SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Atkin, D., & LaRose, R. (1994). An analysis of the information services adoption literature. In J.Hanson (Ed.), Advances in Telematics (Vol. 2, pp. 91110). New York: Ablex.
  • Bantz, C. R. (1982). Exploring uses and gratifications: A comparison of reported uses of television and reported uses of favorite program type. Communication Research, 9, 352379.
  • Campbell, D. T. (1960). Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. The American Psychologist, 15, 546553.
  • Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185204.
  • Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002). Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 191229.
  • Cohen, A. A., Levy, M. R., & Golden, K. (1988). Children’s uses and gratifications of home VCRs: Evolution or revolution. Communication Research, 15, 772780.
  • Davies, C. (1997). Organizational influences on the university electronic library. Information Processing and Management, 33(3), 377392.
  • Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319340.
  • Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions, and behavior impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 475487.
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 9821003.
  • DeLacey, B., & Leonard, D. (2002). Case study on technology and distance in education at the Harvard Business School. Educational Technology & Society, 5(2). Retrieved May 8, 2005 from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_2_2002/delacey.html
  • Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 921.
  • Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis’s perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: A confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 839869.
  • Dutton, W. H., Cheong, P. H., & Park, N. (2004a). An ecology of constraints on e-learning in higher education: The case of virtual learning environment. Prometheus, 22(2), 131149.
  • Dutton, W. H., Cheong, P. H., & Park, N. (2004b). The social shaping of a virtual learning environment: The case of a university-wide course management system. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2(1), 6980. Retrieved October 8, 2004 from http://www.ejel.org/volume-2/vol2-issue1/issue1-art3-dutton-cheong-park.pdf
  • Dutton, W. H., & Loader, B. D. (2002). Digital Academe: New Media and Institutions in Higher Education and Learning. London: Taylor and Francis/Routledge.
  • Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 155174.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fredrickson, S. (1999). Untangling a tangled Web: An overview of Web-based instruction programs. T.H.E. Journal, 26(11), 67.
  • Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921950.
  • Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J.Fulk & C. W.Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 117140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Green, K. (2001). The 12th National Survey of Computing and Information Technology in American Higher Education. Encino, CA: Campus Computing.
  • Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W-M., & Tam, K-Y. (2002). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97124.
  • Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 91112.
  • Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21, 279302.
  • Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S., & Womack, D. F. (1993). Building Communication Theory (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R. A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioural intentions to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28, 357389.
  • James, M. L., Wotring, C. E., & Forrest, E. J. (1995). An exploratory study of the perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(1), 3050.
  • Jiang, J. J., Hsu, M., & Klein, G. (2000). E-commerce user behavior model: An empirical study. Human Systems Management, 19, 265276.
  • Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption belief. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183214.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G.Blumler & E.Katz (Eds.), The Use of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (pp. 1932). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217232.
  • Kuehn, S. A. (1994). Computer mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education, 43, 171183.
  • LaRose, R., & Atkin, D. (1992). Audiotext and the re-invention of the telephone as a mass medium. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 413421.
  • Lin, C. A. (1993). Modeling the gratification-seeking process of television viewing. Human Communication Research, 20, 224244.
  • Lin, C. A. (1998). Exploring personal computer adoption dynamics. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 95112.
  • Lin, C. A. (1999). Online-service adoption likelihood. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), 7989.
  • Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2, 173191.
  • Miller, T. E. (1996). Segmenting the Internet. American Demographics, 18(7), 4852.
  • Morgan, G. (2003, May). Faculty use of course management system. Paper published by the Educause Center for Applied Research (ECAR). Washington, DC & Boulder, CO.
  • Neuendorf, K. A., Atkin, D., & Jeffres, L. W. (1998). Understanding adopters of audio information innovations. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 8093.
  • Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 413.
  • Palmgreen, P. (1984). Uses and gratifications: A theoretical perspective. Communication Yearbook, 8, 2055.
  • Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years. In K. E.Rosengren, L. A.Wenner, & P.Palmgreen (Eds.), Mass Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives (pp. 1137). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175196.
  • Radcliffe, D. (2002). Technological and pedagogical convergence between work-based and campus-based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 5(2). Retrieved May 12, 2005 from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_2_2002/radcliffe.html
  • Rafaeli, S. (1986). The electronic bulletin board: A computer-driven mass medium. Computers and the Social Sciences, 2, 123136.
  • Reagan, J. (1987). Classifying adopters and nonadopters for technologies using political activity, media use and demographic variables. Telematics and Informatics, 4, 316.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Rosengren, K. E. (1974). Uses and gratifications: A paradigm outlined. In J. G.Blumler & E.Katz (Eds.), The Use of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (pp. 269289). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Rosengren, K. E., & Windahl, S. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In D.McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of Mass Communication (pp. 166194). Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
  • Rubin, A. M. (1986). Uses, gratifications, and media effects research. In J.Bryant & D.Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives on Media Effects (pp. 281301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rubin, A. M. (1993). Audience activity and media use. Communication Monographs, 60, 98105.
  • Rubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In J.Bryant & D.Zillman (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 463482). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J.Bryant & D.Zillman (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (2nd ed.) (pp. 525548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rubin, A. M., & Bantz, C. R. (1987). Utility of videocassette recorders. In J. L.Salvaggio & J.Bryant (Eds.), Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Consumer Use (pp. 181195). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 337.
  • Stafford, M. R., & Stern, B. (2002). Consumer bidding behavior on Internet auction sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(1), 135150.
  • Swanson, E. B. (1988). Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap Between Design and Utilization. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  • Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., & Tam, K-Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 215242.
  • Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favourable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239260.
  • Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. In W. H.Dutton (Ed.), Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities (pp. 5368). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, F., Strover, S., & Grant, A. E. (1994). Social aspects of new media technologies. In J.Bryant & D.Zillman (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 463482). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Windahl, S. (1981). Uses and gratifications at the crossroads. Mass Communications Review Yearbook, 2, 174185.