SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Black, R. W. (2008). Just don't call them cartoons: The new literacy spaces of anime, manga and fanfiction. In J.Coiro, M.Knobel, C.Lankshear, & D.Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 583610). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Boyd, D. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites,” First Monday, 11(12), (December), Retrieved October 15, 2008 at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/.
  • Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth inline image social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D.Buckingham (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning: Youth, identity and digtial media (pp. 119142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved October 9, 2008, from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/dmal/-/6?cookieSet=1.
  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.
  • Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.C., & Nice, R. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. New York: Sage.
  • Brown, J. S. (2008). How to connect technology and content in the service of learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(8), Retrieved January 24, 2009, from http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i08/08a12001.htm.
  • Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (2002). The Social Life of Information. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond technology: Children's learning in the age of digital culture. Malden, MA: Polity.
  • Chandler, D. ( 1998 September 9). Personal home pages and the construction of identities on the Web. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/webident.html.
  • Childnet International 2007). Young people and social networking services: A Childnet International research report. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.digizen.org/socialnetworking.
  • Clark, D. A. 1997). Twenty years of cognitive assessment: Current status and future directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 9961000.
  • Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. 2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J.Coiro, M.Knobel, C.Lankshear, & D.Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 121). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • College Access Marketing (n.d.) Achieving college access goals: The relevance of new media in reaching first-generation and low-income teens. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from http://www.collegeaccessmarketing.org/campaignresourcecenter_ektid232.aspx.
  • DeGennaro, D. 2008). Learning designs: An analysis of youth-initiated technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 120.
  • Donath, J., & Boyd, D. 2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 7182.
  • Douglas-Hall, A., Chau, M., & Koball, H. 2006). Basic facts about low-income children: Birth to age 18. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty.
  • Dwyer, C. 2007). Digital relationships in the ‘MySpace’ generation: Results from a qualitative study. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA, 1–10.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. 2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), article 1. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html.
  • Ellison N.B. 2008). Introduction: Reshaping campus communication and community through social network sites. In G.Salaway, J.Borreson, & M.R.Nelson (Vol. Ed.), The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008: Vol 8. (pp. 1932). Educause Center for Applied Research. Boulder, CO: Educause.
  • Engestrom, Y. 1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
  • Erstad, O., Oystein, G. & De Lange, T. 2007). Re-mixing multimodal resources: Multiliteracies and digital production in Norwegian media education. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 183198.
  • Gee, J.P. 1999). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Granovetter, M. 1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 136080.
  • Greenhow, C. 2008). Commentary: Connecting formal and informal learning in the age of participatory media: A response to Bull et. al. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), Retrieved February 28, 2009, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol8/iss3/editorial/article1.cfm .
  • Greenhow, C. (2009 April). Connecting youths' social, civic, and educational lives through action-oriented Facebook publications. Presentation to the third annual HASTAC Conference “Traversing Digital Boundaries.” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, April 19–21, 2009.
  • Greenhow, C. & Robelia, E. 2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119140.
  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. 2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246259.
  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. 2009). Research on learning and teaching with Web 2.0: Bridging conversations. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 280283.
  • Greenhow, C. & Kim, S. 2009). Examining low-income students' access and use of online social network sites as social learning spaces. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Greenhow, C., Kim, S. & Robelia, B. (2008 March). Examining the intersections of online social networks, pedagogy, and engagement among low-income students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, New York, March 24–28.
  • Greenhow, C., Walker, J.D., & Kim, S. 2009). Millenial leaners and net-savvy teens?: Examining internet use among low-income students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. 2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proceedings of WPES'05 (pp. 7180). Alexandria, VA: ACM.
  • Hargittai, E. 2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 14. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html.
  • Hargittai, E. & G. Walejko. 2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication and Society .
  • Herring, S. C. 2007). Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult construction of online youth identity. In: D.Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 7194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved January 30, 2009, from http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/herring/macarthur.pdf.
  • Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006 November). Crossing boundaries: Identity management . student/faculty relationships on the Facebook . Paper presented at the the Computer-supported Cooperative Work Conference, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
  • Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M.E. (2008 March). Youth-designed social networking: Literacies, identities, and relationships at the intersection of online and offline experience. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  • Hull, G., & Nelson, M.E. 2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 22462.
