SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 1114911152.
  • Arguello, J., Butler, B., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K. S., Rosé, C., & Xiaoping, W. (2006). Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Paper presented at CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Baker, E. C. (2002). Media, markets and democracy. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
  • Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek. T. (2000). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311(3–4), 590614.
  • Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek. T. (2003). Emergence of scaling in complex networks. In S. Bornholdt, & H. G. Schuster (Eds.), Handbook of Graph Networks (pp. 6984). Germany: Wiley-VCH.
  • Bagdikian, B. (2004). The new media monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., Tomkins, A. & Wiener, J. (2000). Graph structure in the web. Computer Networks, 33, 309320.
  • Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information System Research, 12(4), 346362.
  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (2001). Speech, media and ethics: The limits of free expression. New York: Palgrave.
  • Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7(1). Retrieved June 8, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlberg.html.
  • Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F .F., & Samukhin, A. N. (2000). Structure of growing networks with preferential linking. Physical Review Letters, 85, 46334636.
  • Eveland, W. P. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177193.
  • Fiore, A., LeeTeirnan, S. and Smith, M. (2002). Observed Behavior and Perceived Value of Authors in Usenet Newsgroups: Bridging the Gap. Paper presented at CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Fisher, D. (2005). Understanding communication using social networks. IEEE Internet Computing, September/October, 2005.
  • Fisher, D., Smith, M., & Welser, H. T. (2006). You are who you talk to: Detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), 59b.
  • Goldstein M. A., Morris, S. A., & Yen, G. G. (2004). Problems with fitting to the power-law distributio. The European Physical Journal B, 41, 255258.
  • Green, H. and Himelstein, L. (1998, October 19). Acyber revolt in health care. BusinessWeek, p. 154.
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Hafner, K. (1996, May 27). The doctor is on. Newsweek, 7778.
  • Hangwoo L. (2002). No artificial death, only natural death: The dynamics of centralization and decentralization of Usenet newsgroups. The Information Society, 18, 361370.
  • Himelboim, I., Fisher, D., Gleave E., and Smith, M. A. (2007). Reply magnets and preferential attachment in online political discussions: A network analysis of six month of discussions in 20 Usenet political newsgroups. Paper presented at the Association of Educators for Journalism and Mass Communication, August, 2007, Washington D.C.
  • Himelboim, I., Wirtz, J., & Jones, J. (2007). Online health discussions: Content in context. Paper presented at the International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, St. Pete Beach, FL, January 22–28.
  • Hohenberg, J. (1978). The professional journalist. New York: Holt Rinehart Winston.
  • Holbert, R. L., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., & Wen, W. (2003). The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry. Communication Monographs, 69(4), 296310.
  • Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), article 3. Retrieved January 8, 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/joyce.html.
  • Jones, Q., Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. (2002). An empirical examination of mass interaction system dynamics: Individual information overload and Usenet discourse. Paper presented at the 35th Hawaii International conference on System Sciences.
  • Jones, J. H., & Handcock, M. S. (2003). An assessment of preferential attachment as a mechanism for human sexual network formation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 11231128.
  • Kayany, J. M. (1998). Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: Flaming in social newsgroups on Usenet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 11351141.
  • Kelly, W., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. (2006). Friends, foes, and fringe: Norms and structure in political discussion networks, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 151, 412417.
  • Kennamer, J. D. (1990). Political discussion and cognition: A 1988 look. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 348352.
  • Kroker, A., & Weinstein, M. A. (1994). Data Trash: The theory of the virtual class. New York: St. Martin’s.
  • Lamberg, L. (1997). Online support group helps patients live with, learn more about the rare skin cancer CTCL-MF. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 14221423.
  • Loader, B. D., Muncer, S., Burrows, R., Pleace N., & Nettleton, S. (2002). Medicine on the line? Computer mediated social support and advice for people with diabetes. International Journal of Social Welfare, 11, 5365.
  • Lueg, C. (1998). Supporting Situated Actions in High Volume Conventional Data Situation. Paper presented at the CHI 1998 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Meiklejohn, A. (1965). Political freedom: The constitutional powers of the people. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mill, J. S. (1970). Essay on liberty. New York: Collier. [Originally printed in 1859]
  • Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64, 025102.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167256.
  • Nguyen-Fredrick, C. A. (1999). Feminist rhetoric in cyberspace: The ethos of feminist Usenet newsgroups. Information Society, 15(3), 187197.
  • Nye, J. S. (2002). The information revolution and American soft power. Asia Pacific Review, 9(1), 6076.
  • Online Health Search (2006). Pew Internet and American Lifestyle Project. Retrieved, May 2, 2007 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf.
  • Oliver, P. E., & Marwell, G. (1988). The paradox of groups size in gollective actions: A theory of the critical mass. II. American Sociological Review, 53(1), 18.
  • Picard, R. D. (1985). The press and the decline of democracy: The democratic socialist response in public policy. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  • Raban, D. R. (2007) “The power of assuming linearity.” (Working paper).
  • Reka, A., Jeong, H. C., & Barabási, A. L. (1999). Diameter of the world-wide web. Nature, 401, 130131.
  • Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1996). News media use and the informed public: A 1990s update. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 129135.
  • Schauer, F. (1982). Free speech, a philosophical enquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Deliberation or dispute? An exploratory study examining dimensions of public opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 2558.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 727743.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29, 4665.
  • Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42(3/4), 425440.
  • Simon, H. A. (1998). Information 101: It’s not what you know, it’s how you know it. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 21(4), 3033.
  • Smith, M. A. (1999). Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Mapping the social structure of the Usenet. In S.Marc & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, M. A. (2005). Netscan: A Social Accounting Search Engine (http://netscan.research.microsoft.com).
  • Southwell, B. G. (2005). Between messages and people: A multilevel model of memory for television content. Communication Research, 32(1), 112140.
  • Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Turner, T. C., & Fisher, K. E. (2006). The impact of social types within information communities: Findings from technical newsgroups, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06) Track 6 p. 135b.
  • Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T. and Schramm, W. (1963). For Theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility and Soviet communist concept: What the press should be and do. Freeport, NY: Books of Libraries Press.
  • Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Welser, H. T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. A. (2007). Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure, 8. Retrieved January 8, 2007 from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/Welser/.
  • Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748762.
  • Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W., & Cherny, L. (1998). The dynamics of mass interaction. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 257264.