SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Brady, H. E. (1999). Political participation. In J. P.Robinson, P. R.Shaver, & L. S.Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Political Attitudes (pp. 737801). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Bryce, J. (1973). The American Commonwealth (Vol. 3). London: Macmillan. (Original work published in 1888.)
  • Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398422.
  • Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (1992). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In R.Goodin & P.Pettit (Eds.), Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology (pp. 143155). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Curtin, D. (1997). Postnational Democracy: The European Union in Search of a Political Philosophy. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32, 554571.
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315344.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt.
  • Eveland, W. P. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177193.
  • Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to behavior process. Journal of Consumer Resources, 16, 28088.
  • Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891913.
  • Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Fishkin, J. S. (1999). Toward a deliberative democracy: Experimenting with an ideal. In S.Elkin & K. E.Soltan (Eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions (pp. 279290). State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Fishkin, J. S., & Luskin, R. C. (1999). Bringing deliberation to the democratic dialogue. In M.McCombs & A.Reynolds (Eds.), The Poll With a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication (pp. 338). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gastil, J., & Dillard, J. P. (1999). Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication, 16, 323.
  • Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Eds). (2005). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society (T. McGarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reasoning (T. McGarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hayes, A. F. (1998). SPSS procedures for approximate randomization tests. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 536543.
  • Herbst, S. (1999). The cultivation of conversation. In M.McCombs & A.Reynolds (Eds.), The Poll With a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication (pp. 187210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Katz, E. (1992). On parenting a paradigm: Gabriel Tarde’s agenda for opinion and communication research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 8085.
  • Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361385.
  • Kinder, D. R. (2002). Pale democracy: Opinion and action in post-war America. In E. D.Mansfield & R.Sisson (Eds.), The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics (pp. 104162). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
  • Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283301.
  • Loycano, M. E. (1992). National Issue Forums Literacy Program: Linking Literacy and Citizenship, 1988–1991. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
  • Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., & Jowell, R. (2002). Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 455488.
  • Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., & Iyengar, S. (2004, May). Considered opinions on U.S. foreign policy: Face-to-face versus online deliberative polling. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
  • Mathews, D. (1994). Politics for People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • Mendelberg, T., & Oleske, J. (2000). Race and public deliberation. Political Communication, 17, 169191.
  • Mendelberg, T. (2002). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In M. X.Delli Carpini, L.Huddy, & R.Shapiro (Eds.), Research in Micropolitics: Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation (pp. 151193). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602662.
  • Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review. 93, 2332.
  • Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85, 14071413.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, S. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689715.
  • Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19, 95112.
  • Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Reef, M. J., & Knoke, D. (1999). Political alienation and efficacy. In J. P.Robinson, P. R.Shaver, & L. S.Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Political Attitudes (pp. 413464). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451484.
  • Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation, Political Theory, 25, 347376.
  • Shane, P. M. (2004). The electronic federalist: The Internet and eclectic institutionalization of democratic legitimacy. In P. M.Shane (Ed.), Democracy Online (pp. 6582). New York: Routledge.
  • Schkade, D., Sunstein, C., & Kahneman, D. (2000). Deliberating about dollars: The severity shift. Columbia Law Review, 100, 11391175.
  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M.Lea (Ed.), Contexts of Computer–M:w ediated Communication (pp. 3065). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  • Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tarde, G. (1969). Opinion and conversation. In T.N. Clark (Ed.), Gabriel Tarde on Communication and Social Influence (pp. 297318). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in French in 1898.)
  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 5290.
  • Warren, M. (1992). Democratic theory and self-transformation. American Political Science Review, 86, 823.