SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9 6282.
  • Atre, J., & Katz, E. (2005, May). What's killing television news? Experimentally assessing the effects of multiple channels on media choice. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, New York, NY.
  • Authors. (2008a).
  • Authors (2008b).
  • Banning, S., & Trammell, K.D. (2006, August). Revisiting the issue of blog credibility: A national survey. Paper presented at the annual conference at the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, San Francisco, CA.
  • Bartlett, D. L., Drew, P. B., Fahle, E. G., & Watts, W. A. (1974). Selective exposure to a presidential campaign appeal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38 264270.
  • Best, S. J., Chmielewski, B., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Selective exposure to online foreign news during the conflict with Iraq. Harvard Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 4), 5270.
  • Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brannon, L.A., Tagler, M.J., & Eagly, A.H. (2007). The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 611617.
  • Brundidge, J. (2006, June). The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks: Does the medium matter? Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Dresden, Germany.
  • Brundidge, J. (2007, May). Modeling the impact of the Internet on exposure to disagreement. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, SanFrancisco, CA.
  • Brundidge, J. (2008, May). The contemporary media environment and breadth of communication: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.
  • Bruns, A. (2006). The practice of news blogging. In A.Bruns and JoanneJacobs (Eds.), Uses of blogs (pp. 1122). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Chaffee, S. H., Saphir, M. N., Grap, J., Sandvig, C., & Hahn, K. S. (2001). Attention to counter-attitudinal messages in a state election campaign. Political Communication, 18 247272.
  • Choi, J. H., Watt, J. H., Lynch, M. (2006). Perceptions of news credibility about the war in Iraq: Why war opponents perceived the Internet as the most credible medium. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12 article 11. Retrieved April 13, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue1.choi.html.
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Donsbach, W. (1991). Exposure to political content in newspapers: The impact of cognitive dissonance on readers' selectivity. European Journal of Communication, 6 155186.
  • Dutta-Begrman, M.J. (2006). Community participation and Internet use after September 11: Complementarity in channel consumption. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 2), article 4, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/dutta-bergman.html.
  • Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1), 524.
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35 469492.
  • Galston, W. A. (2003). If political fragmentation is the problem, is the Internet the solution? In D. M.Anderson & M.Cornfield (Eds.), The civic web: Online politics and democratic values (pp. 3544). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Garrett, R.K. (2006). Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication and Society, 9 202224.
  • Graf, J., & Aday, S. (2008). Selective attention to online political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52 86100.
  • Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts & minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Hardy, B. W., Scheufele, D. A., & Wang, Z. (2005, May). Defining deliberation: Key determinants and distinct dimensions. Paper presented to the annual convention of the International Communication Association. New York, NY.
  • Hollander, B.A. (1996). Talk radio: Predictors of use and effects on attitudes about government. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73 10213.
  • Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25, 1), 6595.
  • Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological Selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59 1939.
  • Johnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (2004). Wag the Blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence perceptions of credibility of weblogs among blog users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 3), 622642.
  • Johnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (2006). Blog day afternoon: Are blogs stealing audiences away from traditional media sources? in RalphBerenger (Ed.), Cybermedia go to war (pp. 316333). Spokane, WA: Marquette Books.
  • Johnson, T.J., & Kaye, B.K. (2008, August). Can you teach a new blog old tricks? How blog users judge credibility of different types of blogs for information about the Iraq War. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication annual convention, Chicago, IL.
  • Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B.K., Bichard, S. L., & Wong, W. J. (2007). Every blog has its day: Politically interested Internet users' perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 article 6. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/johnson.html.
  • Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2005). Giving advice or making decisions in someone else's place: The influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 7), 977990.
  • Kaye, B. K. (2007). Blog use motivations: An exploratory study. In M.Tremayne (ed.). Blogging, citizenship, and the future of media (pp. 127148). New York: Routledge.
  • Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2004). Weblogs as a source of information about the 2003 Iraq War. In R.D.Berenger (Ed.), Global media goes to war: Role of news and entertainment media during the 2003 Iraq War (pp. 291301). Spokane, WA: Marquette Books.
  • Kinder, D. R. (2003). Communication and politics in the age of information. In D. O.Sears, L.Huddy & R.Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 357393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Alter, S. (2007). The gender news use divide: Americans' sex-typed selective exposure to online news topics. Journal of Communication, 57 739758.
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2008, May). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counter-attitudinal political information. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.
  • Lawson-Borders, G. & Kirk, R. (2005). Blogs in campaign communication. American Political Science Review, 80, 2), 505520.
  • Lau, R. R. (1989). Construct accessibility and electoral choice. Political Behavior, 11, 1), 532.
  • Lodge, M., & Hamill, R. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review, 80, 2), 505520.
  • Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56, 1), 2751.
  • Melican, D.B., & Dixon, T.L. (2008). News on the net: Credibility, selective exposure, and racial prejudice. Communication Research, 35 151168.
  • Mende, A-M. (2008, May). Testing the hostile media effect under selective exposure. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 1), 111126.
  • Mutz, D.C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95, 1), 97114.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6 259283.
  • Perlmutter, D. A. (2008). Blog wars. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pettigrew, T.F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 173185.
  • Prior, M. (2002). Liberated viewers, polarized voters–the implications of increased media choice for democratic politics. The Good Society, 11, 3), 1016.
  • Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming. In G.Barnett & F. J.Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 13, pp. 173212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
  • Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 3), 577592.
  • Rainie, L., & Horrigan, J. (2005). A decade of adoption: How the Internet has woven itself into American life. Accessed January 25, 2006 at http://www.pewinternet.org/reports.
  • Schuefele, D.A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I.S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56 728753.
  • Scheufele, D.A., Nisbit, M.C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E.C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impact of social setting, network homogeneity, and information variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21 315338.
  • Schudson, M. (1995). The power of news. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Smith, S.M., Fabrigar, L.R., & Norris, M.E. (2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2 464493.
  • Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31 194213.
  • Stroud, N.J. (2006). Selective exposure to partisan information. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Stroud, N.J. (2007a). Media effects, selective exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11. Political Communication, 24 415432.
  • Stroud, N.J. (2007b, May). Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30 341366.
  • Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 3), 755769.
  • Taylor, S. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In J. H.Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 189211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Trammell, K.D., Tarkowski, A., & Sapp, S. (2006). Rzeczpospolita blogow [Republic of Blog]: Examining Polish bloggers through content analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 article 2. Retrieved April 13, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3.trammell.html.
  • Tremayne, M., Zheng, N., Lee, J. K., & Jeong, J. (2006). Issue publics on the Web: Applying network theory to the war blogosphere. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12 article 15. Retrieved April 13, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue1/tremayne.html
  • Wall, M. (2006). Blogging Gulf War II. Journalism Studies, 7, 1), 111126.
  • Williams, A.P., Trammell, K.D., Postelnicu, M., Landreville, K.D., and Martin, J.D. (2005). Blogging and hyperlinking: Use of the Web to enhance viability during the 2004 US campaign. Journalism Studies, 6 177186.
  • Wojciewszak. M.E., & Mutz, D.C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59 4056.
  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ziemke, D. A. (1980). Selective exposure in a presidential campaign contingent on certainty and salience. In D.Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 4 497511. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.