SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, T., & Emmers-Sommer, T. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57(2), 153172.
  • Antonijevic, S. (2008). From text to gesture online: a microethnographic analysis of nonverbal communication in the Second Life environment. Information, Communication & Society 11(2), 221238.
  • Beaudoin, C. (2008). Explaining the relationship between internet use and interpersonal trust: Taking into account motivation and information overload. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 550568.
  • Bell, M. (2008). Toward a definition of “virtual worlds”. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research. 1(1). Retrieved July 18, 2009 from http://jvwresearch.org.
  • Boellstorff, T. (2008) Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for persons with disabilities. Health Communication, 11,(2), 123151.
  • Bunde, M., Suls, J., Martin, R., & Barnett, K. (2006). Hystersisters online: Social support and social comparison among hysterectomy patients on the internet. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(3), 271278.
  • Campbell, K., & Wright, K. B. (2002). On-line support groups: An investigation of relationships among source credibility, dimensions of relational communication, and perceptions of emotional support. Communication Research Reports, 19(2), 183193.
  • Cawyer, C., & Smith-Dupre, A. (1995). Communicating social support: Identifying supportive episodes in an HIV/AIDS support group. Communication Quarterly, 43(3), 243358.
  • Choi, A., & Chen, W. (2006, June). Online social support and intercultural adaptation. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association. Dresden, Germany.
  • Colvin, J., Chenoweth, L., Bold, M., & Harding, C. (2004). Caregivers of older adults: Advantages and disadvantages of internet-based social support. Family Relations, 53, 4957.
  • Coulson, N. S. (2005). Receiving social support online: An analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 580584.
  • Davey-Rothwell, M. A., Kuramoto, S. J., & Latkin, C. A. (2008). Social networks, norms and 12-step group participation. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 34, 185193.
  • Diehl, W., & Prins, E. (2008). Unintended outcomes in Second Life: Intercultural literacy and cultural identity in a virtual world. Language and Intercultural Communication, 8(22), 101118.
  • Eichhorn, K. C. (2008). Soliciting and providing social support over the internet: An investigation of online eating disorder support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 6778.
  • Feng-yang K., & Chia-ping, Y. (2009). An exploratory study of trust dynamics in work-oriented virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4), 823854.
  • Flowers, A., Gregson, K., & Trigilio, J. (2009, April). Web interaction from 2D to 3D: New dimensions in company-stakeholder communications in Second Life. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association convention. Philadelphia, PA.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Gong, L., & Nass, C. (2007). When a talking-face computer agent is half-human and half-humanoid: Human identity and consistency preference. Human Communication Research, 33, 163193.
  • Gustafson, D., Hawkins, R., McTavish, F., Pingree, S., & Shaw, B. (2006). Effects of insightful disclosure within computer mediated support groups on women with breast cancer. Health Communication. 19(2), 133142.
  • Harrison, R. (2009). Excavating Second Life. Journal of Material Culture, 14(1), 75106.
  • Kabela-Cormier, E., Kadden, M., Litt, M., & Petry, N. (2007). Changing network support for drinking: Initial findings from the network support project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 542555.
  • Kingsley, J., & Wankel, C. (2009). Introduction. In C.Wankel & J.Kingsley (Eds.), Higher education in virtual worlds: Teaching and learning in Second Life. (pp. 19). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald.
  • Kleinman, S. S. (2000). Social identification in a computer-mediated group for women in science and engineering. Science Communication 21(4), 344366.
  • Lin, C., & Anol, B. (2008). Learning online social support: An investigation of network information technology based on UTAUT. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 268272.
  • Martin, J. (2008). Consuming code: Use-value, exchange-value, and the role of virtual goods in Second Life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(2). Retrieved July 18, 2009 from http://jvwresearch.org
  • Miller, K. I., Shoemaker, M. M., Willyard, J., & Addison, P. (2008). Providing care for elderly parents: A structurational approach to family caregiver identity. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 1943.
  • Nicholas, D. B., Picone, G., Vigneux, A., McCormick, K., McClure, M., & MacCulloch, R., (2009). Evaluation of an online peer support network for adolescents with chronic kidney disease. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 27, 2333.
  • Norris, J. (2009). The growth and direction of healthcare support groups in virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(2). Retrieved July 18, 2009 from http://jvwresearch.org.
  • Nowak, K., & Rauh, C. (2006). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 153178.
  • Oh, H., & Lee, B. (2009, May). The effect of computer-mediated social support in online communities on patient empowerment and doctor-patient communication. Paper presented to the 59th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Paul, C. (2009). Culture and practice: What we do, not just where we are. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(3), 36.
  • Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., & Wilson, S. (2010). The role of message-sequences in the sustainability of an online support community for older people. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 336363.
  • Robinson, J., & Turner, J. (2003). Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal social support: Cancer and older adults. Health Communication, 15(2), 227234.
  • Rodgers, S., & Chen, Q. (2005). Internet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(4), article 5. Retrieved April 11, 2010 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/rodgers.html.
  • Rumsey, E. (2004, May). Assessing needs through the study of online support sites. Paper presented to the 54th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Sen, N. (2008, November). Online social support for cancer patients: Effects of stress, shyness, and family support. Paper presented at the 94th Annual National Communication Association convention. San Diego, CA.
  • Sherblom, J. C. (2010). The computer-mediated communication (CMC) classroom: A challenge of medium, presence, interaction, identity, and relationship. Communication Education. 59(4), 516542.
  • Sherblom, J. C., Withers, L. A., & Leonard, L. G., (2009, February). Interpersonal Uncertainty Reduction in Second Life. Paper presented to the Western States Communication Association convention. Phoenix, AZ.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Tanis, M. (2008). Health related on-line forums: What's the big attraction? Journal of Health Communication (13), 698714.
  • Tanis, M., Das, E., & Fortgens-Sillmann, M. (2009, May). Who gives care to the caregiver: Effects of online social support groups on wellbeing of people taking care of others? Paper presented to the International Communication Association convention. Chicago, IL.
  • Till, J. E. (2003). Evaluation of support groups for women with breast cancer: Importance of the navigator role. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(16), Retrieved April 7, 2010 from http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/16.
  • Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J., (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 231251.
  • Van Lear, C. A., Sheehan, M., Withers, L. A., & Walker, R. A., (2005). AA online: The enactment of supportive computer mediated communication. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 526.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • Wright, K. B. (1997). Shared ideology in Alcoholics Anonymous: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Health Communication 2, 8399.
  • Wright, K. B. (1999). Computer-mediated support groups: An examination of relationships among social support, perceived stress, and coping strategies. Communication Quarterly, 47(4), 402414.
  • Wright, K. B. (2000). Social support satisfaction, on-line communication apprehension and perceived life stress within computer-mediated support groups. Communication Research Reports, 17(2), 139147.
  • Wright, K. B. (2002a). Social support within an on-line cancer community: An assessment of emotional support perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community from a communication perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(1), 195209.
  • Wright, K. B. (2002b). Motives for communication within on-line support groups and antecedents for interpersonal use. Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 8998.
  • Wright, K. B., & Bell, S. B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the Internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8(1), 3954.
  • Wynns, S. L., & Rosenfeld, L. B. (2004). A test of competing models of the influence of social support on school engagement in the presence of neighborhood danger. Communication Research Reports, 21(4), 366378.
  • Yun, H., Park, S., Kim, H., Yoo, J., Kwak, Y., & Kang, K. H. (2004, May). The rise and fall of online social support group level predictors. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.