• Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. Observing Interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis, Cambridge, University Press, 1997.
  • Becker-Beck, U., Wintermantel, M. and Borg, A. Principles of Regulating Interaction in Teams Practicing Face-To-Face Communication Versus Teams Practicing Computer-Mediated Communication. Small Group Research, 36, 2005, 499536.
  • Berthold, M.R., Sudweeks, F., Newton, S., Coyne, R.D. Clustering on the Net: Applying an autoassociative neural network to computer-mediated discussions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communi-cation, 2(4), 1997. Received 21st August, 2009 from
  • Bradley, N. & Poppen, W. Assistive technology, computers and Internet may decrease sense of isolation for homebound elderly and disabled persons. Technology and Disability, 15(1); 2003, 1925.
  • Dickinson, A. and Gregor, P. Computer use has no demonstrated impact on the well-being of older adults. International. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(8), 2006, 744753.
  • Erickson, T. Persistent Conversation: An Introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (4), 1999. Received 21st August, 2009 from
  • Eysenbach, G. & Till, J. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323, 2001, pp. 11031105.
  • Fisher, D., Smith, M., & Welser, H. T. You are who you talk to: Detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 2006.
  • Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Human Subjects Research on the Internet. Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1999. Retrieved 21st August, 200 from
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, 1967 Chicago: Aldine.
  • Gloor, P. A. Capturing Team Dynamics through Temporal Social Surfaces. In Proceedings of the Ninth international Conference on information Visualisation, 2005, 939944.
  • Greenfield, P., & Subrahmanyam, K. Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 2003, 713738.
  • Herring, S. Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (4), 1999. Received 21st August, 2009 from
  • Herring, S. and Nix, C. Is “Serious Chat” an Oxymoron? Academic vs. Social Uses of Internet Relay Chat, Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Orlando, FL, 1997.
  • Himelboim, I. Reply distribution in online discussions: A comparative network analysis of political and health newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 2008, pp. 156177.
  • Ito, M, O’Day, V, Adler, A., Linde, C., and Mynatt, E. (2001). Making a Place for Seniors on the Net: SeniorNet, Senior Identity and the Digital Divide. Computers & Society, 13(3), pp. 1521.
  • Jeong, A. Discussion analysis tool (DAT), 2005.
  • Jones, S., and Fox, S. Generations online in 2009. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2009. Retrieved 21st August, 2009 from
  • Jones, Q., Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research, 15 (2), 2004, 194210.
  • Joyce, E., and Kraut, R. E. Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), article 3, 2006. Received 21st August, 2009 from
  • Kalman, Y. M., Ravid, G., Raban, D. R., and Rafaeli, S. Pauses and response latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), article 1, 2006. Received 21st of August, 2009 from
  • Kanayama, T. Ethnographic Research on the Experience of Japanese Elderly People Online. New Media and Society, 5(2); 2003, 26788.
  • King, S. A. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2), pp. 119127.
  • Lapadat, J. Written interaction: A key component in online learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(4), 2002 Received 21st August, 2009 from
  • Maloney-Krichmar, D. and Preece, J. A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions (TOCHI) 12(2), 2005, 201232.
  • MAXqda. The art of text analysis. Software for qualitative data analysis. Website accessed 10th September, 2007 from
  • McMellon, C.A., & Schiffman, L.G. Cybersenior empowerment: How some older individuals are taking control of their lives. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21(2), 2002, 157175.
  • O’Neill, J., & Martin, D. Text chat in action. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 2003, 4049.
  • Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved 21st August, 2009 from
  • Pfeil, U. and Zaphiris, P.. Patterns of empathy in online communication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI ’07. (San Jose, California, USA, April 28 - May 03), 2007, 919928.
  • Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., and Wilson, S. Older People's Perceptions and Experiences of Online Social Support. Interacting with Computers, 21(3), 2009, 159172.
  • Rafaeli, S. and Sudweeks, F. Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4), 1997. Received 21st August, 2009 from
  • Rodgers, S., and Chen, Q. Internet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 5, 2005. Received 21st August, 2009 from
  • Stemler, S. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 2001. Retrieved 21st August, 2009 from
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.), 1998. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wright, K. B. The communication of social support within an online community for older adults: A qualitative analysis of the SeniorNet community. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 1(2), 2000a, 3343.
  • Wright, K. B. Computer-mediated social support, older adults, and coping. Journal of Communication, 50(3), 2000b, 100118.
  • Xie, B. Getting older adults online: The experiences of SeniorNet (USA) and OldKids (China). In: B.Jaeger (Ed.), Young Technologies in Old Hands - An International View on Senior Citizen's Utilization of ICT, 2005, 175204.
  • Xie, B. Older Chinese, the Internet, and well-being. Care Management Journals: Journal of Long Term Home Health Care, 8(1); 2007, 3338.
  • Zaphiris, P., Sarwar, R. Trends, Similarities and Differences in the Usage of Teen and Senior Public Online Newsgroups. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 13(3), 2006, 403422. ACM Press.

Ulrike is a PhD student at the Centre for HCI Design, School of Informatics, City University, London. In her work, she focuses on how elderly people's attitudes, lifestyles and values impact on their usage of online support communities. She believes that eliciting how elderly people view the benefits and challenges of online social support helps us to understand how to design online support communities specifically for this target population.

Address: Centre for HCI Design, City University, London. Northampton Square, EC1 0HB, London

Panayiotis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Multimedia and Graphic Arts at Cyprus University of Technology. His research areas are in the area of Human Computer Interaction, Social Computing and Inclusive Design with an emphasis on the design of interactive systems for people with disabilities and the elderly.

Address: Department of Multimedia & Graphic Arts, Cyprus University of Technology. P.O. Box 50329, Limassol 3603, Cyprus

Stephanie is a Senior Lecturer and Senior Tutor for Research in the Centre for HCI Design at City University London. Her research is concerned with understanding the work that people do and exploring the design and evaluation of novel interaction technologies to support that work. Most recently, her focus has been on systems to support collaboration and coordination of work in the healthcare domain.

Address: Centre for HCI Design, City University, London. Northampton Square, EC1 0HB, London