SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alter, S. (1977). Why Is man-computer interaction important for decision support systems? Interfaces, 7(2), 109115.
  • Ambre, J., Guard, R., Perveiler, F. M., Renner, J., & Rippen, H. (1997). Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet. Available online: http://www.mitretek.org/hiti/showcase/documents/criteria.html: Health Information Technology Institute of Mitretek Systems, Inc
  • Armstrong, A., & Hagel, J. I. (1996). The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 134140.
  • Barker, J., & Tucker, R. N. (1990). The interactive learning revolution: multimedia in education and Training. London: Kogan Page.
  • Bedell, S. E., Agrawal, A., & Petersen, L. E. (2004). A systematic critique of diabetes on the World Wide Web for patients and their physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73, 687694.
  • Berelson, B., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1948). The analysis of communication content. Chicago and New York: University of Chicago and Columbia University.
  • Berland, G. K., Elliott, M. N., Morales, L. S., & Algazy, J. I. (2001). Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(20), 26122621.
  • Blattberg, R. C., & Deighton, J. (1991). Interactive marketing: Exploiting the age of addressability. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 514.
  • Bryant, J., & Street Jr., R. L. (1988). From reactivity to activity to action: An evolving concept and weltanschauung in mass and interpersonal communication. In R. P.Hawkins & J. M.Wiemann & S.Pingree (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Process (pp. 162190). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bucy, E. P. (2004). Second generation net news: Interactivity and information accessibility in the online environment. The International Journal on Media Management, 6(1/2), 102113.
  • Bucy, E. P., & Chen-Chao, T. (2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, 9(3), 647.
  • Burke, K., Aytes, K., Chidambaram, L., & Johnson, J. J. (1999). A study of partially distributed work groups: The impact of media, location, and time on perceptions and performance. Small Group Research, 30(4), 453490.
  • Chang, T.-K., & Tai, Z. (2005). Mass communication research and the invisible college revisited: The changing landscape and emerging fronts in journalism-related studies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(3), 672694.
  • Chilcoat, Y., & DeWine, S. (1985). Teleconferencing and interpersonal communication perception. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 13(1), 1432.
  • Cho, C.-H., & Cheon, H. J. (2005). Cross-cultural comparisons of interactivity on corporate Web sites. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 99115.
  • Cho, C.-H., & Khang, H. (2006). The state of Internet-related research in communications, marketing, and advertising: 1994–2003. Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 143163.
  • Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 6577.
  • Curro, V., Buonuomo, P. S., Onesimo, R., DeRose, P., Vituzzi, A., DiTanna, G. L., & D’Atri, A. (2004). A quality evaluation methodology of health Web-pages for non-professionals. Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine, 29(2), 95107.
  • De Marsico, M., & Levialdi, S. (2004). Evaluating Web sites: Exploiting user’s expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 381416.
  • Gerbic, P., & Stacey, E. (2006). A purposive approach to content analysis: Designing analytical frameworks. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 4559.
  • Gonzalez, F. J. M., & Palacios, T. M. B. (2004). Quantitative evaluation of commercial Web sites: An empirical study of Spanish firms. International Journal of Information Management, 24, 313328.
  • Ha, L., & James, L. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business Web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457474.
  • Haeckel, S. H. (1998). About the nature and future of interactive marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 6371.
    Direct Link:
  • Hanssen, L., Jankowski, N. W., & Etienne, R. (1996). Interactivity from the perspective of communication studies. In N. W.Jankowski & L.Hanssen (Eds.), Contours of Multimedia: Recent Technological, Theoretical, and Empirical Developments (pp. 6173). Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
  • Hester, J. B. (1999). Using a Web-based interactive test as a learning tool. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 54(1), 3541.
  • Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hwang, J.-S., McMillan, S. J., & Lee, G. (2002). Corporate web sites as advertising: An analysis of message strategies and features. In A. MAbernathy (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 56). Auburn, AL: Auburn University.
  • Hwang, J.-S., McMillan, S. J., & Lee, G.. (2003). Corporate Web sites as advertising: An analysis of function, audience, and message strategy. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(2), Available http://jiad.org
  • Jankowski, N. W., Foot, K., Kluver, R., & Schneider, S. (2005). The Web and the 2004 EU election: Comparing political actor web sites in 11 EU member states. Information Polity, 10, 165176.
  • Jensen, J. F. (1998). Interactivity: Tracing a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 185204.
  • Keltner, K. (1998). Networked health information: Assuring quality control on the Internet. Federal Communications Law Journal, 50(2), 417439.
  • Kim, J., & McMillan, S. J.. (Forthcoming). Evaluation of Internet advertising research: A bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising.
  • Levins, I. (1999). Relationship marketing gets more personal – and it works. Healthcare PR & Marketing News, 8(25), 1.
  • Liu, Y. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 207216.
  • Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing: Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 5364.
  • Lynn, G. S., Lipp, S. M., Akgun, A. E., & Crotez Jr., A. (2002). Factors impacting the adoption and effectiveness of the World Wide Web in marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 3549.
  • Macias, W., & McMillan, S. J. (2008). The return of the house call: The role of internet-based interactivity in bringing health information home to older adults. Health Communication, 23(1), 111.
  • Macklin, B. (2006, September 28). Viral …and stealthy. emarketer.com.
  • Marvin, C. (1983). Space, time, and captive communications history. In M. S.Mander (Ed.), Communications in Transition (pp. 2038). New York: Prager.
