SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adamic, L., & Adar, E. (2005). Friends and neighbors on the Web. Social Networks, 25, 211230.
  • Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. 2nd Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem: Aggregation, Analysis and Dynamics. Retrieved May 4, from 2005, http://www.blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf
  • Bahnisch, M. (2006). The political uses of blogs. In AxelBruns and JoanneJacobs (editors). Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 139149.
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
  • Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), Retrieved December 10, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2013/issue2001/boyd.ellison.html
  • Bruns, A. (2007). Methodologies for mapping the political blogosphere: An exploration using the issue crawler research tool. First Monday, 12(5), http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_5/bruns/index.html
  • Bruns, A., & Jacobs, J. (2006). Introduction. In: AxelBruns and JoanneJacobs (editors). Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Coleman, S. (2005). Blogs and the new politics of listening. Political Quarterly, 76(2), 273280.
  • Drezner, D. W., & Farell, H. (2004). The power and politics of blogs. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association. Retrieved August 4, 2006 from http://www.danieldrezner.com/research/blogpaperfinal.pdf
  • Edelman (2007). A Corporate Guide to the Global Blogosophere: The new model of peer-to-peer communication. A Korean translation. Seoul: Edelman Korea. http://www.edelman.co.kr/new/media/limage/edelman_blogosphere_guide_2007.pdf
  • Elmer, G., Ryan, P. M., Devereaux, Z., Langlois, G., Redden, J., & McKelvey, F. (2007). Election bloggers: Methods for determining political influence. First Monday, 12(4). Retrieved January 4, 2008 from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_4/elmer/index.html
  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1, 215239.
  • Goggin, G., & McLelland, M. (Eds.). (2008, forthcoming). Internationalizing Internet Studies. London: Routledge.
  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 136080.
  • Hague, R., & Uhm, S.-Y. (2005). Online groups and offline parties: Korean politics and the Internet. In RGibson, SWard, and PNixon. (Editors). Political Parties and the Internet: Net Gain? (pp. 195217). London: Routledge.
  • Halavais, A. (2006). Scholarly blogging: Moving toward the visible college. In: AxelBruns and JoanneJacobs (editors). Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 117126.
  • Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved August 4, 2007 from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/
  • Hara, N., & Jo, Y. (2007). Internet politics: A comparative analysis of U.S. and South Korea presidential campaigns, First Monday, 12(9), http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_9/hara/index.html
  • Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., & Kane, M. Y. (2005). Cross-ideological discussions among top conservative and liberal bloggers. In D. Drezner & H. Farrell (Eds.), The political promise of blogging. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Haythornthwaite, C., 2002. Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society 18, 385401.
  • Herring, S., Kouper, I., Paolillo, J. C., Scheidt. L. A., Tyworth, M., Welsch, P., Wright, E., & Yu, N. (2005). Conversation in the blogosphere: An analysis “From the bottom up”. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
  • Ho. K. C., Kluver, R. and Yang, K.. Eds. (2003). Asia.com: Asian encounters the Internet. London: Routledge.
  • Herring, S. C., Kouper, I., Scheidt, L. A., & Wright, E. (2004). Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs. In L.Gurak, S.Antonijevic, L.Johnson, C.Ratliff, & J.Reyman (Eds.), Into the Blogosphere. Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs. Retrieved August 13, 2007 from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/women_and_children.html
  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU, 2006). ITU Internet Report 2006: Digital life. http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/publications/digitalife/docs/digital-life-web.pdf
  • Johnson, E. (2006). Democracy defended: Polibloggers and the political press in America. Reconstruction: Studies in contemporary culture. 6(4). http://reconstruction.eserver.org/064/johnson.shtml
  • Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 3, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/kim.html
  • Kim, H., & Park, H. W. (2007). Web sphere analysis for political websites: The 2004 National Assembly election in South Korea. In Kluver, R., Jankowski, N., Foot, K., & Schneider, S. (Eds.). The internet and national elections: A comparative study of web campaigning. London: Routledge. pp. 226239.
  • Kim, H, Choi, J. Y., & Cho, J. (2008 forthcoming). Changing cleavage structure in new democracies: An empirical analysis of political cleavages in Korea. Electoral studies.
  • Korean Social Science Data Center (KSDC, 2004). A voter survey on 17th National Assembly election. Seoul: Korean Social Science Data Center. Korean. http://www.ksdc.re.kr/databank/
  • Lee, E.-J. (2004). Netizens and South Korean politics: Citizens’ power during the presidential election 2002, In I. Ducke (ed.), E-Democracy in East Asia? How the Internet affects politics and civil society in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Tokyo: Deutsches institute fur Japanstudien.
  • Lim, M. (2007). Beyond Technotopia: The internet and politics in Pacific Asia. The 5th International Convention of Asia Scholars, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Aug 2–5.
  • Marlow, C. A. (2006). Linking without thinking: Social ties among bloggers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
  • Merton R. K. (1987). Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology. 13. 128,
  • National Internet Development Agency of Korea (NIDA) (2007). Survey on the Computer and Internet Usage: Report about the second half of the year 2006. Seoul: NIDA.
  • Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht M. Swartz L. 2004. Why we blog. Communications of the ACM. 47(12), 4146.
  • Park, H. W., & Jankowski, N. (2008, under consideration for publication). A hyperlink network analysis of citizen blogs in South Korean politics. Javnost/The Public.
  • Park, H. W., & Kluver, R. (2008 forthcoming). Affiliation in political blogs in South Korea: Comparing online and offline social networks. In Goggin, G., & McLelland, M. (Eds.). Internationalizing Internet Studies. London: Routledge.
  • Park, H.W. and Lee, Y. (2008). The Korean Presidential Election of 2007: Five Years on from the “Internet Election”. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia. 7(1), 14. http://www.eastasia.at/download/park.pdf
  • Park, H.W., Thelwall, M., & Kluver, R. (2005). Political hyperlinking in South Korea: Technical indicators of ideology and content. Sociological Research Online, 10(3), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/3/park.html
  • Park, H.W., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(4). Retrieved July 29, 2006 from the world wide web http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue4/park.html
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2006, July 19). Bloggers: A portrait of the Internet’s new storytellers. Retrieved October 5, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/186/report_display.asp
  • Reynolds, G. (2006). Army of Davids: How markets and technology empower ordinary people to beat big media, big government, and other goliaths. New York: Nelson Current.
  • Rogers, R. (2004). Information politics on the Web, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Schmidt, J. (2007). Blogging practices: An analytical framework. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 13. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/schmidt.html
  • Skoric, M. M., Lin, C. S. C., Juan, H. T., Ruiting, P. F. (2007). Podcasting and politics: Is medium the message? A paper presented to the 1st international conference: “Living the Information Society: The Impact of ICTs on People, Work and Communities in Asia, ” Makati, Philippines, 2324 April.
  • Soon, C., & Kluver, R. (2007). The internet and online political communities in Singapore. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(3), 246265.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Thelwall, M. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Trammell, K. D. (2006). The blogging of the president. In Williams, A. P., & Tedesco, J. C. (Eds.). The internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 133146.
  • Williams, A. P., Trammell, K. D., Postelnicu, M., Landreville, K. D., & Martin, J. D. (2005). Blogging and hyperlinking: Use of the web to enhance viability during the 2004 US campaign. Journalism Studies, 6(2), 177186.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Woodward, W. (2006). Tories unveil their secret weapon: ‘webcameron’. Guardian, Sep 30. http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,,1884396,00.html