SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior: Mapping social psychology series. Chicago: Dorsey.
  • Belsky, J. & Most, R. K. (1981). From exploration to play: A cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 630639.
  • Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B. & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 2332.
  • Bischof, N. (1998). Struktur und Bedeutung: Eine einführung in die systemtheorie für psychologen (2. corrected edition). Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Hans Huber.
  • Bouwman, H. & Van De Wijngaert, L. (2002). Content and context: An exploration of the basic characteristics of information needs. New Media & Society, 4(3), 329353.
  • Bretz, R. (1983). Media for interactive communication. Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi: Sage.
  • Bucy, E. P. (2004). Interactivity in society: Locating an elusive concept. Information Society, 20, 373383.
  • Chen, Q. & Wells, W. D. (1999). Attitude towards the site. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5), 2737.
  • Cho, C.-H. & Leckenby, J. D. (1999). Interactivity as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness. Center for Interactive Advertising. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://www.ciadvertising.org/studies/reports/info_process/99AAACHO.html
  • Coyle, J. R. & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 6577.
  • Downes, E. J. & McMillan, S. J. (2000). Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society, 2(2), 157179. Retrieved January 12, 2006 from http://web.utk.edu/~sjmcmill/Research/ms982012.doc
  • Durlak, J. T. (1987). A typology for interactive media. In M. L.McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 743757). Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 153181.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goertz, L. (1995). Wie interaktiv sind medien? Auf dem weg zu einer definition von interaktivität. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 477493.
  • Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of new interactive technologies for conceptualizing communication. In J. L.Salvaggio & J.Bryant (Eds.), Media use in the Information Age: Emerging patterns of adoption and consumer use (pp. 217235). Hillsdale, Hove, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), 2743. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://www.jiad.org/vol1/no1/heeter/index.htm
  • Jee, J. & Lee, W.-N. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of perceived interactivity: An exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(1), 2743. Retrieved January 28, 2006 from http://www.jiad.org/vol3/no1/jee/index.htm
  • Jensen, J. F. (1998). ’Interactivity‘. Tracking a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 185204.
  • Jensen, K. B. (2005). Interactivity in the wild. An empirical study of ‘interactivity’ as understood in organizational practices. Nordicom Review, 26(1), 330.
  • Jung, C. G. (2000). Archetyp und Unbewußtes. Augsburg: Bechtermünz.
  • Katz, E, Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G.Blumler & E.Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications. Current perspectives on gratification research (pp. 1932). Beverly Hills, London: Sage.
  • Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355383.
  • Koolstra, C. M. & Bos, M. J. W. (2005). Running head: A new instrument for interactivity. Paper presented at the First European Communication Conference, Amsterdam, November 24–27, 2005.
  • Krotz, F. (1995). Elektronisch mediatisierte kommunikation. Überlegungen zur konzeption einiger zukünftiger forschungsfelder der kommunikationswissenschaft. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 445462.
  • LaRose, R. & Eastin, M. S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358377.
  • Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 2750.
  • Lee, S.-J., Lee, W.-N., Kim, H. & Stout, P. A. (2004). A comparison of objective characteristics and user perception of web sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 4(2). Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://jiad.org/vol4/no2/lee
  • Leontiev, D. A. (2005). Three facets of meaning. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 43(6), 4572.
  • Liu, Y. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 207216.
  • Liu, Y. & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 5364.
  • Massey, B. L. & Levy, M. R. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism, and English-language web newspapers in Asia. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 138151.
  • McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity is in the eye of the beholder: Function, perception, involvement, and attitude toward the web site. In M. A. Shaver (Ed.), (pp. 7178). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Retrieved January 12, 2006 from http://web.utk.edu/~sjmcmill/Research/mcmillsj.doc
  • McMillan, S. J. (2002a). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. In L.Lievrouw & S.Livingston (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 162182). London: Sage.
  • McMillan, S. J. (2002b). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyber-places are more interactive than others. New Media and Society, 4(2), 271291. Retrieved February 12, 2006 from http://web.utk.edu/~sjmcmill/Research/nmsmodel3.doc
  • McMillan, S. J. & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 4154. Retrieved January 12, 2006 from http://web.utk.edu/~sjmcmill/Research/JA%20article.pdf
  • Morrison, M. A. (1998). A look at interactivity from a consumer perspective. In J. B.Ford & E. J. D.Honecutt (Eds.), Developments in marketing science, 21 (pp. 149154). Norfolk, VA: Academy of Marketing Science.
  • Newhagen J. E., Cordes, J. W. & Levy, M. R. (1995). Nightly@nbc.com: Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 164175. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://jnews.umd.edu/johnen/research/nbc.htm
  • Oehmichen, E. & Schröter, C. (2004). Die OnlineNutzerTypologie (ONT). Media Perspektiven 2004, 8, 386393.
  • Papacharissi, Z. & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175196.
  • Perinat, A. & Sadurni, M. (1999). The ontogenesis of meaning: An interactional approach. Mind, Culture & Activity, 6(1), 5376.
  • Perse, E. M. & Courtright, J. A. (1993). Normative images of communication media: Mass and interpersonal channels in the new media environment. Human Communication Research, 19(2), 485503.
  • Quiring, O. & Schweiger, W. (2006). Interaktivität – ten years after. Bestandsaufnahme und Analyserahmen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 54(1), 524.
  • Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P.Hawkins, J. M.Wiemann & S.Pingree (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes (pp. 110134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Rafaeli, S. & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
  • Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology. The new media in society. New York: Free Press.
  • Rodgers, S. & Thorson E. (2000). The interactive advertising model: How users perceive and process online ads. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1). Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/rodgers
  • Schönhagen, P. (2004). Soziale kommunikation im internet: Zur theorie und systematik computervermittelter kommunikation vor dem hintergrund der kommunikationsgeschichte. Bern et al.: Peter Lang.
  • Schuemie, M. J. & Van Der Mast, C. A. P. G. (1999). Presence: Interacting in VR? In A.Nijholt, O.Donk & B.Van Dijk (Eds.), Proceedings Twente Workshop on Language Technology 15 (pp. 213217). Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://graphics.tudelft.nl/~vrphobia/interactions.pdf
  • Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
  • Sicilia, M., Ruiz, S. & Munuera, J. L. (2005). Effects of interactivity in a web site: The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 3145.
  • Sohn, D. & Lee, B.-K. (2005). Dimensions of interactivity: Differential effects of social and psychological factors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/sohn.html
  • Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 7393. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://www.presence-research.org/papers/steuer92defining.pdf
  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society, 20, 391394.
  • Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing interactivity’s effects. The Information Society, 20(5), 385389.
  • Vorderer, P. (2000). Interactive media and beyond. In D.Zillmann & P.Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 2136). Mahwah, NJ, London: Erlbaum.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • Wu, G. (1999). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward website. Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference of American Academy of Advertising. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://www.ciadvertising.org/studies/reports/info_process/perceived_interactivity.pdf
  • Wu, G. (2005). The mediating role of perceived interactivity in the effect of actual interactivity on attitude toward the website. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 4560. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://jiad.org/vol5/no2/wu