SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baker, C.E. (1989). Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Barabaoi, A.L. & Albert, R. (1999). Emerging of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509512.
  • BBC (2007). Yahoo ’censored’ Flickr comments, May 18 2007. [online] Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6665723.stm (June 4, 2008).
  • Brin, S. & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web-search engine. Computer Networks, 30, 107117.
  • Brosius, H. B. & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as two-step flow. Communication Research, 23, 561580.
  • Bucy, EP, & Gregson KS (2001). Media participation: A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media & Society, 3(3), 357380.
  • Burkhalter, B. & Smith, M. (2004). Inhabitant's uses and reactions to Usenet social accounting data. In D. N.Snowden, E. F.Churchill & E.Frecon (Eds.), Inhabited information spaces (pp. 291305). London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Bagdikian, B. (2004). The new media monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Corrado, A. & Firestone, C. M. (eds.) (1996). Elections in cyberspace: Toward a new era in American politics. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
  • Donath, J. S. (1996). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In P.Kollock & M.Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 2959). London: Routledge.
  • Fisher, D., Smith, M., & Welser, H.T. (2006). You are who you talk to: Detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), p. 59b.
  • Gitlin, T. (1978). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, 6, 205252.
  • Golder, S.A. & Donath, J. (2004). Social roles in electronic communities. Paper presented at Association of Internet Researchers IR 5.0, September 19-22, 2004, Brighton, England.
  • Hauben, M. & Hauben, R. (1997). Netcitizen. London: Wiley.
  • Haythornthwaite, C. & Hagar, C. (2005). The social world of the Web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 311346.
  • Herring, S. C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media & Society, 6(1), 2636.
  • Kahn, R. & Kellner, D. (2004). New media and internet activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging’. New Media & Society, 6, 8795.
  • Katz, E. (1987). Communications research since Lazarsfeld. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, s25s45.
  • Katz, E. & P. Lazarsfeld (1955). Personal influence. New York: The Free Press.
  • Levine, P. (2000). The Internet and civil society. Philosophy and Public Policy, 20(4), 18.
  • Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • McMillan, R. (2008). Bill Gates: Internet censorship won't work. IDG News Service/San Francisco Bureau. Retrieved July 12, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_002570DE00740E18882573F50010C487.html.
  • Mehra, B., Merkel, C., & Peterson Bishop, A. (2004). The Internet for empowerment of minority and marginal users. New media and society, 6(6), 781802.
  • Newman, M.E.J. (2001). Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64(2 Pt 2), 025102.
  • Newman, M.E.J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167256.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: the internet as a public sphere. New Media and Society, 4(1), 927.
  • Picard, R.D. (1985). The press and the decline of democracy: The democratic socialist response in public policy. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Siebert, F.S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1963). Four theories of the press. Freeport, NY: Books of Libraries Press.
  • Southwell, B. G. & Yzer, M. C. (2007). The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Communication Yearbook, 31, 420462.
  • Turner, T. C., Smith M., Fisher, D., & Welser H. T. (2005). Picturing Usenet: Mapping computer-mediated collective action. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(4), Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/turner.html.
  • Turner, T.C. and Fisher, K.E. (2006). The impact of social types within information communities: Findings from technical newsgroups. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6, 135b.
  • Van Den Ban, A. W. (1964). A revision of the two step flow of communication hypothesis. Gazette, 10, 237249.
  • Viegas, F.B. & Smith, M.A. (2004). Newsgroup crowds and author lines: Visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces. Big Island, HI: IEEE.
  • Weimann, G. (1994). The influentials: People who influence people. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Welser, H.T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M.A. (2007). Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure, 8. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/Welser/.
  • Wikipedia (2007). Usenet. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet.