SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Armbruster, C. (2005). Open access in social and cultural science: Innovative moves to enhance access, inclusion and impact in scholarly communication. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved September 28, 2006 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=434782
  • Atkins, D. E, et al. (2003). Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation.
  • Barjak, F. (2006). Personal communication, December 18, 2006.
  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquiry and the Culture of Disciplines (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Berman, F., & Brady, H. (2005). Final Report: NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences. Retrieved December 7, 2006 from http://vis.sdsc.edu/sbe/reports/SBE-CISE-FINAL.pdf
  • Collins, R. (1994). Why the social sciences won’t become high-consensus, rapid-discovery science. Sociological Forum, 9(2), 15577.
  • Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and institutional boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 70322.
  • David, P. A. (2004). Towards a cyberinfrastructure for enhanced scientific collaboration. OII Research Report No. 4. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. Retrieved September 28, 2006 from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/resources/publications/RR4.pdf
  • David, P. A., & Spence, M. (2003). Towards institutional infrastructures for e-science: The scope of the challenge. OII Research Report No. 2. Retrieved December 5, 2006 from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/resources/publications/RR2.pdfm
  • Drori, G., Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Finholt, T. A. (2002). Collaboratories: Science over the Internet. In S. J.Lita, S. D.Nelson, & A. H.Teich (Eds.), AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook (pp. 339344). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Fry, J. (2006). Coordination and control of research practice across scientific fields: Implications for a differentiated e-science. In C.Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 167187). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Fuchs, S. (1992). The Professional Quest for Truth. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Galison, P., & Hevly, B. (Eds.) (1992). Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Hey, A., & Trefethen, A. (2003). The data deluge: An e-science perspective. In F.Berman, G. C.Fox, & AnthonyHey (Eds.), Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality (pp. 809824). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Hine, C. (2005, November). The politics and practice of accessibility in systematics. Past, Present and Future of Research in the Information Society. An official side event preceding Phase II of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), Tunis.
  • Hine, C. (2006). Computerization movements and scientific disciplines: The reflexive potential of new technologies. In C.Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 2647). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Hughes, T. (1998). Rescuing Prometheus. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Jeffreys, P. (2005). Presentation at Oxford Internet Institute workshop. December 2, 2005.
  • Jirotka, M., Procter, R., Rodden, T., & Bowker, G. C. (2005). Collaboration and trust in healthcare innovation: The eDiaMoND case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14(4), 369398.
  • Iacono, S., & Kling, R. (2001). Computerization movements: The rise of the Internet and distant forms of work. In J.Yates, & J.Van Maanen (Eds.), Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric and Practice (pp. 93135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
  • Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Association for Information Science, 51(14), 13061320.
  • Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2000). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(10), 17521774.
  • Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
  • Nentwich, M. (2006). Cyberinfrastructure for next generation scholarly publishing. In C.Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 189205). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Rule, J. (1997). Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schroeder, R. (2006, June). e-Sciences: Infrastructures that reshape the global contours of knowledge. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester. Retrieved September 28, 2006 from http://www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference/2006/papers/
  • Select Committee on Science and Technology. (2002). What on Earth? The Threat to the Science Underpinning Conservation. London: House of Lords.
  • Sonnenwald, D. (2006). Collaborative virtual environments for scientific collaboration: Technical and organizational design frameworks. In R.Schroeder R. & A.-S.Axelsson (Eds.), Avatars at Work and Play: Collaboration and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments (pp. 6396). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Taylor, J. (2001). Presentation given at U.K. e-science meeting, July, London. Retrieved September 28, 2006 from http://www.ncess.ac.uk/insight/tutorials/e-social_science/vision/
  • Vann, K., & Bowker, G. (2006). Interest in production: On the configuration of technology-bearing labours for epistemic IT. In C.Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 7197). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Weber, M. (1949). “Objectivity” in social science and social policy. In M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (pp. 49112). New York: The Free Press.
  • Westwick, P. (2003). The National Labs: Science in an American System, 1947-1974. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Whitley, R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Woolgar, S., & Coopmans, C. (2006). Virtual witnessing in a virtual age: A prospectus for social studies of e-science. In C.Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 125). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Wouters, P., & Beaulieu, A. (2006). Imagining e-science beyond computation. In C.Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 4870). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.