SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 10631065.
  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751763.
  • Anderson, N. H. (1962). Application of an additive model to impression formation. Science, 138, 817818.
  • Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 394400.
  • Anderson, N. H. (1968). Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 354362.
  • Arrington, M. (2009). Modeling the true value of social networks: 2009 Edition. Journal. Retrieved June 16, 2009, from http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/04/the-true-value-of-social-networks-the-2009-updated-model/
  • Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99112.
  • Boyd, D. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. Retrieved 6 January 2009, from http://many.corante.com/archives/2006/12/05/friends_friendsters_and_top_8_writing_community_into_being_on_social_network_sites.php.
  • Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210230.
  • Bruckman, A. (1993). Gender Swapping on the Internet. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Internet Society. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved June 20, 1999, from ftp://ftp.cc.gatech.edu/pub/people/asb/gender-swapping.txt
  • Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
  • Buffardi, L. E., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 13031314.
  • Burleson, B. R., & Denton, W. H. (1992). A new look at similarity and attraction in marriage: Similarities in social-cognitive and communication skills as predictors of attraction and satisfaction. Communication Monographs, 59, 268287.
  • Byrne, D. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 3589). New York: Academic Press.
  • Cornwell, B., & Lundgren, D. C. (2001). Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 197211.
  • De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). Impression formation and cooperative behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 305328.
  • Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231251.
  • Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22, 7182.
  • Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119146.
  • Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415441.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 11431168.
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 7783.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Kurz, E. M. (2001). Vicarious functioning reconsidered: A fast and frugal lens model. In K. R.Hammond & T. R.Stewart (Eds.), The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications. (pp. 342348). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
  • Gosling, S. D., Gaddis, D., & Vazire, S. (2007). Personality impressions based on Facebook profiles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (Boulder, Colorado, USA, March 26–28, 2007). Retrieved July 14, 2009, from http://www.icwsm.org/papers/3Gosling-Gaddis-Vazire.pdf.
  • Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379398.
  • Henderson-King, D., Henderson-King, E., & Hoffmann, L. (2001). Media images and women's self-evaluations: Social context and importance of attractiveness as moderators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 14071416.
  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Adams, R., Perry, D. G., Workman, K. A., Furdella, J. Q., & Egan, S. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224251.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A.Pervin, & O. P.John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102138). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 11231134.
  • Krämer, N. C., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20, 106116.
  • Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452463.
  • Marcus, B., Machilek, F., & Schütz, A. (2006). Personality in cyberspace: Personal web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 10141031.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L.Pervin & O.John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139153). New York: Guilford Press.
  • McCroskey, J. C., Hamilton, P. R., & Weiner, A. N. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1, 4252.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1972). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261266.
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415444.
  • Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 561584.
  • Peeters, G. (1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211231.
  • Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 423430.
  • Reeder, G. D., & Coovert, M. D. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4, 117.
  • Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2006). Message in a Ballad: The role of music preferences in interpersonal perception. Psychological Science, 17, 236242.
    Direct Link:
  • Selfhout, M., Denissen, J., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. (2009). In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 11521165.
  • Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, B., & Kelly, E. (1986). The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Sex Roles, 14, 519532.
  • Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689699.
  • Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131142.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 14921512.
  • Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 10231036.
  • Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531549.
  • Uleman, J. S. (1999). Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation. In S.Chaiken & Y.Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 141160). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 211279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Vazire, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 123132.
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 343.
  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L.Knapp & J. A.Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529563) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229253.
  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends' appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 2849.
  • Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155188.
  • Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 12511263.
  • Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 134.