SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, R. G. (1998). The demise of territorial determinism. In R. G.Adams & G.Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 153182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baym, N. K. (2002). Interpersonal life online. In L.Lievrouw & S.Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of New Media (pp. 6276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social interactions across media. New Media and Society, 6(3), 299318.
  • Bonebrake, K. (2002). College students’ Internet use, relationship formation, and personality correlates. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5(6), 551557.
  • Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using email for personal relationships. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 530549.
  • Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 243266.
  • Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford’s (Eds.), Communication and Relational Maintenance (pp. 322). New York: Academic Press, Inc.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 3746.
  • Cummings, J., & Kraut, R. (2002). Domesticating computers and the Internet. The Information Society, 18, 221231.
  • Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Patterns of communication channel use in the maintenance of long-distance relationships. Communication Research Reports, 19(2), 118129.
  • Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate Relationships. New York: Free Press.
  • Fehr, B. (2000). The life cycle of friendship. In C.Hendrick, & S.Hendrick (Eds.), Close Relationships: A Sourcebook (pp. 7182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6(1), 4758.
  • Guldner, G. T., & Swensen, C. H. (1995). Time spent together and relationship quality: Long-distance relationships as a test case. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(2), 313320.
  • Harwood, J. (2000). Communication media use in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 5678.
  • Hughes, R., Jr., & Hans, J. D. (2001) Computers, the Internet, and families. Journal of Family Issues, 22(6), 778792.
  • Johnson, A. J. (2001). Examining the maintenance of friendships: Are there differences between geographically close and long-distance friends? Communication Quarterly, 49(4), 424435.
  • Johnson, A. J., Haigh, M., Becker, J. A. H., Craig, E. A., & Wigley, S. (2004, November). College students’ use of email to maintain relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Johnson, A. J., Haigh, M., Craig, E. A., & Becker, J. A. H. (2005, November). Defining and measuring relational closeness: The test case of close long-distance friendships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Boston, MA.
  • Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: Ftf, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 3. Retrieved December 14, 2007 http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/kim.html
  • Knox, D., Zusman, M. E., Daniels, V., & Brantley, A. (2002). Absence makes the heart grow fonder?: Long-distance dating relationships among college students. College Student Journal, 36(3), 364367.
  • Ledbetter, A. M. (under review). Chronemic cues and sex differences in relational email: Perceiving immediacy and supportive message quality.
  • Odell, P., Korgen, K., Schumacher, P., & Delucchi, M. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 855862.
  • O’Sullivan, P. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403431.
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2002a). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Retrieved October 15, 2005, from http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_College_Report.pdf
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2002b). Getting serious online: As Americans gain experience, they use the Web more at work, write emails with more significant content, perform more online transactions, and pursue more activities online. Retrieved October 15, 2005 from http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Getting_Serious_Online3ng.pdf
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project (2004). The Internet and daily life: Many Americans use the Internet in everyday activities, but traditional offline habits still dominate. Retrieved October 11, 2007 from http://www.pewInternet.org/PPF/r/131/report_display.asp
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project (2007a). Daily Internet activities. Retrieved October 11, 2007 from http://www.pewInternet.org/trends/Daily_Internet_Activities_8.28.07.htm
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project (2007b). Internet activities. Retrieved October 11, 2007 from http://www.pewInternet.org/trends/Internet_Activities_8.28.07.htm
  • Rabby, M. K. (1997, November). Maintaining relationships via electronic mail. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Rabby, M. K., & Walther, J. B. (2003). Computer-mediated communication effects on relationship formation and maintenance. In D. J.Canary & M.Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication (pp. 141162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rohlfing, M. E. (1995). “Doesn’t anybody stay in one place anymore?” An exploration of the under-studied phenomenon of long-distance relationships. In J. T.Wood & S.Duck (Eds.), Under-Studied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track (pp. 173196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Stafford, L. (2005). Maintaining Long-Distance and Cross-Residential Relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217242.
  • Stafford, L., Kline, S., & Dimmick, J. (1999). Home email: Relational maintenance and gratification opportunities. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(4), 659669.
  • Stephen, T. (1986). Communication and interdependence in geographically separated relationships. Human Communication Research, 13(2), 191210.
  • Tognoli, J. (2003). Leaving home: Homesickness, place attachment, and transition among residential college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 18(1), 3548.
  • Trice, A. (2002). First semester college students’ email to parents: I. Frequency and content related to parenting style. College Student Journal, 36(3), 327334.
  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 151176.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 143.
  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L.Knapp & J. A.Daly (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (3rd ed., pp. 529563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walther, J. B., & Tidwell, L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 5(4), 355378.
  • Wang, H., & Andersen, P. A. (2007, May). Computer-mediated communication in relationship maintenance: An examination of self-disclosure in long-distance friendships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Wright, K. B. (2004). Online relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively Internet-based and primarily Internet-based relationships. Communication Studies, 55(2), 239253.