SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H.Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie.
  • Asch, S. E. (1965). Effect of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In J. H.Campbell & H.Helpler (Eds.), Dimension in communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Aronson, E. (1995). The Social Animal. (7th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Beniger, J. R. (1987). The personalization of mass media and the growth of pseudo community. Communication Research, 14(3), 252371.
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Caplan, S. E. (2001). Challenging the mass-interpersonal communication dichotomy: Are we witnessing the emergence of an entirely new communication system? Electronic Journal of Communication, 11(1).
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • comScore (2005, August). Blogosphere: Understanding the scale, composition and activities of weblog audiences. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.comscore.com/blogreport/comScoreBlogReport.pdf
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Reflections on the “Spiral of Silence”. In J. A.Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 14 (pp. 288297). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531537.
  • Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 2959). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Ellis, D., & Maoz, I. (2007). Online argument between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 291309.
  • Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323(10), 11031105.
  • Flanagin, A. J., Tiyaamornwong, V., O’Connor, J., & Seibold, D. R. (2002). Computer-mediated group work: The interaction of member sex and anonymity. Communication Research, 29(1), 6693.
  • Froomkin, A. M. (1995). Anonymity and its enmities. Retrieved May 1, 2003, from http://www.wm.edu/law/publications/jol/95_96/froomkin.html
  • Glynn, C. J., & McLeod, J. M. (1984a). Implications of the spiral of silence theory for communication and public opinion research. In K. R.Sanders, L. L.Kaid, & D.Nimmo (Eds.), Political communication yearbook (pp. 4365). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Glynn, C. J., & McLeod, J. M. (1984b). Public opinion du Jour: An examination of the spiral of silence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(4), 731740.
  • Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one's opinions and willingness to speak out: A Meta-analysis of survey studies on the “Spiral of Silence.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452463.
  • Goldwin, M. (1994). Nine principles for making virtual communities work. Retrieved May 1, 2003, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.06/vc.principles.html
  • Gonzenbach, W. J. (1992). The conformity hypothesis: Empirical considerations for the spiral of silence's first link. Journalism Quarterly, 69(3), 633645.
  • Gonzenbach, W. J., & Stevenson, R. L. (1994). Children with AIDS attending public school: An analysis of the spiral of silence. Political Communication, 11, 318.
  • Griffin, D., & Buehler, R. (1993). Role of construal processes in conformity and dissent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 647669.
  • Harp, D., & Tremayne, M. (2006). The gendered blogosphere: Examining inequality using network and feminist theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 247264.
  • Hayne, S. C., & Rice, R. E. (1997). Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 47, 429452.
  • Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the Relationship between instant messaging and Intimacy. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(1).
  • Jeffres, L. W., Neuendorf, K. A., & Atkin, D. (1999). Spiral of silence: Expressing opinions when the climate of opinion is unambiguous. Political Communication, 16, 115131.
  • Kennamer, J. D. (1990). Self-serving biases in perceiving the opinions of others: Implications for the Spiral of Silence. Communication Research, 17(3), 393404.
  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 11231134.
  • Kollock, P. (1998). Design principles for online communities. OC Update, 15(5), 5860.
  • Kollock, P. (1999). The production of trust in online markets. In E. J.Lawler, M.Macy, S.Thyne, & H. A.Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Vol. 16. (pp. 99123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822832.
  • Lasorsa, D. L. (1991). Political outspokenness: Factors working against spiral of silence. Journalism Quarterly, 68(1/2), 131140.
  • Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation, and group decision-making. In S.Greenberg (Ed.). Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware: Computers & people series (pp. 155173). London: Academic press.
  • Lee, E.-J. (2006). When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research, 33(6), 423447.
  • Lee, E.-J., & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 349381.
  • Levin, T. R., Weber, R., Park, H., & Hullett, C. (2008) A communication researcher's guide to null hypothesis significance testing and alternatives. Human Communication Research, 34, 188209.
  • May, T. (1994). The cyphernomicon: MFAQ–Most frequently asked questions. Retrieved May 1, 2003, from http://munitions.vipul.net/documents/cyphernomicon/
  • McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., & Williams, J. E. (2000). The integrity of web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11(6), 502506.
    Direct Link:
  • McDevitt, M., Kiousis, S., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2003). Spiral of moderation: Opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(4), 454470.
  • Moreno-Riaño, G. (2002). Experimental implications for the spiral of silence. The Social Science Journal, 39, 6581.
  • Neuwirth, K. & Frederick, E. (2004). Peer and social influence on opinion expression: Combining the theories of planned behavior and the spiral of silence. Communication Research, 31(6), 669703.
  • Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2007). The spiral of silence and fear of isolation. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 450468.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: A response. In K. R.Sanders, L. L.Kaid, & D.Nimmo (Eds.), Political communication yearbook (pp. 6694). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence. Chicago: The university of Chicago press.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E., & Peterson, T. (2004). The spiral of silence and the social nature of man. In L. E.Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 339356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Oshagan, H. (1996). Reference group influence on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(4), 335354.
  • Pan, Z., & McLeod, J. M. (1991). Multilevel analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18(2), 140173.
  • Pingree, S., Hawkins, R., Yun, G. W., Park, S.-Y., & Serlin, R. (2000, August). Consumers' use of science content and site address to evaluate web health stories. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Tempe, AZ.
  • Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(3), 238259.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 12431254.
  • Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, 16, 4774.
  • Rains, S. A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34(1), 100125.
  • Rice, R. E. (1988). Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication systems. Communication Yearbook, 16, 436476. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Salmon, C. T., & Kline, G. (1984). The spiral of silence ten years later: An examination and evaluation. In K. R.Sanders, L. L.Kaid, & D.Nimmo (Eds.), Political communication Yearbook (pp. 330). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Salmon, C. T., & Neuwirth, K. (1990). Perception of opinion “Climates” and willingness to discuss the issue of abortion. Journalism Quarterly, 67(3), 567577.
  • Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 328.
  • Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., & Lee, E. (2001). Real talk: Manipulating the dependent variable in spiral of silence research. Communication Research, 28(3), 304324.
  • Shamir, J. (1995). Information cues and indicators of the climate of opinion: The spiral of silence theory in the Intifada. Communication Research, 22(1), 2453.
  • Sinekopova, G. (2006). Building the public sphere: Bases and biases. Journal of communication, 56(3), 505522.
  • Slater, M. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281303.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connection: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Stromer-Galley, J., & Foot, K. A. (2002). Citizen perceptions of online interactivity and implications for political campaign communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1).
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Taylor, D. G. (1982). Pluralistic ignorance and the spiral of silence: A formal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(3), 311335.
  • Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 332348.
  • Tsfati, Y. (2003). Media skepticism and climate of opinion perception. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(1), 6582.
  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. New York, NY: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Tyron, W. W. (2001). Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 371386.
  • Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 11241151.
  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167194). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Wright, K. (2002). Social support within an on-line cancer community: an assessment of emotional support, perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community from a communication perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(3), 195209.