• Please log in or register to access this feature.
You have free access to this content

Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook

  1. Stephanie Tom Tong1,†,
  2. Brandon Van Der Heide1,‡,
  3. Lindsey Langwell1,§,
  4. Joseph B. Walther2,¶

Article first published online: 29 APR 2008

DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x

Issue

Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volume 13, Issue 3, pages 531–549, April 2008

Additional Information

How to Cite

Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L. and Walther, J. B. (2008), Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13: 531–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Communication

  2. 2

    Departments of Communication and Telecommunication, Information Studies & Media Michigan State University

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 29 APR 2008
  2. Article first published online: 29 APR 2008

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (305K)

References

  • Abram, C. (2007, Feb 23). “Have a taste…”. The Facebook blog. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2245132130
  • Allen, S. (2007, Apr 12). “Linked in reaches 10 million users”. Linked Intelligence. Retrieved July 29, 2007 from http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-reaches-10-million-users/
  • Burton, M. C., & Walther, J. B. (2001). The value of web log data in use-based web design and testing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (3). Retrieved March 1, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/burton.html
  • Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625–648.
  • Clifford, M. M. & Walster, E. (1973). The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. The Sociology of Education, 46, 248–258.
  • Comscore. (2007, July 31). Social networking goes global. Retrieved Aug 2, 2007 from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1555
  • Berry, D. S. & Miller, K. M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 62–77.
  • Boyd, D. (2006, December). Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12). Retrieved June 5, 2007 from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html
  • Boyd, D. (2007, May). Error: You must be someone’s friend to comment on them. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association, San Francisco.
  • Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004, October). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82.
  • Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29–59). New York: Routledge.
  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681–735.
  • Eagly, A., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but… A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 1. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
    Direct Link:
  • Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 981–993.
  • Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things make a big difference. New York: Brown, Little, & Co.
  • Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005, November 7, 2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Paper presented at the WPES’05, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
  • Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychological Quarterly, 58, 108–122.
  • Kleck, C. A., Reese, C. A., Behnken, D. Z., & Sundar, S. S. (2007, May). The company you keep and the image you project: Putting your best face forward in online social networks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
  • Krantz, M. (1987). Physical attractiveness and popularity: A predictive study. Psychological Reports, 60, 723–726.
  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.
  • Lee, L., Adams, G. & Dobson, W. (1984). Male and female attributions and social influence towards a physically attractive female. Journal of Psychology, 117, 97–103.
  • Levine, T. R., & Banas, J. (2002). One-tailed F-tests in communication research. Communication Monographs, 69, 132–143.
  • Levy, S. (2007, Aug 20). Facebook grows up. Newsweek, pp. 41–46.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266.
  • McCroskey, J. C., Hamilton, P. R., & Weiner, A. M. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1, 42–52.
    Direct Link:
  • O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251–274.
    Direct Link:
  • O’Murchu, I., Breslin, J. G., & Decker, S. (2004). Online social and business networking communities. Retrieved March 12, 2006, from http://www.deri.ie/fileadmin/documents/DERI-TR-2004-08-11.pdf
  • Osborne, J. (2002). Notes on the use of data transformations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(6). Retrieved September 13, 2007 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=6
  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144.
  • Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal networks and personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ramirez, Jr., A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213–228.
  • Tanis, M. (2003). Cues to identity in CMC: The impact on person perception and subsequent interaction outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348.
    Direct Link:
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.
  • Vazire, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 123–132.
  • Vanden Boogart, M. R. (2006). Uncovering the social impact of Facebook on a college campus. Unpublished masters thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. Retrieved July 5, 2007 from http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/2097/181/1/MatthewVandenBoogart2006.pdf
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90.
  • Walther, J. B. (2006). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or: (and the net: (‘s with you, :) and you:) alone. In V.Manusov & M. L.Patterson (Eds.), Handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 461–479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L.Knapp & J. A.Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28–49.
    Direct Link:
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (305K)