SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adelman, M. B., Parks, M. R., & Albrecht, T. L. (1987). Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties. In T. L.Albrecht, M. B.Adelman, & Associates (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 126147). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Albrecht, T. L., Burleson, B. R., & Goldsmith, D. J. (1994). Supportive communication. In M.Knapp & G. R.Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 419449). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Albrecht, T. L., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2003). Social support, social networks, and health. In T. L.Thompson, A. M.Dorsey, K. I.Miller, & R.Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Aneshensel, C. S., & Stone, J. D. (1982). Stress and depression: A test of the buffering model of social support. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 13921396.
  • Ballieux, R. E., & Heijen, C. J. (1989). Stress and the immune response. In H.Weiner, I.Floring, R.Murison, & D.Hellhammer (Eds.), Frontiers of stress research (pp. 5155). Toronto, Canada: Huber.
  • Barbee, A. P., Derlega, V. J., Sherburne, S. P., & Grimshaw, A. (1998). Helpful and unhelpful forms of social support for HIV-positive individuals. In V. J.Derlega & A. P.Barbee (Eds.), HIV & social interaction (pp. 83105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Barrera, M. (1988). Models of social support and life stress. In L. H.Cohen (Ed.), Life events and psychological functioning: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 211236). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Berkman, L. F. (1985). The relationship of social networks and social support to morbidity and mortality. In S.Cohen & S. L.Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 241262). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Bloom, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (1984). The relationship of two dimensions of social support to the psychological well-being and social functioning of women with advanced breast cancer. Social Science Medicine, 19, 831837.
  • Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107136.
  • Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123151.
  • Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., & Goldsmith, D. A. (2004). Social support and the management of uncertainty for people living with HIV or AIDS. Health Communication, 16, 305331.
  • Burleson, B. B. & Goldsmith, D. J. (1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In P. A.Andersen & L. K.Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245280). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Campbell, K., & Wright, K. B. (2002). On-line support groups: An investigation of relationships among source credibility, dimensions of relational communication, and perceptions of emotional support. Communication Research Reports, 19, 183193.
  • Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151156.
    Direct Link:
  • Carstensen, L. L. (1998). A life-span approach to social motivation. In J.Heckhausen & C. S.Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 341364). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carstensen, L. L., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). Influence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others. Health Psychology, 17, 494503.
  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165181.
  • Chappell, N. L., & Novak, M. (1992). The role of support in alleviating stress among nursing assistants. Gerontologist, 32, 251359.
  • Chesler, M. A., & Barbarin, O. A. (1984). Difficulties of providing help in a crisis: Relationships between parents of children with cancer and their friends. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 113134.
  • Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300314.
  • Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269297.
  • Cohen, S., Karmack, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385396.
  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310357.
  • Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R.Sarason, I. G.Sarason, & G. R.Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319366). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse supportive behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154174.
  • Dakof, G. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1990). Victims' perceptions of social support: What is helpful from whom? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 8089.
  • Dean, A., & Lin, N. (1977). The stress buffering role of social support: Problems and prospects for systematic investigation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 321341.
  • Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Wortman, C. B. (1982). The interpersonal dynamics of cancer: Problems in social relationships and their impact on patients. In H. S.Friedman & M. R.DiMatteo (Eds.), Interpersonal issues in health care (pp. 69100). New York: Academic Press.
  • Eckenrode, S. (1983). The mobilization of social supports: Some individual constraints. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 509520.
  • Ellis, B. H., & Miller, K. I. (1994). Supportive communication among nurses: Effects on commitment, burnout, and retention. Health Communication, 6, 7796.
  • Finn, J. & Banach, M. (2000). Victimization online: The downside of seeking services for women on the Internet. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 276285.
  • Franks, H. M., Cronan, T. A., & Oliver, K. (2004). Social support in women with fibromyalgia: Is quality more important than quantity? Journal of Community Psychology, 4, 425438.
  • Goldsmith, D. J. (2004). Communicating social support. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldsmith, D. J., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26, 234263.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 13601380.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V.Marsden & N.Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105130). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201233.
  • Helgeson, V. S., Cohen, S., Schulz, R., & Yasko, J. (2000). Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: Who benefits from what? Health Psychology, 19, 107114.
  • Helgeson, V. S., & Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Support groups. In S.Cohen, L. G.Underwood, & B. H.Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 221245). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie L. (2002). Getting serious online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 155.
