SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A. R. (2003). Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text , 23(3), 321347.
  • Bach, K., & Hamish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bell, P. (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 1034). London: Sage.
  • boyd, d., (2008). Why youth heart social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media (pp. 119142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 27082). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Cherny, L. (1994). Gender differences in text-based virtual reality. In M. Bucholtz, A. Liang, & L. Sutton (Eds.), Cultural performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
  • Coates, J. (1993). Women, men and language . London: Longman.
  • Danet, B. (1998). Text as mask: Gender and identity on the Internet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0 (pp. 129158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Durham, G. M. (2008). The Lolita effect: The media sexualization of young girls and what we can do about it. Woodstock & New York, NY: The Overlook Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements . London: Macmillan.
  • Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633649.
  • Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2007). Students' linguistic behavior in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior , 23(5), 22402255.
  • Eckert, P. (1996). Vowels and nail polish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In N. Warner, J. Ahlers, L. Bilmes, M. Oliver, S. Wertheim, & M. Chen (Eds.), Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women & Language Conference (pp. 183190). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women & Language Group.
  • Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 11(2), article 2. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html
  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis . Oxford, UK: Norton.
  • Francis, G., & Hunston, S. (1992). Analysing everyday conversation. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 134). London: Routledge.
  • Frederickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75(1), 269284.
  • Hall, E. (1966). The hidden dimension . New York: Doubleday.
  • Herring, S. C. (1992). Gender and participation in computer-mediated linguistic discourse. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, doc ED345552. Retrieved March 17, 2010 from http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/herring/participation.1992.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication , 3(2). Retrieved March 17, 2010 from http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/herring/ejc.txt
  • Herring, S. C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz, A. Liang, L. Sutton, & C. Hines (Eds.), Cultural performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 278294). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
  • Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202228). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4, article 1. Retrieved March 17, 2010 from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761
  • Herring, S. C., & Paolillo, J. C., (2006). Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics , 10(4), 439459.
  • Herring, S. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2009). Symbolic capital in a virtual heterosexual market: Abbreviation and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. Written Communication , 26(1), 531.
  • Herring, S. C., Das, A., & Penumarthy, S. (2005). CMC act taxonomy. Retrieved March 17, 2010 from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/herring/cmc.acts.html
  • Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2). Retrieved March 17, 2010 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html
  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Koch, S. C., Mueller, B., Kruse, L., & Zumbach, J. (2005). Constructing gender in chat groups. Sex Roles, 53(1/2), 2941.
  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design . New York: Routledge.
  • Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and woman's place. NY: Harper & Row.
  • Lambiase, J. (2003). Codes of online sexuality: Celebrity, gender and marketing on the Web. Sexuality & Culture, 7(3), 5778.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Magnuson, M. J., & Dundes, L. (2008). Gender differences in “social portraits” reflected in MySpace Profiles. CyberPsychology & Behavior , 11(2), 239241.
  • Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology , 29(6), 446458.
  • McRae, S. (1996). Coming apart at the seams: Sex, text and the virtual body. In L. Cherny & E. Weise (Eds.), Wired_women (pp. 242263). Seattle: Seal Press.
  • Paolillo, J. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (In press). Real-time chat. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication . Berlin: Mouton.
  • Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC 2001 . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547577.
  • Pew Internet and American Life Project (2007). Teens and social media. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved March 16, 2010 from http://www.pewinternet.org//media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Social_Media_Final.pdf.pdf
  • Rodino, M. (1997). Breaking out of binaries: Reconceptualizing gender and its relationship to language in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 3(3). Retrieved March 17, 2010 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue3/rodino.html
  • Scheidt, L. A. (2004, May). Buxom girls and boys in baseball hats: Adolescent avatars in graphical chat spaces. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved March 17, 2010 from http://loisscheidt.com/working_papers_archive/Buxom_girls_and_boys_in_baseball_hats.pdf
  • Selfe, C. L., & Meyer, P. R. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication , 8(2), 163192.
  • Siibak, A. (2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection: Visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(1), article 1. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009061501&article=1
  • Smahel, D., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2007). “Any girls want to chat press 911:” Partner selection in monitored and unmonitored teen chat rooms. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 346353.
  • Soley, L. C., & Reid, L. N. (1988). Taking it off: Are models in magazine ads wearing less? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 960966.
  • Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P. M., & Tynes, B. (2004). Constructing sexuality and identity in an online teen chat room. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology , 25(6), 651666.
  • Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel D., & Greenfield, P. M. (2006). Connecting developmental constructions to the Internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 395406.
  • Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse . New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D. & Uppal, S. (2010). Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 61(1), 190199.
  • Thomson, R., & Murachver, T. (2001). Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology , 40, 193208.
  • Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 34(8), 10231036.
  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles , 36, 305325.
  • Whitty, M. T. (2008). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual‘ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior , 24, 17071723.