SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888918.
  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thoughts and actions. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573590.
  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210230.
  • Brady, H. E., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (1999). Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. The American Political Science Review, 93(1), 153168.
  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 12871335.
  • Chavis, D. M., Lee, K. S., & Acosta, J. D. (2008). The sense of community (SCI) revised: The reliability and validity of the SCI-2. Paper presented at the 2nd annual International Community Psychology Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752766.
  • Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 575630.
  • Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Council for Aid to Education. (2009). Voluntary support of education. New York, NY.
  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3) 629636.
  • Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  • Elliot, D. (2006). The kindness of strangers: Philanthropy and higher education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 11431168.
  • Fayard, A-L., and DeSanctis, G. (2005). Evolution of an online forum for knowledge management professionals: A language game analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 2.
  • Feld, S. (1997). Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Social Networks, 19(1), 9195.
  • Freeman, R. B. (1997). Working for nothing: The supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), S140S166.
  • Gilbert, E. & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. CHI ’09 Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 201-210.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 13601380.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201233.
  • Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277311.
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information Communication and Society, 8(2), 125147.
  • Johnson, D. & Grayson, K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationshps. Journal of Business Research, 58, 500507.
  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers - steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519531.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York City, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Krackhardt, D. (1992). The Strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N.Nohria & R.Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C., (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. CSCW ’06 Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference of Computer supported cooperative work, 167–170.
  • Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482501.
  • McCauley, C. (1989). The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 250260.
  • McMillan, D., & Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 623.
  • Obst, P. L. & White, K. M. (2004). Revisiting the Sense of Community Index: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(6), 691705.
  • Performance Enhancement Group, Ltd. (2005). PCUAD alumni attitude study . Unpublished document.
  • Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, T. J. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Spinger-Verlag.
  • Preece, J., and Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2005). Online communities: Design, theory, and practice. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 1.
  • Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., & Witte, J. (2002). Capitalizing on the Internet: Network capital, participatory capital, and sense of community. In B.Wellman & C.Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291324). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1977). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. London: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1997). Social participation and charitable giving: A multivariate analysis. Voluntas, 8(3), 235260.
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. E., & Nie, N. (1990). American citizen participation study data collection instrument. (Available from the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, P. O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106)
  • Webb, C. H. (2002). The role of alumni relations in fund raising. In M. J.Worth (Ed.), New strategies for educational fund raising (pp. 332338). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishing.
  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215240.
  • Wilson, J. & Musick, M. A. (1999). Attachment to volunteering. Sociological Forum, 14(2), 243272.
  • Wortham, J. (2010, January 15). Burst of mobile giving adds millions in relief funds. New York Times , p. A14.
  • Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2010). Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site. CHI ’10 Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1955–1964.
  • Young, D. R. (2003). New trends in the U.S. non-profit sector: Towards market integration? In A.Noya & C.Nativel (Eds.), The non-profit sector in a changing economy (pp. 6178). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Yuan, Y. C., Fulk, J., Shumate, M., Monge, P., Bryant, J.A., & Matsaganis, M. (2005). Individual participation in organizational information commons: The impact of team level social influence and technology-specific competence. Human Communication Research, 31(2), 212240.
  • Zanna, M. P. & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D.Bar-Tal and A. W.Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.