SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Armitt, G., Slack, F., Green, S., & Beer, M. (2002, January). The development of deep learning during a synchronous collaborative on-line course. Paper presented at CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO.
  • Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P.Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 3163). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(1), 156179.
  • Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J.Bonk & K. S.King (Eds.), Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse (pp. 2550). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bonk, C. J., & Kim, K. A. (1998). Extending sociocultural theory to adult learning. In C. M.Smith & T.Pourchot (Eds.), Adult Learning and Development: Perspectives from Educational Psychology (pp. 6788). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Chou, C. (2001). Model of learner-centered computer-mediated interaction for collaborative distance learning. In Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved June 25, 2007 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1a/85/7d.pdf
  • Cox, G., Carr, T., & Hall, M. (2004). Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 183193.
  • Curtis, D., & Lawson, M. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1). Retrieved June 25, 2007 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n1/pdf/v5n1_curtis.pdf
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Organizational Behavior, 6, 191233.
  • Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Tanner, E. J. (2001). How do students participate in synchronous and asynchronous online discussions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 341366.
  • Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256274.
  • DeWert, M. H., Babinski, L. M., & Jones, B. D. (2003). Safe passages: Providing online support to beginning teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 311320.
  • Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 4054.
  • Fisher, M., & Coleman, B. (2001–2002). Collaborative online learning in virtual discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 317.
  • Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921950.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 723.
  • Graham, C. R. (2003). A model of norm development for computer-mediated teamwork. Small Group Research, 34(3), 322352.
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397431.
  • Hathorn, L. G., & Ingram, A. L. (2002a). Online collaboration: Making it work. Educational Technology, 42(1), 3340.
  • Hathorn, L. G., & Ingram, A. L. (2002b). Cooperation and collaboration using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 325347.
  • Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved June 25, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html
  • Henri, F., & Rigault, C. (1996). Collaborative distance education and computer conferencing. In T. T.Liao (Ed.), Advanced Educational Technology: Research Issues and Future Potential (pp. 4576). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (4). Retrieved July 12, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
  • Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A.Barab, R.Kling, & J. H.Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (338376). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hough, B., Smithey, M., & Evertson, C. (2004). Using computer-mediated communication to create virtual communities of practice for intern teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 361386.
  • Huysman, M., Steinfield, C., Jang, C. Y., David, K., Veld, M., Poot, J., & Mulder, I. (2003). Virtual teams and the appropriation of communication technology: Exploring the concept of media stickiness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(4), 411436.
  • Im, Y., & Lee, O. (2003–2004). Pedagogical implications of online discussion for preservice teacher training. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 155170.
  • Ingram, A. L., Hathorn, L. G., & Evans, A. (2000). Beyond chat on the Internet. Computers & Education, 35, 2125.
  • Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 726.
  • Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 5774.
  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(3), 4766.
  • Kitchen, D., & McDougall, D. (1998–1999). Collaborative learning on the Internet. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(3), 245258.
  • Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. London: Sage Publications.
  • Levin, B., He, Y., & Robbins, H. (2004). Comparative study of synchronous and asynchronous online case discussions. In C.Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 551558). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Levin, B., He, Y., & Robbins, H. (2006). Comparative analysis of preservice teachers’ reflective thinking in synchronous versus asynchronous online case discussions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 439460.
  • McLoughlin, C. (2002). Computer supported teamwork: An integrative approach to evaluating cooperative learning in an online environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 227254.
  • Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 5565. Retrieved June 25, 2007 from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/pdf/v7n3_meyer.pdf
  • Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149158.
  • Motteram, G. (2001). The role of synchronous communication in fully distance education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 131149.
  • O’Malley, C. (1991). Editor’s preface. In C.O’Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. ivvii). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • O’Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S. K., & Lippert, L. R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Interaction, 23(4), 464490.
  • Paulus, T. M. (2006). Challenge or connect? Dialogue in online learning environments. Journal of Computing and Higher Education, 18(1), 329.
  • Paulus, T. M. (2005). Collaborative and cooperative approaches to online group work: The impact of task type. Distance Education, 26(1), 109123.
  • Paulus, T. M. (2004). Collaboration or cooperation? Small group interactions in a synchronous educational environment. In T. S.Roberts (Ed.), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education (pp. 100124). Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
  • Pena-Shaef, J., Martin, W., & Gray, G. (2001). An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(1), 4168.
  • Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162177.
  • Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Using web-based, group communication systems to support case study learning at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3(2). Retrieved June 25, 2007 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/107/186
  • Schweitzer, K., Paechter, M., & Weidenmann, B. (2003). Blended learning as a strategy to improve collaborative task performance. Journal of Educational Media, 23(2–3), 211224.
  • Stephens, A. C., & Hartmann, C. E. (2004). A successful professional development project’s failure to promote online discussion about teaching mathematics with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 5773.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Walther, J. B. (1999, May). Visual cues and computer-mediated communication: Don’t look before you leap. Annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Weick, K. E. (1990). Technology as equivoque: Sense making in new technologies. In P. S.Goodman, L. S.Sproull, & Associates (Eds.), Technology and Organizations (pp. 144). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Whipp, J. L. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in online discussions: Helping prospective teachers think deeply about field experiences in urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 321333.
  • Zhao, Y., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., Smith, B., & Tan, H. S. (2004). The non-neutrality of technology: A theoretical analysis and empirical study of computer-mediated communication technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 2354.