SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Acock, A., Clarke, H. D., & Stewart, M. C. (1985). A new model for old measures: A covariance structure analysis of political efficacy. The Journal of Politics, 47(4), 10621084.
  • Adkins, M., & Brashers, D. E. (1995). The power of language in computer-mediated groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 289322.
  • Bokhorst-Heng, W. (1998). Language planning and management in Singapore. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore (pp. 287309). Singapore: Oxford University Press.
  • Bornstein, B. H. (1995). Memory processes in elderly eyewitnesses: What we know and what we don’t know. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 337348.
  • Craig, S. C., Niemi, R., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289314.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organization Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In Smith, M. A. & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace (pp. 2959). New York: Routledge.
  • Eagly, A. L., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Javanonvich, Inc.
  • Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (4). Retrieved December 20, 2003 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
  • Fang, L. (2007). Perceiving the useful, enjoyable and effective: A case study of the e-learning experience of tertiary students in Singapore. Educational Media International, 44(3), 237253.
  • Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325340.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media and Society, 9(2), 319342.
  • Foley, J. A. (Ed.). (1998). New Englishes: The Case of Singapore. Singapore University Press.
  • Foley, J. A., Kandiah, T., Bao, Z., Gupta, A. F., Alsagoff, L., Ho, C. L., Wee, L., Talib, I. S., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. (1998). English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
  • Gupta, A. F. (1998a). The situation of English in Singapore. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore (pp. 106126). Singapore: Oxford University Press.
  • Gupta, A. F. (1998b). Singapore Colloquial English? Or deviant Standard English? In J. Tent & F. Mugler (Eds.), SICOL, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Oceanic Linguistics: Vol. 1 (pp. 4357). Canberra, Australia: Pacific Linguistics.
  • Gupta, A. F. (2001, June). English in the linguistic ecology of Singapore. Paper presented at The Cultural Politics of English as a World Language, Freiburg, Germany. Retrieved October 20, 2003 from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/english/staff/afg/freiburg.doc
  • Gupta, A. F. (2006). Singlish on the web. In A. Hashim & N. Hassan (Eds.), Varieties of English in SouthEast Asia and Beyond (pp. 1937). Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Ho, C. L., & Alsagoff, L. (1998). English as the common language in multicultural Singapore. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore (pp. 201217). Singapore: Oxford University Press.
  • Hoffman, R. R. (1998). How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology. In R. Williams, W. Faulkner, & J. Fleck (Eds.), Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives (pp. 81100). London: MacMillan Press Ltd.
  • Jessmer, S. L., & Anderson, D. (2001). The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North American Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 115.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2000). Civil political discourse in a democracy: The contribution of psychology. Journal of Peace Psychology, 6(4), 291317.
  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 11231134.
  • Kuo, E. C. Y. (1977). The status of English in Singapore: A sociolinguistic analysis. In W. Crewe (Ed.), The English Language in Singapore (pp. 1033). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press Sdn Bhd.
  • Liu, Y., & Ginther, D. W. (2001, April). Instructional strategies for achieving a positive impression in computer-mediated communication distance education courses. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, TN. Retrieved March 20, 2004 from http://www.mtsu.edu/~itconf/proceed01/16.pdf
  • Liu, Y., Ginther, D., & Zelhart, P. (2001). How do frequency and duration of messaging affect impression development in computer-mediated communication? Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7 (10), 893–913. Retrieved June 6, 2007 from http://www.jucs.org/jucs_7_10/how_do_frequency_and/Liu_Y.pdf
  • Llamzon, T. A. (1977). Emerging patterns in the English Language situation in Singapore today. In W. Crewe (Ed.), The English Language in Singapore (pp. 3445). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press Sdn Bhd.
  • McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 6572.
  • Ng, E. W. J., & Detenber, B. H. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in on-line political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 4. Retrieved June 20, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/ng.html
  • Ooi, G. L., Tan, E. S., & Koh, G. (1998, October). Survey of state-society relations: Social indicators research project, executive summary report. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 123205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689715.
  • Rafaeli, S. (1986). The electronic bulletin board: A computer driven mass medium. Computers and the Social Sciences, 2(3), 123136.
  • Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85108.
  • Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (Eds.) (1994). Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Scott, C. R. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8, 381407.
  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
  • Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 974991.
  • Smith, V., Siltanen, S. A., & Hosman, L. A. (1998). The effects of powerful and powerless speech styles and speaker expertise on impression formation and attitude change. Communication Research Reports, 15(1), 2735.
  • Sparks, C. (2001). The Internet and the global public sphere. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (pp. 7595). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon: The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427459.
  • Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 14921512.
  • Sternthal, B., Phillips, L. W., & Dholakia, R. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: A situational analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(3), 285314.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2003). Diversity of political conversation on the Internet: Users’ perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8 (3). Retrieved March 19, 2003 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.html
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 5290.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 334.