SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Applied Science Laboratories. (2001). Eye Tracking System Instruction Manual: Model 504 Pan/Tilt Optics. Bedford, MA: Applied Science Group, Inc. Retrieved February 25, 2007 from http://www.cis.rit.edu/people/faculty/pelz/research/manuals/asl_504_manual.pdf
  • Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276292.
  • Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2002). Differences and similarities in information seeking: Children and adults as Web users. Information Processing & Management, 38(5), 649670.
  • Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30 (1-7), 107117.
  • Broder, A. (2002). A taxonomy of Web search. SIGIR Forum, 36(2), 310.
  • Brooks, T. A. (2004). The nature of meaning in the age of Google. Information Research, 9(3). Retrieved April 12, 2005 from http://informationr.net/ir/9-3/paper180.html
  • Cho, J., & Roy, S. (2004). Impact of search engines on page popularity. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 2029). New York: ACM Press.
  • DeGraef, P., De Troy, A., & D’Ydewalle, G. (1992). Local and global contextual constraints on the identification of objects in scenes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 489508.
  • Duchowski, A. (2003). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. London: Springer.
  • Epstein, J., Klinkenberg, W. D., Wiley, D., & McKinley, L. (2001). Insuring sample equivalence across Internet and paper-and-pencil assessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(3), 339346.
  • Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 316255.
  • Gerhart, S. (2004). Do Web search engines suppress controversy? First Monday, 9(1). Retrieved April 12, 2005 from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_1/gerhart/index.html
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2002). Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Goldberg, J. H., Stimson, M. J., Lewenstein, M., Scott, N., & Wichansky, A. M. (2002). Eye tracking in Web search tasks: Design implications. In Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 5158). New York: ACM Press.
  • Google Inc. (2005a). Google corporate information: Google milestones. Retrieved February 25, 2007 from http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html
  • Google Inc. (2005b). Google press center: Zeitgeist. Retrieved February 25, 2007 from http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html
  • Gordon, M., & Pathak, P. (1999). Finding information on the World Wide Web: The retrieval effectiveness of search engines. Information Processing and Management, 35(2), 141180.
  • Granka, L., Joachims, T., & Gay, G. (2004). Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 478479). New York: ACM Press.
  • Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). Effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210228.
  • Hess, E. H. (1965). Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 212(4), 4654.
  • Hindman M., Tsioutsiouliklis K., & Johnson, J. A. (2003). “Googlearchy:” How a few heavily-linked sites dominate the Web. Retrieved February 25, 2007 from http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~kt/mpsa03.pdf
  • Hsieh-Yee, I. (2001). Research on Web search behavior. Library and Information Science Research, 23(2), 167185.
  • Huey, E. B. (1908). The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. New York: MacMillan.
  • Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169185.
  • Jansen, B. J., & Spink, A. (2004). An analysis of Web searching by European AlltheWeb.com users. Information Processing and Management, 41(2), 361381.
  • Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., Bateman, J., & Saracevic. T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the Web. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 207227.
  • Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Pedersen, J. (2005). A temporal comparison of Alta Vista Web searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(6), 559570.
  • Joachims, T. (2002). Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 132142). New York: ACM Press.
  • Josephson, S., & Holmes, M. E. (2002). Visual attention to repeated Internet images: Testing the scanpath theory on the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 4351). New York: ACM Press.
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 224244.
  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Lankford, C. (2000). Gazetracker: Software designed to facilitate eye movement analysis. Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 5155). New York: ACM Press.
  • Lorigo, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Granka, L., & Gay, G. (2005). The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Information Processing and Management, 42(4), 11231131.
  • Luhmann, N. (1989). Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismsum der Reduktion Sozialer Komplexitat. Stuttgart: Enke.
  • Nguyen, K., Wagner, C., Koons, D., & Flickner, M. (2002). Differences in the infrared bright pupil response of human eyes. Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 133138). New York: ACM.
  • Ozmutlu, S., Spink, A., & Ozmutlu, H. C. (2004). A day in the life of Web searching: An exploratory study. Information Processing and Management, 40(2), 319345.
  • Pan, B., Hembrooke, H. Gay, G., Granka, L., Feusner, M., & Newman, J. (2004). The determinants of Web page viewing behavior: An eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye tracking Research & Applications (pp. 147154). New York: ACM Press.
  • Pandey, S., Roy, S., Olston, C., Cho, J., & Chakrabarti, S. (2005). Shuffling a stacked deck: The case for partially randomized ranking of search engine results. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (pp. 781792). New York: ACM Press.
  • Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643675.
  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements and information processing: 20 years of research Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372.
  • Rayner, K., Rottello, C. M., Stewart, A. J., Keir, J., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Integrating text and pictorial information: Eye movements when looking at print advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 219226.
  • Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. & Huber, O. (2003). Information search in the laboratory and on the Web: With or without an experimenter. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35(2), 227235.
  • Search Engine Watch. (2007). U.S. search engine rankings and top 50 web rankings, January 2007. Retrieved March 25, 2007 from http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3625081
  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129138.
  • Spink, A., & Ozmultu, H. C. (2002). Characteristics of question format Web queries: An exploratory study. Information Processing and Management 38, (4), 453471.
  • Stanford-Poynter Project. (2000). Front Page Entry Points. Retrieved February 25, 2007 from http://www.poynterextra.org/et/i.htm
  • Tatum, C. (2005). Deconstructing Google bombs: A breach of symbolic power of just a goofy prank? First Monday, 10 (10). Retrieved February 25, 2007 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/tatum/