SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abdulla, R. A., Garrison, B., Salwen, M. B., Driscoll, P. D., & Casey, D. (2005). Online news credibility. In M. B.Salwen, B.Garrison, & P. D.Driscoll (Eds.), Online news and the public (pp. 147164). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Berthon, P.L., Pitt, L.F., & Watson, R.T. (1996). Marketing communication and the world wide web. Business Horizons, 39, 4354.
  • Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 2332.
  • Bordewijk, J., & Van Kaam, B. (1986).Towards a new classification of teleinformation services. Inter Media, 14(1), 1621.
  • Bucy, E. (2004a). Interactivity in society: Locating an elusive concept. The Information Society, Nov/Dec. 20(5), 37383.
  • Bucy, E. (2004b). The interactivity paradox: Closer to the news but confused. In E.Bucy & J.Newhagen (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 4772). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chan-Olmsted, S. & Park, J. (2000). From on-air to online world: examining the content and structures of broadcast TV stations' Web sites. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 32139.
  • Chang, J. F., Torkzadeha, G., & Dhillon, G. (2004). Re-examining the measurement models of success for Internet commerce. Information & Management, 41, 577584.
  • Chen, Q. & Wells, W. (1999). Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5), 2737.
  • Cho, C.-H., & Leckenby, J. D. (1999). Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness: Antecedents and consequences of interactivity in Web advertising. In M. S.Roberts (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 162179). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
  • Christians, C., Ferre, J. & Fackler, P. (1993). Good News: Social Ethics and the Press. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Chung, D. S. (2008).. Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 658679 Retrieved October 2008 from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119414160/HTMLSTART.
  • Cross, R. & Smith, J. (1996). Consumer-focused strategies and tactics. In E.Forrest & R.Mizerski (Eds.), Interactive Marketing: The Future Present (pp. 527). IL, NTC Business Books.
  • Csíkszentmihályi, Mihály (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Deuze, M. (2003). The Web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 20330.
  • Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515540.
  • Fortin, D. R. & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387396.
  • Friedland, L. A., & McLeod, J. M. (1999). Community integration and mass media: A reconsideration. In D.Demers & K.Viswanath (Eds.), Mass Media, Social Control, and Social Change: A Macrosocial Perspective (pp. 197226). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J.Bryant & D.Zillmann (Eds.), Perspective on media effects (pp. 1740). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ghose, S. & Dou, W. Y. (1998). Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presences sites. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(2), 2943.
  • Greer, J., & Mensing, D. (2006). Evolution of online newspapers: A longitudinal content analysis, 1997-2003. In X.Li (Ed.), Internet Newspapers: The Making of a Mainstream Medium (pp. 1332). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Ha, L., & James, L. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business websites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 45774.
  • Habermas, J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. The MIT Press.
  • Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of new interactive technologies for conceptualizing communication. In J. L.Salvaggio & J.Bryant (Eds.), Media Use in the Information Age (pp. 217235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Husselbee, L. P., & Adams, A. (1996). Seeking instructional value: Publication of disturbing images in small communities. Newspaper Research Journal, 17, 3952.
  • Jakobovits, E. B. (1997). New web sites provide tools for wading through the electronic information deluge. Scientist, 11, 12.
  • Johnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (2004). For whom the Web toils: How Internet experience predicts Web reliance and credibility. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 12(1), 1945.
  • Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 5471.
  • Kenney, K., Gorelik, A., & Mwangi, S. (2000). Interactive features of online newspapers. First Monday, 5(1), Retrieved July 2006 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_1/kenney/.
  • Kim, T. & Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), Retrieved February 2009 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/kim.html.
  • Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 35583.
  • Lacy, S. (1992). Ideas for prospering in a changing market. Newspaper Research Journal, 13(3), 8594.
  • Lauterer, J. (2006). Community journalism: Relentlessly local. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Lee, J. S. (2000). Interactivity: A new approach. paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Conference, Phoenix, AZ., August 9-12.
