SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barnes, S., & Greller, L. M. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in the organization. Communication Education, 43, 129142.
  • Baym, N. K. (1999). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153170.
  • Chesebro, J. W. (1985). Computer-mediated interpersonal communication. In B. D.Ruben (Ed.), Information and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 202222). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Contractor, N. S., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In J.Fulk & C. W.Steinfield (Eds.) Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 145174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121147.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M.Staw & L. L.Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural determinants. Management Science, 32, 554571.
  • D’Urso, S. C., & Rains, S. A. (2008). Examining the scope of channel expansion: A test of channel expansion theory with new and traditional communication media. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 486507.
  • Fulk, J., Flanagin, A. J., Kalman, M. E., Monge, P. R., & Ryan, T. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6, 6087.
  • Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J.Fulk & C.Steinfield (Eds.), Organization and communication technology (pp. 117140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Gong, L. & Nass, C. (2007). When a talking-face computer agent is half-human and half-humanoid: Human identity and consistency preference. Human Communication Research, 33, 163193.
  • Hunter, J., & Allen, M. (1992). Adaptation to electronic mail. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 254274.
  • Jones, S. G. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. In S. G.Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 1035). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Katz, J. E. (2007). Mobile media and communication: Some important questions. Communication Monographs, 74, 389394.
  • Katz, J. E., Rice, R. E., & Aspden, P. (2001). The Internet, 1995-2000: Access, civic involvement, and social interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 405419.
  • Korzenny, F. (1978). A theory of electronic propinquity: Mediated communication in organizations. Communication Research, 5, 323.
  • Markus, M. L. (1987). Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Communication Research, 14, 491511.
  • Parks, M. R., Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 8097.
  • Ramirez, A. & Wang, Z. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violations theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 2039.
  • Reese, S. D. (1988). New communication technologies and the information worker: The influence of occupation. Journal of Communication, 38, 5970.
  • Rice, R. E. (1980). The impacts of computer-mediated organizational and interpersonal communication. In M.Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology, 15 (pp. 221249). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.
  • Rice, R. E. & Associates. (1984). The new media: Communication, research and technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451484.
  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: John Wiley.
  • Spears, R, & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M.Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 3065). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 14921512.
  • Steinfield, C. (1992). Computer-mediated communications in organizational settings: Emerging conceptual frameworks and directions for research. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 348365.
  • Stephens, K. K. (2007). The successive use of information and communication technologies at work. Communication Theory, 17, 486507.
  • Timmerman, C. E. (2002). The moderating effect of mindlessness/mindfulness upon media richness and social influence explanations of organizational media use. Communication Monographs, 69, 111131.
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 5290.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 143.
  • Walther, J. B., Loh, T., Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 3665.