SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Baron, N. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 5988.
  • Beeman, W. (1981). Why do they laugh? An interactional approach to humor in traditional Iranian improvisatory theatre. Journal of American Folklore, 94, 506526.
  • Beeman, W. (2000). Humor. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9, 103106.
  • Brodnar, J. (2007). Kids and cell phones Kiplinger.com, June 27.
  • Brown, P. (1998). How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In J.Coates (Ed.), Language and Gender (pp. 8199). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. New York: Routledge.
  • Cameron, D. (2004). Out of the bottle: The social life of metalanguage. In A.Jaworski, N.Coupland, & D.Galasinski (Eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (pp. 311321). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Caron, A., & Caronia, L. (2007). Moving Cultures: Mobile Communications in Everyday Life. Ithaca: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger [1966]. New York: Routledge.
  • Douglas, N. (2008). What the hell are 4chan, ED, Something Awful, and “b”? Gawker, January 18. http://gawker.com/346385/what-the-hell-are-4chan-ed-something-awful-and-b.
  • Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 46190.
  • Elliott, S. ((2008). February 5). For marketing, the most valuable player might be YouTube. The New York Times, pp. C3.
  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gleason, J. B., Perlman, R. Y., & Greif, E. B. (1984). What's the magic word: Learning language through politeness routines. Discourse processes, 7, 493502.
  • Herring, S. (2008). Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity. In D.Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital Media (pp. 7192). Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
  • Hill, J. (2001). Mock Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres. In S.Gal & K.Woolard (Eds.), Languages and publics (pp. 83102). Manchester: St. James Books.
  • Holmes, J. (1998). Women talk too much. In L.Bauer & P.Trudgill (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 4149). New York: Penguin.
  • Jakobson, R. (1985). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics [1960]. In R.Innis (Ed.), Semiotics: An introductory anthology (pp. 147175). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.
  • Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
  • Jones, G., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2009). Enquoting voices, accomplishing talk: Uses of be + like in Instant Messaging. Language & Communication, 29, 77113.
  • Kearney, M. (2005). Birds on the wire: Troping teenage girlhood through telephony in mid-twentieth century US media culture. Cultural Studies, 19, 568601.
  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. In M.Knobel & C.Lankshear (Eds.), A New Literacies Sampler (pp. 199227). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2008). Remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 2233.
  • Lefkowitz, D. (2003). Investing in emotion: Love and anger in financial advertising. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12, 7197.
  • Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Lange, P. (2007a). Searching for the ‘You’ in ‘YouTube’: An analysis of online response ability. Proceedings of the Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference 2007 (pp. 3145), Berkeley, CA.: University of California Press. http://www.epic2007.com/Draft-EPIC2007-Proceedings.pdf.
  • Lange, P. ((2007b). March). Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Paper presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, FL.
  • Lange, P. (2008). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 361380.
  • Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A. & Macgill, A. (2008). Writing, technology and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf.
  • Ling, R. (2008). New tech, new ties. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
  • Lucy, J. (1993). Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In J.Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 932). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Milroy, J. (1998). Children can't speak or write properly anymore. In L.Bauer & P.Trudgill (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 5865). New York: Penguin.
  • Mindlin, A. (2008). Letting our fingers do the talking. New York Times, September 29.
  • O’Donnell, S., Gibson, K., Milliken, M., & Singer, J. (2008). Reacting to YouTube videos: Exploring differences among user groups. Proceedings of the International Communication Assoc Annual Conference (ICA 2008) Montreal, Quebec. May 22–26. http://iit-iti.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/iit-publications-iti/docs/NRC-50361.pdf.
  • Quinn, M. (2008). YouTube offers more insight on audiences. Chicago Tribune, June 16, p. 3.
  • Rodriguez, A. & Clair, R. (1999). Graffiti as communication: Exploring the discursive tensions of anonymous texts. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 115.
  • Rymes, B. (2008). Crank Dat, Soulja Boy: Where mass media meet grass roots. Paper presented at American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, November 23.
  • Schieffelin, B. B. & Doucet, R. (1998). The “Real” Haitian Creole: Ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. In B. B.Schieffelin, K.Woolard, & P.Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 285316). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schieffelin, B, B, & Jones, G. (2008). JKBNR (Just Kidding But Not Really): Texting into talk. Paper presented at American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, November 20.
  • Shade, L. (2007). Feminizing the mobile: Gender scripting of mobiles in North America. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21, 179189.
  • Sherzer, J. (2002). Speech play and verbal art. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Spitulnik, D. (1996). The social construction of media discourse and the mediation of communities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 6, 16187.
  • Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11, 667701.
  • Thurlow, C. (2007). Fabricating youth: New-media discourse and the technologization of young people. In S.Johnson & A.Ensslin (Eds.), Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies (pp. 213233). London: Continuum.
  • Thurlow, C., & Poff, M. (in press). The language of text messaging. In S.Herring, D.Stein, & T.Virtanen (Eds.), Handbook of the Pragmatics of CMC. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Trudgill, P. (1975). Sex and covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. In B.Thorne & N.Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 88104). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.