 297315). Murdoch, Western Australia: School of Information Technology, Murdoch University.
  • Lin, S.-L. (2003). Websites design of Internet banks in U.S., U.K. and Japan. Unpublished manuscript, School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University Bloomington.
  • Marcus, A. & Gould, E. W. (2000, June 19). Cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design: What? So what? Now what? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, June 19, 2000. Retrieved Jun. 15, 2001, from http://www.amanda.com/resources/hfweb2000/hfweb00.marcus.html
  • McSweeney, B. (2002a). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89118.
  • McSweeney, B. (2002b). The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. Human Relations, 55, 13631372.
  • Rajkumar, S. (2003). University Web sites: Design differences and reflections of culture. Unpublished manuscript, School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University Bloomington.
  • Rasmussen, A. S., & Bank-Middelsen, G. (2000). Focus on culture. Århus, Denmark: systime.
  • Reader’s Digest. (1970). A Survey of Europe Today. London: Author.
  • Robbins, S. S., & Stylianou, A. C. (2002). A study of cultural differences in global corporate web sites. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 39.
  • Roberts, K. H., & Boyacigiller, N. (1984). Cross national organizational research: The grasp of the blind men. In L. L.Cummings & B. M.Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 6 (pp. 455488). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Russo, P., & Boor, S. (1993). How fluent is your interface? Designing for international users. Proceedings INTERCHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93. Amsterdam, 24–29 April (pp. 342347). ACM Press.
  • Schmid-Isler, S. (2000). The language of digital genres—a semiotic investigation of style and iconology on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2000) . Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2000/0493/03/04933012.pdf
  • Sheppard, C., & Scholtz, J. (1999). The effects of cultural markers on Web site use. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, Gaithesburg, Maryland, USA. Retrieved September 15, 2001, from http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/proceedings/sheppard/
  • Smith, P. B. (2002). Culture’s consequences: Something old and something new. Human Relations, 55, 119135.
  • Søndergaard, M. (1994). Hofstede’s Consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications. Organisation Studies, 15, 447456.
  • Tansey, R., & Hyman, M. R. (1990). Cultural themes in Brazilian and U.S. auto ads: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Advertising, 19, 3040.
  • Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. In Conference proceedings on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 115122). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Wernick, A. (1991). Promotional culture: Advertising, ideology and symbolic expression. London: Sage.
  • Williamson, D. (2002). Forward from a critique of Hofstede’s model of national culture. Human Relations, 55, 13731395.