SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Berger, M., Wagner, T., & Baker, L. C. (2005). Internet use and stigmatized illness. Social Science and Medicine, 61(8), 18211827.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
  • Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 3754.
  • Carrasco, J., Hogan, B., Wellman, B., & Miller, E. (2006, January). Collecting social network data to study social activity–travel behavior: An egocentric approach. Paper presented at the 85th Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C. Retrieved March 3, 2007 from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
  • Charney, T., & Greenberg, B. (2001). Uses and gratifications of the Internet. In C.Lin & D.Atkin (Eds.), Communication, Technology and Society: New Media Adoption and Uses (pp. 379 407). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Cunningham, S. J., Reeves, N., & Britland, M. (2003). An ethnographic study of music information seeking: Implications for the design of a music digital library. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 516). Houston, TX: IEEE Press.
  • December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for Internet communication. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 1438.
  • DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 4(2), 189201.
  • DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263287.
  • DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2002, August). The new digital inequality: Social stratification among Internet users. Paper presented at the 97th Anuual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Ebersole, S. (2000). Uses and gratifications of the Web among students. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 6 (1). Retrieved March 3, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/ebersole.html
  • Erickson, B. H. (1991). What is good taste good for? Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 28(2), 255279.
  • Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 217251.
  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 153181.
  • Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (pp. 115). New York: ACM Press.
  • Gans, H. (1974). Popular Culture and High Culture. New York: Basic Books.
  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201233.
  • Gray, N. J., Klein, J. D., Noyce, P. R., Sesselberg, T. S., & Cantrill, J. A. (2005). Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the Internet. Social Science and Medicine, 60(7), 14671478.
  • Hargittai, E. (2003a). How Wide a Web? Inequalities in Accessing Information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
  • Hargittai, E. (2003b). Serving citizens’ needs: Minimizing online hurdles to accessing government information. IT & Society, 1(3), 2741.
  • Hargittai, E. (2007). Content diversity online: Myth or reality? In P.Napoli (Ed.), Media Diversity and Localism: Meanings and Metrics (pp. 349362). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hogan, B., Carrasco, J. A., & Wellman, B. (2007). Visualizing personal networks: Working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods, 19(2), 116144.
  • Howard, P. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 383404.
  • Hunter, A. (1988). Formal education and initial employment: Unravelling the relationships between schooling and skills over time. American Sociological Review, 53(5), 753765.
  • Kalichman, S. C., Cherry, C., Cain, D., Weinhardt, L. S., Benotsch, E., Pope, H. et al. (2006).Health information on the Internet and people living with HIV/AIDS: Information evaluation and coping styles. Health Psychology, 25(2), 205210.
  • Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 6178.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarerly, 37(4), 509524.
  • Kayahara, J., & Wellman, B. (2005, July). Canadians, Computers and Culture. Report to Heritage Canada. Retrieved March 3, 2007 from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html
  • Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the Web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 5478.
  • Kindred, R., & Mohammed, S. (2005). “He will crush you like an academic ninja!”: Exploring teacher ratings on ratemyprofessors.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (3), article 9. Retrieved March 3, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/kindred.html
  • LaRose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet use and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358377.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People’s Choice; How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Leiber, J., & Stoller, M. (1957). Searchin’. [Recorded by The Coasters.] On Searchin’ [45rpm]. New York: Atco Records.
  • Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 3950.
  • Nettleton, S., Burrows, R., & O’Malley, L. (2005). The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the Internet for health, and their consequence for media convergence. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(7), 972992.
  • Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175196.
  • Ruggerio, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 337.
  • Savolainen, R. (1999). The role of the Internet in information seeking. Putting the networked services in context. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 765782.
  • Schutz, W. C. (1966). The Interpersonal Underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
  • Song, I., LaRose, R., Eastin, M. S., & Lin, C. (2004). Internet gratification and Internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(4), 385395.
  • Stafford, T. F., & Stafford, M. R. (1998). Uses and gratifications of the World Wide Web: A preliminary study. In D.Muehling (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Advertising Conference (pp. 174182). Pullman: Washington State University.
  • Stafford, T. F., & Stafford, M. R. (2001). Identifying motivations for the use of commercial Web sites. Information Resources Management Journal, 14(1), 2230.
  • Statistics Canada. (2002, June 27). Population and Dwelling Counts, for Canada, Provinces, Territories and Census Subdivisions (Municipalities), 2001 and 1996 Censuses, 100% Data (table). Population and Dwelling Counts. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 93F0051XIE. Ottawa. Retrieved April 4, 2007 from http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/popdwell/tables.cfm
  • Sullivan, D. (2003). Nielsen NetRatings search engine ratings. Retrieved March 3, 2007 from http://www.searchenginewatch.com [requires subscription].
  • Troldahl, V. C. (1966). A field test of a modified “two-step flow of communication” model. Public Opinion Quarterly, 30(4), 609623.
  • Weimann, G. (1982). On the importance of marginality: One more step into the two-step flow of communication. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 764773.
  • Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B.Wellman & S. D.Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach (pp. 1961). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2002). The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wellman, B., & Hogan, B. (2006). Connected lives: The project. In P.Purcell (Ed.), Networked Neighbourhoods: The Online Community in Context (pp. 157211). Guildford, UK: Springer.