SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34(5), 575618.
  • Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243268.
  • Boon, S. D., & Holmes, J. G. (1991). The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In R. A.Hinde & J.Groebel (Eds.), Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior (pp. 190211). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Box, G.E.P., & Jenkins, G. (1976). Time series analysis: forecasting and Control, San Francisco: Holden-Day.
  • Brown, H. G., Poole, M. S., & Rodgers, T. (2004). Interpersonal traits, complementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4), 115137.
  • Chidambaram, L. (1996). A study of relational development in computer supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 143165.
  • Cooper, D. R., & Emory, C. W. (1995). Business research methods. (5th ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
  • Costigan, R. D., Ilter, S. S., & Berman. J. J. (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3), 303317.
  • Davidow, W. H., & Malone, M. S. (1992). The virtual corporation. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Duphorne, P. L., & Gunawardena, C. N. (2005). The effect of three computer conferencing designs on critical thinking skills of nursing students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), pp. 3750.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450467.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1997). The life completed, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 941.
  • Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 6597.
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Jennings, B., Ortegano-Layne, L., Frechette, C., Carabajal, K., Lindemann, K., et al. (2004). Building an online wisdom community: A transformational design model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 4062.
  • Harrison, R. T., Dibben, M. R., & Mason, C. M. (1997). The role of trust in the informal investor's investment decision: An exploratory analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer, 6380.
  • Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity, New York: New York University Press.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/jarvenpaa.html.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Ives, B. (1994). The global network organization of the future: Information management opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 2557.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 2964.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250267.
  • Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S.Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 109128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, London: Sage Publications.
  • Larsen, K.R.T., & McInerney, C. R. (2002). Preparing to work in virtual organization. Information & Management, 39, 445456.
  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M.Kramer and T. R.Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438458.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, SAGE Publications, London. 6385.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709734.
  • Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M.Kramer and T. R.Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Group interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues and an agenda, London: Sage Publications.
  • McKing, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334359.
  • McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationship. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473490.
  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46, 413.
  • Paul, D. L., & McDaniel, Jr. R. R. (2004). A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 183227.
  • Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365396.
  • Poole, M. S. (1983). Decision development in small groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision development. Communication Monographs, 50(4), 321341.
  • Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing in Communication Science, 16, 110134.
  • Roark, A. E., & Hussen, H. S. (1989). Factors related to group cohesiveness. Small Group Behavior, 20, 6269.
  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. G., Burt, R. S. & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-disciplinary view of trust. Academy Management Review, 23(3), 393404.
  • Shapiro, D., B. H. Sheppard, L. Cheraskin. (1992). Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8(4), 365377.
  • Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment. In A. L.Weber & J. H.Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on Close Relationships (pp. 110130), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Shaw, M. E. (1980). Group Dynamics, New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Sheppard, B., & Tuchinsky, M. (1996). Micro-OB and the network organization. In R. M.Kramer and T. R.Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 140165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Simonoff, J. S. (1996). Smoothing Methods in Statistics, New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Management Science, 21(4), 427459.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Kramer. R. M. (1996). Whither trust? In R. M.Kramer and T. R.Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organizational Science, 6, 186203.
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.