SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abram, C. (2007, Feb 23). “Have a taste…”. The Facebook blog. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2245132130
  • Allen, S. (2007, Apr 12). “Linked in reaches 10 million users”. Linked Intelligence. Retrieved July 29, 2007 from http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-reaches-10-million-users/
  • Burton, M. C., & Walther, J. B. (2001). The value of web log data in use-based web design and testing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (3). Retrieved March 1, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/burton.html
  • Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625648.
  • Clifford, M. M. & Walster, E. (1973). The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. The Sociology of Education, 46, 248258.
  • Comscore. (2007, July 31). Social networking goes global. Retrieved Aug 2, 2007 from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1555
  • Berry, D. S. & Miller, K. M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 6277.
  • Boyd, D. (2006, December). Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12). Retrieved June 5, 2007 from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html
  • Boyd, D. (2007, May). Error: You must be someone’s friend to comment on them. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association, San Francisco.
  • Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004, October). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 7182.
  • Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 2959). New York: Routledge.
  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681735.
  • Eagly, A., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but… A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109128.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 1. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
  • Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 981993.
  • Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things make a big difference. New York: Brown, Little, & Co.
  • Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005, November 7, 2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Paper presented at the WPES’05, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
  • Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychological Quarterly, 58, 108122.
  • Kleck, C. A., Reese, C. A., Behnken, D. Z., & Sundar, S. S. (2007, May). The company you keep and the image you project: Putting your best face forward in online social networks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
  • Krantz, M. (1987). Physical attractiveness and popularity: A predictive study. Psychological Reports, 60, 723726.
  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390423.
  • Lee, L., Adams, G. & Dobson, W. (1984). Male and female attributions and social influence towards a physically attractive female. Journal of Psychology, 117, 97103.
  • Levine, T. R., & Banas, J. (2002). One-tailed F-tests in communication research. Communication Monographs, 69, 132143.
  • Levy, S. (2007, Aug 20). Facebook grows up. Newsweek, pp. 4146.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261266.
  • McCroskey, J. C., Hamilton, P. R., & Weiner, A. M. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1, 4252.
  • O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251274.
  • O’Murchu, I., Breslin, J. G., & Decker, S. (2004). Online social and business networking communities. Retrieved March 12, 2006, from http://www.deri.ie/fileadmin/documents/DERI-TR-2004-08-11.pdf
  • Osborne, J. (2002). Notes on the use of data transformations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(6). Retrieved September 13, 2007 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=6
  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125144.
  • Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal networks and personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ramirez, Jr., A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213228.
  • Tanis, M. (2003). Cues to identity in CMC: The impact on person perception and subsequent interaction outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317348.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 11241130.
  • Vazire, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 123132.
  • Vanden Boogart, M. R. (2006). Uncovering the social impact of Facebook on a college campus. Unpublished masters thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. Retrieved July 5, 2007 from http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/2097/181/1/MatthewVandenBoogart2006.pdf
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 5290.
  • Walther, J. B. (2006). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or: (and the net: (‘s with you, :) and you:) alone. In V.Manusov & M. L.Patterson (Eds.), Handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 461479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L.Knapp & J. A.Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 2849.