  • Kalliath, T., & Morris, R. (2002). Job satisfaction among nurses: A predictor of burnout levels. Journal of Nursing Administration, 32, 648654.
  • Kausar, R., & Akram, M. (1998). Cognitive appraisal and coping of patients with terminal illness versus non terminal illness. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 9, 1328.
  • Kohn, P. M. (1996). On coping adaptively with daily hassles. In M.Zeidner & N. S.Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 181201). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • LaGaipa, J. L. (1990). The negative effects of informal support systems. In S.Duck & R. C.Silver (Eds.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 122139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lang, F. R. (2000). Endings and continuity of social relationships: Maximizing intrinsic benefits within personal networks when feeling near to death. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 17, 155182.
  • Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology & Aging, 17, 125139.
  • Levy, J. A., & Strombeck, R. (2002). Health benefits and risks of the Internet. Journal of Medical Systems, 26, 495510.
  • Lockenhoff, C. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: The increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. Journal of Personality, 72, 13951423.
  • Mathieson, C. M., Logan-Smith, L. L., Phillips, J., MacPhee, M., & Attia, M. L. (1996). Caring for head and neck oncology patients: Does social support lead to better quality of life? Canadian Family Physician, 42, 17121720.
  • National Cancer Institute. (2007). Health Information National Trends Survey [Data file]. Available from the National Cancer Institute website, http://hints.cancer.gov/index.jsp
  • Neuhauser, L., & Kreps, G. L. (2003). Rethinking communication in the e-health era. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 723.
  • Pitula, C. R., & Daugherty, S. R. (1995). Sources of social support and conflict in hospitalized depressed women. Nursing and Health, 18, 325332.
  • Preece, J. J., & Ghozati, K. (2001). Experiencing empathy on-line. In R. E.Rice & J. E.Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 237260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Query, J. L., Jr., & Wright, K. B. (2003). Assessing communication competence in an on-line study: Towards informing subsequent interventions among older adults with cancer, their lay caregivers, and peers. Health Communication, 15, 205219.
  • Rook, K. S. (1995). Support, companionship, and control in older adults' social networks: Implications for well-being. In J. F.Nussbaum & J.Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (pp. 437463). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Shaw, B., McTavish, F., Hawkins, R.P., Gustafson, D., & Pingree, S. (2000). Experiences of women with breast cancer: Exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. Journal of Health Communication, 5, 135149
  • Sullivan, C. F., & Reardon, K. K. (1985). Social support satisfaction and health locus of control: Discriminators of breast cancer patients' style of coping. In M. L.McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 9, pp. 707722). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Thoits, P. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 145159.
  • Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within on-line communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51, 231251.
  • Tyler, P. A., & Cushway, D. (1995). Stress in nurses: The effects of coping and social support. Stress Medicine, 11, 243251.
  • Uchino, B. N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. W., & Bloor, L. (2004). Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 123139.
  • Waldron, V. R., Lavitt, M., & Kelley, D. (2000). The nature and prevention of harm in technology-mediated self-help settings: Three exemplars. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17, 267293.
  • Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A.Lin & D.Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Weinberg, N., Schmale, J. D., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1995). Computer-mediated support groups. Social Work with Groups, 17, 4355.
  • Weisgerber, C. (2004). Turning to the Internet for help on sensitive medical topics: A qualitative study of the construction of a sleep disorder through online interaction. Information, Communication, & Society, 7, 554574.
  • Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Wills, T. A., & Fegan, M. F. (2001). Social networks and social support. In A.Baum, T. A.Revenson, & J. E.Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 209234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Wortman, C. B., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1979). Interpersonal relationships and cancer: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 120155.
  • Wright, K. B. (2000). Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on-line support groups. Communication Quarterly, 48, 4459.
  • Wright, K. B., & Bell, S. B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the Internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 3954.
  • Wright, K. B., & Miller, C. H. (June, 2006,). A measure of weak tie/strong-tie support network preference: Theoretical rationale, development, and validation of the W/STNP scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
  • Wright, K. B., & Query, J. L., Jr. (2004). Online support and older adults: A theoretical examination of benefits and limitations of computer-mediated support networks for older adults and possible health outcomes. In J. F.Nussbaum & J.Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (2nd ed., pp. 499519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.