  • Jenkins, H. 1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. London: Routledge.
  • Jenkins, H. 2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century. White paper for the MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved on July 1, 2008, from www.digitallearning.macfound.org.
  • Jones, S., Millermaier, S., Goya-Martinez, M., & Schuler, J. 2008). Whose space is MySpace? A content analysis of MySpace profiles. First Monday, 13(9). Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2202/2024.
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. 2002). internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 4974.
  • Kress, G. 2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.
  • Kuh, G.D. 2007). How to help students achieve. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(41), Retrieved January 24, 2009, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v53/i41/41b01201.htm.
  • Lange, P. G. 2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 18. Retrieved October 15, 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/lange.html.
  • Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. 2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. 2nd edn. Maidenhead & New York: Open University Press.
  • Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. 2007). The nation's report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007–496). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
  • Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & McGill, A.R. (2008 April). Writing, technology, and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf.
  • Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007 January 3). Pew Internet Project Data Memo. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_2007.pdf.
  • Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005 July). Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005web.pdf.
  • Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A.R. & Smith, A. (2007 December 19). Teens and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
  • Lessig, L. 2004). Free culture. New York: Penguin. Retrieved March 12, 2009, from http://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Lessig/Free_Culture/Free%20Culture.htm#p116#nav.
  • Leu, D. J., O'Byrne, I., Zawilinski, J., McVerry, G., & Everett-Cacopardo, H. (in press). Expanding the new literacies conversation. Educational Researcher .
  • Levin, D., Arafeh, S., Lenhart, A., & Rainie, L. (2002 August). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved October 1, 2008, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/67/report_display.asp.
  • Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E., & Thumin, N. 2008). Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies. In J.Coiro, M.Knobel, C.Lankshear, & D.Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 103132). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. 2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook:” The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 117.
  • National School Board Association (2007 July). Creating and connecting: Research and guidelines on social–and educational–networking. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from www.nsba.org/SecondaryMenu/TLN/CreatingandConnecting.aspx.
  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2008). 21st Century skills, education & competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from http://www.21stcentury skills.org/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and_competitiveness_guide.pdf.
  • Perkel, D. 2008). Copy and paste literacy? Literacy practices in the production of a Myspace profile. In K.Drotner, H. S.Jensen & K. C.Schroeder (Eds.), Informal learning and digital media: Constructions, contexts, consequences (pp. 203224). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
  • Prensky, M. 2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).
  • Rogers, M. C., Taylor, B., Cunning, D., Jones, M., & Taylor, K. 2006). Parental restrictions on adolescent internet use. Pediatrics, 118(4), Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/118/4/1804.
  • Salaway, G., Borreson, J., Nelson, M.R., 2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008: Vol 8. (Educause Center for Applied Research). Boulder, CO: Educause.
  • Sheehy, G. (2008 August). Campaign Hillary: Behind closed doors. Vanity Fair , 7986.
  • Steinkuehler, C. 2008). Cognition and literacy in massively multiplayer online games. In J.Coiro, M.Knobel, C.Lankshear, & D.Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 611134). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.
  • Thurlow, C. 2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people's text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1). Retrieved February 27, 2009, from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003-paper.html.
  • Thurlow, C. 2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), article 1.
  • Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. & Tomic, A. 2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction on the internet. London: Sage.
  • Tinto, V. 1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167177.
  • Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. 2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships, In M, L, Knapp, J, A, Daly & G, R, Miller (Eds), The handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Warschauer, M. 2007). A teacher's place in the digital divide. In L.Smolin, K.Lawless, & N. C.Burbules (Eds.), Information and communication technologies: Considerations of current practices for teachers and teacher educators: 106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2 (pp. 157166). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Warschauer, M. & Ware, P. 2008). Learning, change, and power: Competing frames of technology and literacy. In J.Coiro, M.Knobel, C.Lankshear, & D.Leu (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 215240). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001 November). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 43756.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Zhao, C. and Kuh, G. D. 2004). Added value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115138.