SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Ben-Artsy, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441449.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 125128.
  • Arkin, R.M. (1981). Self-presentational styles. In J.T.Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research (pp. 311333). New York: Academic Press.
  • Babad, E. (2001). On the conception and measurement of popularity: more facts and some straight conclusions. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 330.
  • Bargh, J.A., McKenna, K.Y.A., & Fitzsimons, G.M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 2248.
  • Baumeister, R.F., Tice, D.M., & Hutton, D.G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547479.
  • Borgatti, S.P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph visualization software. [Computer program]. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Boyatzis, C.J., Baloff, P., & Durieux, C. (1998). Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic success on early adolescent peer popularity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159(3), 337344.
  • Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D.Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 119142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved December 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
  • Brown, B.B. & Lohr, M.J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego-identity and symbolic-interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 4755.
  • Brown, J.D. & Marshall, M.A. (2001). Self-esteem and emotion: Some thoughts about feelings. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 575584.
  • Bukowski, W.M. & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In T.J.Berndt & G.W.Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 1545). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Bukowski, W.M., Sippola, L., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A.F. (2000). Pages from a sociometric notebook: An analysis of nomination and rating scale measures of acceptance, rejection, and social preference. In A.H.N.Cillessen & W.M.Bukowski (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 1126). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Buss, A.H. & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Copeland, L. (2004, December 28). Click clique: Facebook’s online college community. Washington Post. Retrieved September 2, 2005, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/articles/A30002-2004Dec27.html
  • Corman, S.R., Kuhn, T., McPhee, R.D., & Dooley, K.J. (2002). Studying complex discursive systems: Centering resonance analysis of communication. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 157206.
  • Danowski, J.A. (1982). A network-based content analysis methodology for computer-mediated communication: An illustration with a computer bulletin board. In M.Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 5 (pp. 904925). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Danowski, J.A. (1993). Network analysis of message content. In G.Barnett & W.Richards (eds.). Progress in communication sciences XII (pp. 197222). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Danowski, J.A. (2003). Nodetric: Node-centric network analysis. [Computer program]. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
  • Danowski, J.A. (2008). WordLink, version Infinity. [Computer program]. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
  • Donath, J. & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 7182.
  • Donnellan, M.B., Trzesniewski, K.H., Robins, R.W., Moffitt, T.E., & Caspi, A. (2005) Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16(4), 328335
    Direct Link:
  • Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 1. Retrieved December 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
  • Ewen, R.B. (1998). Personality: A topical approach. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Eysenck, H.J. (1959). The Maudsley personality inventory. University of London Press.
  • Freiert, M. (2007). Facebook now ranked 3rd in page views; Myspace down nearly 20%. Complete, Inc. Retrieved December 22, 2007, from http://blog.compete.com/2007/09/11/Facebook-third-biggest-site-page-views-Myspace-down/
  • Geek & Poke (2007). That was 2007- Part I: The Social Graph, Geek & Poke Cartoons. Retrieved December 22, 2007, from http://geekandpoke.typepad.com/geekandpoke/2007/12/that-was-2007-.html
  • Golder, S.A., Wilkinson, D., & Huberman, B.A. (2007, June). Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network. In C.Steinfield, B.Pentland, M.Ackerman, & N.Contractor (Eds.), Proceedings of Third International Conference on Communities and Technologies (pp. 4166). London: Springer.
  • Gordon, C.W. (1957). The social system of the high school: A study in the sociology of adolescence. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
  • Hancock, J.T., & Dunham, P.J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28(3), 325347.
  • Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 14. Retrieved December 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html
  • Haythornthwaite, C. & Gruzd, A.A. (2007). A noun phrase analysis tool for mining online community. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Michigan State University. East Lansing. Available at: http://www.iisi.de/fileadmin/IISI/upload/C_T/2007/Haythornthwaite.pdf.
  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Hogg, M.A. & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M.A.Hogg and D.Abram (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Joinson, A.N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. The Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5(1). Retrieved December 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/
  • Jones, E.E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, N.J: General Learning Press.
  • Jones, S. (1994). CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. London: Sage Publications.