  • Lee, W. N. & Choi, S. M. (2005). The role of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism in online consumers' response toward persuasive communication on the Web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), Retrieved October 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/wnlee.html.
  • Li, X. (2006). Internet newspapers: The making of a mainstream medium. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Light, A. & Wakeman, I. (2001). Beyond the interface: Users' perceptions of interaction and audience on web sites. Interacting with Computers, 13, 325351.
  • Lowrey, W. (2003). What influences small newspapers to decide to publish online news? Newspaper Research Journal, 24(3), 8390.
  • Lombard, M. & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2), 140, Retrieved February 2009 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
  • Massey, B., & Levy, M. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism, and English-language.
  • Web newspapers in Asia. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 13851.
  • McMillan, S. J. (2002). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyber- places are more interactive than others. New Media & Society, 4(2), 27191.
  • Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Voss, G. B. & Grewal, D. (2003). Determinants of online channel use and overall satisfaction with a relational, multichannel service provider. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 448458.
  • Morgan, M. & & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. Communication Yearbook, 20, 145.
  • Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 3950.
  • Newhagen, J. E. & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the internet: a dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46, 413.
  • Newslink, Newspapers on the Internet (2004). retrieved May 2004 from http://www.newslink.org/news.html.
  • Nip, J. Y. M. (2006). Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 212236.
  • Noar, S. M., Clark, A., Cole, C., & Lustria, M. L. (2006). Review of interactive safer sex web sites: Practice and potential. Health Communication, 20(3), 23341.
  • Online News Association, (2003). Digital journalism credibility study. OnlineNews Association.org. Retrieved October 2003 from http://www.journalists.org.
  • Outing, S. (1998). What exactly is “interactivity?” E & P Interactive, (December 4). Retrieved January 1999 from http://www.mediainfo.com/ephome/news/newshtm/stop/st120498.htm.
  • Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2004). News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audience larger, more diverse. Retrieved January 2006 from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=215.
  • Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R.Hawkins, J.Wiemann, & S.Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Rafaeli, S., & Ariel, Y. (2007). Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated research. In A. N.Joinson, K.Y.AMcKenna., T.Postmes, & U-D.Reips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 7188). Oxford University Press.
  • Rafaeli, S. & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4), Retrieved Dec. 2004 from http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology: The new media in society. New York: The Free Press.
  • Rosenberry, J. (2005). Few papers use online techniques to improve public communication. Newspaper Research Journal, 26(4), 6173.
  • Schultz, T. (1999). Interactive options in online journalism: A content analysis of 100 U.S. newspapers. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5(1), Retrieved March 2009 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/schultz.html.
  • Schumacher, P. & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences, Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95110.
  • Shankar, V., Smith, A. K. & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(2), 153175.
  • Shannon, C. & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Steuer, J. (1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. In F.Biocca & M. R.Levy (Eds.), Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality (pp. 3356). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 11132.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society, Nov/Dec., 20(5), 39194.
  • Sundar, S. (2000). Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: a study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 48099.
  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. In E.Konijn, S.Utz, M.Tanis, & S.Barnes (Eds.), Mediated Interpersonal Communication (pp. 5874). New York: Routledge.
  • Sundar, S, Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating Web site interactivity: impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30(1), 3059.
  • Teo, H. H., Oh, L. B., Liu, C., & Wei, K. K. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3), 281305.
  • Tezon, A. L. (2003). Cheerleaders, watchdogs and community builders: How rural weekly newspaper publishers in the Midwest view their roles. Grassroots Editor, 44(4), 18.
  • Viegas, F. (2005). Bloggers' expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), Retrieved October 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/viegas.html.
  • Williams, F., Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research Methods and the New Media. The Free Press, New York.
  • Wu, G. (1999). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward Website. In M. S.Roberts (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 254262). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
  • Zhang, P. & Von Dran, G. (2000). Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: A two-factor model for website design and evaluation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 12531268.
  • Zviran, M., Glezer, C., and Avni, I. (2006). User satisfaction from commercial web sites: The effect of design and use, Information & Management, 43(2), 157178.