  • Massey, B. L., & Levy, M. R. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism, and English-language Web newspapers in Asia. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 138151.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147174.
  • McMillan, S. J. (1998). Who pays for content? Funding in interactive media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(1), Available http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue1/mcmillan.html
  • McMillan, S. J. (1999). Health communication and the Internet: Relationships between interactive characteristics of the medium and site creators, content, and purpose. Health Communication, 11(4), 375390.
  • McMillan, S. J. (2000a). Interactivity is in the eye of the beholder: Function, perception, involvement, and attitude toward the Web site. In M. AShaver (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 7178). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
  • McMillan, S. J. (2000b). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 8098.
  • McMillan, S. J. (2002). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some Cyber-Places are More Interactive Than Others. New Media and Society, 4(2), 271291.
  • McMillan, S. J. (2005). The researchers and the concept: Moving beyond a blind examination of interactivity. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), Available online: http://jiad.org
  • McMillan, S. J., & Downes, E. J. (2000). Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society, 2(2), 157179.
  • McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 4154.
  • McMillan, S. J., Hwang, J.-S., & Lee, G. (2003). Effects of structural and perceptual factors on attitudes toward the website. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4), 400409.
  • McMillan, S. J., Kim, J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2004). Searching for the riddle in the Web site: Coding interactivity in online content analysis. In P. B.Rose (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 255262). Miami, FL: University of South Florida.
  • McMillan, S. J., Kim, J., McMahan, C., & Fall, L. T. (2006). Analyze this: Developing a coding scheme for measuring interactivity features in the context of state tourism Web sites. In J.Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 222231). Austin, TX: University of Texas.
  • Miles, I. (1992). When mediation is the message: How suppliers envisage new markets. In M.Lea (Ed.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 145167). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  • Moon, Y., & Nass, C. (1996). How “real” are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23(6), 651674.
  • Morahan-Martin, J. M. (2004). How Internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(5), 497510.
  • Nielsen, J., & Loranger, H. (2006). Prioritizing Web usability. Berkley, CA: New Riders.
  • Okazaki, S. (2005). Searching the Web for global brands: How American brands standardise their Web sites in Europe. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1/2), 87109.
  • Okazaki, S., & Rivas, J. A. (2002). A content analysis of multinationals’ Web communication strategies: Cross-cultural research framework and pre-testing. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12(5), 380390.
  • Paul, M. J. (2001). Interactive disaster communication on the Internet: A content analysis of sixty-four disaster relief home pages. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 739753.
  • Pavlou, P. A., & Stewart, D. W. (2000). Measuring the effects and effectiveness of interactive advertising: A research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), Available at: http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/pavlou
  • Phillips, B., & Lee, W.-N. (2005). Interactive animation: Exploring spokes-characters on the Internet. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 27(1), 117.
  • Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P.Hawkins & J. M.Wiemann & S.Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal process (pp. 110134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4), Available: http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
  • Reardon, K. K., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15(2), 284303.
  • Riffe, D., & Freitag, A. (1997). A content analysis of content analyses: Twenty-five years of journalism quarterly. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 873882.
  • Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Risk, A., & Petersens, C. (2002). Health information on the Internet: Quality issues and international initiatives. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(20), 27132715.
  • Ritterband, L. M., Cox, D. J., Gordon, T. L., Borowitz, S. M., Kovatchev, B. P., Walker, L. S., & Sutphen, J. L. (2006). Examining the added value of audio, graphics, and interactivity in an Internet intervention for pediatric encopresis. Children’s Health Care, 35(1), 4759.
  • Ruben, B. D. (1975). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and mass communication processes in individual and multi-person systems. In B. D.Ruben & J. Y.Kim (Eds.), General Systems Theory and Human Communication (pp. 164190). Rochelle Park, NJ: Hayden Book Co.
  • Schultz, T. (1999). Interactive options in online journalism: A content analysis of 100 U.S. newspapers. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5(1), Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/schultz.html
  • Shie, E., & Lenhart, A. (2004, 1 September). How Americans use instant messaging. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Instantmessage_Report.pdf [2006, 7 September]
  • Straubhaar, J., & LaRose, R. (1996). Communications media in the information society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.
  • Strauss, J., & Frost, R. (1999). Marketing on the Internet: Principles of online marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Sundar, S. S., & Kim, J. (2005). Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), N.PAG.
  • Tomasello, T. K. (2001). The status of Internet-based research in five leading communication journals, 1994-1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 659674.
  • Trammell, K. D., Williams, A. P., Postelnicu, M., & Landreville, K. D. (2006). Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate Web sites and blogs through text and technical features. Mass Communication & Society, 9(1), 2144.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • Walther, J. B., Pingree, S., Hawkins, R. P., & Buller, D. B. (2005). Attributes of interactive online health information systems. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(3), 2133.
  • Weare, C., & Lin, W.-Y. (2000). Content analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and challenges. Social Science Computer Review, 18(3), 272292.
  • Wells, W. D., & Chen, Q. (2000). The dimensions of commercial cyberspace. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), Available online: http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/wells/index.html
  • Wise, K., Hamman, B., & Thorson, K. (2006). Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue11/wise.html
  • Xie, H. (2000). Shifts of interactive intentions and information-seeking strategies in interactive information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(9), 841857.
  • Yun, G. W. (2007). Interactivity concepts examined: Response time, hypertext, role taking, and multimodality. Media Psychology, 9(3), 527548.
  • Zeltzer, D. (1992). Autonomy, interaction, and presence. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 127132.