SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., & Messina, P. (2003). Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved November 13, 2006 from www.nsf.gov/cise/sci/reports/atkins.pdf
  • Buyya, R., & Venugopal, S. (2005). A gentle introduction to Grid computing and technologies. CSI Communications, 29(1), 919.
  • Clarke, D. (2000). The active pursuit of active viewers: Directions in audience research. Canadian Journal of Communication, 25 (1). Retrieved December 19, 2006 from http://cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=561&layout=html
  • Hine, C. (2003, September). Systematics as cyberscience: The role of ICTs in the working practices of taxonomy. Paper presented at Oxford Internet Institute Information, Communication & Society symposium, University of Oxford. Retrieved November 13, 2006 from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/pdfs/hine_oii.pdf
  • Hine, C. (Ed.) (2006). New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  • Jankowski, N., & Caldas, A. (2004, November). e-Science: Principles, projects and possibilities for communication and Internet studies. Paper presented at Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap [Day of Communication Science], University of Twente, the Netherlands.
  • Jankowski, N., Jones, S., Howard, P., Foot, K., Mansell, R., Schneider, S., & Silverstone, R. (2003). The Internet and communication studies. In M. Price & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.) The Internet and the Academy (pp. 168195). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Kluver, R., Jankowski, N., Foot, K., & Schneider, S. (forthcoming 2007). The Internet and National Elections: A Comparative Study of Web Campaigning. London: Routledge.
  • Merton, R. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
  • Olson, G. M., Zimmerman, A., & Bos, N. D. (forthcoming 2007). Science on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Price. M., & Nissenbaum, H.. (Eds.). (2003). The Internet and the Academy. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (Eds.). (2001). Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25(6), 865899.
  • Wilson, T. D. (2004). Review of: Nentwich, M. Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Information Research, 9 (3). Retrieved November 13, 2006 from http://informationr.net/ir/reviews/revs130.html
  • Woolgar, S. (n.d.). Social shaping perspectives on e-science and e-social science: The case for research support. Unpublished paper, National Center for e-Social Science. Retrieved November 13, 2006 from http://www.ncess.ac.uk/docs/social_shaping_perspectives.pdf
  • Woolgar, S. (2002). Five rules of virtuality. In S.Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cybole Reality (pp. 122). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Woolgar, S., & Coopmans, C. (2006). Virtual witnessing in a virtual age: A prospectus for social studies of e-science. In C.Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 125). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  • Wouters, P. (1996). Cyberscience. Kennis en Methode, 20(2), 155186.