SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anonymous. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8(4), 381407.
  • Archer J. L. (1980). Self-disclosure. In D.Wegner & R.Vallacher (Eds.), The Self in Social Psychology (pp. 183204). London: Oxford University.
  • Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of anonymity and group identification on progroup behavior in computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research, 33(5), 590610.
  • Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1983). The disclosure-liking relationship: Effects of self-perception, order of disclosure, and topical similarity. Human Communication Research, 10(2), 269281.
  • Blood, R. (2002). The Weblog Handbook: Practical Advice on Creating and Maintaining Your Blog. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
  • Bortree, D. S. (2005). Presentation of self on the Web: An ethnographic study of teenage girls’ weblogs. Education, Communication, and Information Journal, 5(1), 2540.
  • Buhrmester, D., Furman, W., Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 9911008.
  • Calvert, C. (2000). Voyeur Nation: Media, Privacy, and Peering in Modern Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Davis, J. P. (2002). The experience of ‘bad’ behavior in online social spaces: A survey of online users. Retrieved April 29, 2005 from http://research.microsoft.com/scg/papers/Bad%20Behavior%20survey.pdf
  • Dearstyne, B. W. (2005). Blogs: The new information revolution? Information Management Journal, 39(5), 3844.
  • Deitering, A.-M., & Huston, S. (2004). Weblogs and the “middle space” for learning. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(4), 273278.
  • Derlega, V. L., & Chaikin, A. L. (1977). Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 102115.
  • Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-Disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace (pp. 2959). London: Routledge.
  • Drezner, D. W., & Farrell, H. (2004, July). The power and politics of blogs. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Dron, J. (2003). The blog and the borg: A collective approach to e-learning. In G.Richards (Ed.). Proceedings of World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 440443). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Etzioni A., & Etzioni O. (1999). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities: A comparative analysis. The Information Society, 15(4), 241248.
  • Hartelius, E. J. (2005). A content-based taxonomy of blogs and the formation of a virtual community. Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research, 4, 7191.
  • Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. Retrieved January 6, 2004 from http://www.blogninja.com/DDGDD04.doc
  • Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Kouper, I., & Wright, E. (2006). Longitudinal content analysis of weblogs: 2003–2004. In M.Tremayne (Ed.), Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media (pp. 320). London: Routledge.
  • Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), article 1. Retrieved March 1, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html
  • Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. (1990). The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14(3), 312321.
  • Johnson, R. D., & Downing, L. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 15321538.
  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177192.
  • Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-Disclosure: An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), article 1. Retrieved June, 10, 2006 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/kelleher.html
  • Laurenceau, J-P., Barrett, L. F., & Peitromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 12381251.
  • Lawson-Borders, G., & Kirk, R. (2005). Blogs in campaign communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(4), 548559.
  • Lea, M., Spears, R., & De Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 526537.
  • Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 3447.
  • Marx, G. T. (1999). What’s in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. The Information Society, 15(2), 99112.
  • Marx, G. T. (2001). Identity and anonymity: Some conceptual distinctions and issues for research. In J.Caplan & J.Torpey (Eds.), Documenting Individual Identity (pp. 311327). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681694.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 5775.
  • McNeill, L. (2003). Teaching an old genre new tricks: The diary on the Internet. Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 26(1), 2448.
  • Merola, N., & Hancock, J. (2005, May). Another look at SIDE: Visual and personal identifiability in computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, New York.
  • Miller, C. R., & Shepherd, D. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In L.Gurak, S.Antonijevic, L.Johnson, C.Ratliff, & J.Reyman (Eds.), Into the Blogosphere. Retrieved October 16, 2006 from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action_pf.html
  • Miura, A., & Yamashita, K. (2004). Why do people publish weblogs? An online survey of weblog authors in Japan. In K.Morgan, C. A.Brebbia, J.Sanchez, & A.Voiskounsky (Eds.), Human Perspectives in the Internet Society: Culture, Psychology and Gender (pp. 4350). Southampton, UK: WIT.
  • Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., & Gumbrecht, M. (2004). Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 222231). Chicago, IL: ACM.
  • Nissenbaum, H. (1999). The meaning of anonymity in an information age. The Information Society, 15(2), 141144.
  • Nowak, K., Watt, J., & Walther, J. B. (2005). The influence of synchrony and sensory modality on the person perception process in computer-mediated groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 3. Retrieved December 1, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/nowak.html
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2004, May). The blogger revolution? Audiences as media producers. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Confession, inhibition, and disease. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 211244). New York: Academic.
  • Perlman, D., & Fehr, B. (1987). The development of intimate relationships. In D.Perlman & S. W.Duck (Eds.), Intimate Relationships: Development, Dynamics, and Deterioration (pp. 1342). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2000). Refining the cognitive definition: Deindividuation effects in common bond vs. common identity groups. In T.Postmes, R.Spears, M.Lea, & S.Reicher (Eds.), Side Effects Centre Stage: Recent Developments in Studies of De-Individuation in Groups (pp. 6378). Amsterdam: KNAW.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 12431254.
  • Rainie, L. (2005). The state of blogging. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved July 1, 2007 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_blogging_data.pdf
  • Rubin, Z. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(3), 233260.
  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Scott, C. R. (2004). Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations. In S.Drucker (Ed.), Free Speech Yearbook (vol. 41, pp. 127141). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
  • Schroeder, R. (2003, August). Blogging to disseminate best online learning practices and technology news. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.
  • Seltzer, T. (2005, August). The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building. Paper presented at the annual convention of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Antonio, TX.
  • Serfaty, V. (2004). The Mirror and the Veil: An Overview of American Online Diaries and Blogs. New York: Rodopi.
  • Sorapure, M. (2003). Screening moments, scrolling lives: Diary writing on the Web. Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 26(1), 123.
  • Suler, J. R., & Phillips, W. L. (1998). The bad boys of cyberspace: Deviant behavior in a multimedia chat community. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 275294.
  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317348.
  • Trammell, K. D., & Ferdig, R. E. (2004). Pedagogical implications of classroom blogging. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(4), 6064.
  • Trammell, K. D., & Keshelashvili, A. (2005). Examining the new influencers: A self-presentation study of A-List blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 968982.
  • Trammell, K. D., Williams, A. P., Postelnicu, M., & Landreville, K. D. (2006). Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate Web sites and blogs through text and technical features. Mass Communication and Society, 9(1), 2144.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Van House, N. (2004). Weblogs: Credibility and collaboration in an online world. Submitted for CSCW Workshop on Trust, October, 2004 [workshop subsequently cancelled]. Retrieved October 16, 2006 from http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/~vanhouse/Van%20House%20trust%20workshop.pdf
  • Viégas, F. B. (2005). Bloggers’ expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 12. Retrieved December 1, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/viegas.html
  • Wallace, P. (1999). The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W.J. Arnold & D.Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 237307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.