SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerman, M. (2002, June 14). Personal communication.
  • AIP Study of Multi-Institutional Collaborations. (1992). Phase I: High-Energy Physics. New York: American Institute of Physics. Retrieved August 4, 2006 from http://www.aip.org/history/pubslst.htm#collabs
  • AIP Study of Multi-Institutional Collaborations. (1995). Phase II: Space Science and Geophysics. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. Retrieved August 4, 2006 from http://www.aip.org/history/pubslst.htm#collabs
  • AIP Study of Multi-Institutional Collaborations. (1999). Phase III: Ground-Based Astronomy, Materials Science, Heavy-Ion and Nuclear Physics, Medical Physics, and Computer-Mediated Collaborations. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. Retrieved August 4, 2006 from http://www.aip.org/history/pubslst.htm#collabs
  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bafoutsou, G., & Mentzas, G. (2002). Review and functional classification of collaborative systems. International Journal of Information Management, 22, 281305.
  • Baxevanis, A. D. (2002). The molecular biology database collection: 2002 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(1), 112.
  • Brophy, S. P. (2003). Constructing shareable learning materials in bioengineering education. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 22(4), 3946.
  • Berman, H. M., Bourne, P. E., & Westbrook, J. (2004). The Protein Data Bank: A case study in management of community data. Current Proteomics, 1, 4957.
  • Chompalov, I., & Shrum, W. (1999). Institutional collaboration in science: A typology of technological practice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24(3), 338372.
  • Collins, H. M. (1998). The meaning of data: Open and closed evidential cultures in the search for gravitational waves. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 293338.
  • Cramton, C. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346371.
  • Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Connolly, T., Thorn, B. K., & Heminger, A. (1992). Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
  • Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703722.
  • DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 23(5), 589609.
  • Grudin, J. (1994). Computer-supported cooperative work: History and focus. IEEE Computer, 27(5), 1926.
  • Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E.Salas & S. M.Fiore (Eds.), Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance. (pp. 177201). Washington: APA Press. Retrieved May 4, 2005 from http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/papers/
  • Hesse, B. W., Sproull, L. S., Kiesler, S. B., & Walsh, J. P. (1993). Returns to science: Computer networks in oceanography. Communications of the ACM, 36(8), 90101.
  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 659671.
  • Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791815.
  • Kibrick, R., Conrad A., & Perala, A. (1998). Through the far looking glass: Collaborative remote observing with the W.M. Keck Observatory. Interactions, 5(3), 3239.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1963). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge, and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4), 305317.
  • Myers, J. D., Chappell, A. R., & Elder, M. (2003). Re-integrating the research record. Computing in Science & Engineering, May/June, 4450.
  • National Research Council (U.S.). (1993). National Collaboratories: Applying Information Technology for Scientific Research. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
  • National Science Foundation. (2004). Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966-2001. Division of Science Resources Statistics, NSF 04-311, Project Officers, Susan T. Hill and Jean M. Johnson. Arlington, VA. Retrieved June 12, 2005 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf04311/htmstart.htm
  • Newman, M. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, 98(2), 404409.
  • Olson, G. M., Zimmerman, A., & Bos, N. D. (forthcoming 2007). Science on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 139179.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Science of Collaboratories (SOC) research group. (2001). Social underpinnings workshop report. Retrieved January 26, 2006 from http://www.scienceofcollaboratories.org/Workshops/WorkshopJune42001/index.php
  • Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., Harvey, R., Phillips, K., Baezconde-Garbanati, L, et al. (2003). Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5(Suppl. 1), S2139.
  • Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., & Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(Suppl. 2), 202213.
  • Stork, D. G. (1999). Character and document research in the Open Mind Initiative. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Press, 112.
  • Szulanski, G. (1992). Sticky Knowledge: Barriers to Knowing in the Firm. London: Sage Publications.
  • Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 575582). New York: ACM Press.
  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small world” networks. Nature, 393, 440442.
  • Weedman, J. (1998). The structure of incentive: Design and client roles in application-oriented research. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(3), 315345.
  • Wegner, E., & Lave, J. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wulf, W. A. (1989). The national collaboratory—A white paper. In J.Lederberg & K.Uncaphar (Eds.), Towards a National Collaboratory: Report of an Invitational Workshop at the Rockefeller University, March 17-18, 1989 (Appendix A). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Computer and Information Science Engineering.
  • Wulf, W. A. (1993). The collaboratory opportunity. Science, 261 (5123), 854855.