  • Jones, S. (1997). Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Jones, S. (1998). CyberSociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Kernis, M.H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 126.
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 4974.
  • KWIC (2006). [Computer program]. Japan: Nihon University College of Humanities and Sciences. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.chs.nihon-u.ac.jp/eng_dpt/tukamoto/kwic_e.html
  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of CSCW-2006 (pp. 167170). New York: ACM Press.
  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2007). A familiar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 435444). New York: ACM Press.
  • Lenhart, A. & Madden, M. (2007, April 18). Teens, privacy, & online social networks. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Privacy_SNS_Report_Final.pdf
  • Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005, July 27). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved January 4, 2006, from http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005web.pdf
  • Leung, L. (2001). College student motives for chatting on ICQ. New Media & Society, 3(4), 483500.
  • Marwick, A. (2005, October). “I’m a lot more interesting than a Friendster profile:” Identity presentation, authenticity, and power in social networking services. Paper presented at Internet Research 6.0, Chicago, IL.
  • Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E., & Simonds, C.J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook:” The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 117.
  • McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., & Gleason, M.E.J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 931.
  • Merton, D.E. (1997). The Meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175181.
  • Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 5663.
  • Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (2000). The big five personality factors as a model for the structure of children’s peer nominations. European Journal of Personality, 14(2), 91106.
  • Mruk, C.J. (1999). Self-esteem: Research, theory, and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125144.
  • Pelofsky, J. (2007, April 17). Facebook becomes bulletin board for Virginia Tech. Reuters. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N17428959.htm
  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 435468.
  • Robins, R.W., Tracy, J.L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S.D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463482.
  • Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent’s self-image. Rev. ed. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. The Rosenberg self-esteem scale (n.d.). Retrieved December 15, 2005, from the Department of Sociology at University of Maryland, College Park Website: http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/grad/socpsy_rosenberg.html
  • Rosmarin, R. (2007, May 25). Facebook Opens Up. Forbes.com. Retrieved on February 19, 2007, from http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/05/25/facebook-myspace-socialnetwork-tech-cx_rr_0525facebook.html
  • Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  • Schlenker, B.R., Weigold, M.F., & Hallam, J.R. (1990). Self-serving attributions in social context: Effects of self-esteem and social pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 855863.
  • Skog, D. (2005). Social interaction in virtual communities: The significance of technology. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 1(4), 464474.
  • Swinth, K.R., Farnham, S.D., & Davis, J.P. (n.d.). Sharing personal information in online community member profiles. Retrieved June 19, 2005, from http://research.microsoft.com/vwg/papers/sharing%20personal%20information%20in%20online%20community%20member%20profiles%20-%20with%20names.pdf
  • Tice, D.M. (1993). The social motivations of people with low self-esteem. In R.F.Baumeister (Ed.), Self-Esteem: The Puzzle of Low Self-Regard (pp. 3754). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Trier, M. (n.d.). We’re all connected: Addictive college Internet directory links students with friends, dates across U.S. The State News. Retrieved September 4, 2005, from http://www.statenews.com/article.phtml?pk=27624.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Turkle, S. (2007). Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 501517.
  • Valente, T.W., Gallaher, P., & Mouttapa, M. (2004). Using social networks to understand and present substance use: A transdisciplinary perspective. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(10-12) 16851712.
  • Valkenburg, P.M., Schouten, A.P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. New Media & Society, 7(3), 383402.
  • Valkenburg, P.M. & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 2. Retrieved December 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/valkenburg.html
  • Vargas, J.A. (2007, April 17). Students make connections at a time of total disconnect. Washington Post. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/16/AR2007041601834.html?hpid=topnews
  • Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • White, J. (2005). The relationship between profiles and perceived popularity online. Paper written for COMM 501. University of Illinois at Chicago.
  • Wolfe, R.N., Lennox, R.D., & Cutler, B.L. (1986). Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 356361.
  • Zakin, D.F. (1983). Physical attractiveness, sociability, athletic ability, and children’s preference for their peers. Journal of Psychology, 115, 117122.