SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackland, R. (Apr 24, 2007). E-researching the information society. Presentation at Oxford Internet Institute. Presentation file retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://voson.anu.edu.au/papers/Beijing_presentation_Ackland.pdf
  • Ackland, R., Gibson, R., Lusoli, W., & Ward, S. (2010). Engaging with the public? Assessing the online presence and communication practices of the nanotechnology industry, Social Science Computer Review, 28 (4), 443465.
  • Adamic, L., & Adar, E. (2003). Friends and neighbors on the Web. Social Networks, 25(3), 211230.
  • Porter, A. L., Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2009). Nano social science: An emerging specialization? Retrieved October 8, 2009 from http://cns.asu.edu/cns-library/year/?action=getfile&file=15&section=lib
  • Barnett, G. A. (2008). The role of the Internet in cultural identity. In L. W. Leung, A. Y. H. Fung, & P. S. N. Lee (eds.), Embedding into our lives: New opportunities and challenges of the Internet (pp. 347368), Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702734.
  • Chung, C. J., & Park, H. W. (2010). Textual analysis of a political message: The inaugural addresses of two Korean presidents. Social Science Information, 49 (2), 215239.
  • Doerfel, M. L., & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the international communication association. Human Communication Research, 25(4): 589603.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix innovation: Industry, university, and government in action. London: Routledge.
  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and Mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(22), 109123.
  • Freeman, C. (1988). Japan, a new system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R.R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Ed.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 3154). London: Pinter.
  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215239.
  • Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved September 19, 2000 from http://ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/garton.htm
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  • Goktepe, D. (2003). The triple helix as a model to analyze Israeli magnet program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey. Scientometrics, 58(2), 219239.
  • Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104, 14391493.
  • Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). The manufacture of consent. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Kincaid, D. L. (2002). Drama, emotion, and cultural convergence. Communication Theory, 12(2), 136152.
  • Lee, S. J., Kim, J. H., Rosen, D. (2009). A semantic network and categorical content analysis of Internet and online media research. Open Communication Journal, 3, 1528.
  • Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics 58(2), 445467.
  • Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry- government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23, 279286.
  • Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations: Guest editorial. Scientometrics 58(2), 191203.
  • Leydesdorff, L. & Zawdie, G. (2010). The Triple Helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 789804.
  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349369). London: Pinter.
  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation. London: Pinter.
  • Lusher, D. & Ackland, R. (2011). A relational hyperlink analysis of an online social movement: Asylum seeker advocacy groups in Australia. Journal of Social Structure, 12(5).
  • Marres, N., & Rogers, R. (2000). Depluralising the web, repluralising public debate: The case of the GM Food Debate on the Web. In Rogers R. (Ed.), Preferred placement: Knowledge politics on the web (pp. 113136). Jan van Eyck Editions: Maastricht.
  • Nam, Y., & Barnett, G.A., (2010). Communication media diffusion and substitutions: Longitudinal trends from 1980 to 2005 in Korea. New Media and Society, 12(7), 11371155.
  • Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Park, H. W., & Jankowski, N. (2008). A hyperlink network analysis of citizen blogs in South Korean politics. Javnost-The Public, 15(2), 5774.
  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university- industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640649.
  • Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(4).
  • Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Developing network indicators for ideological landscapes from the political blogosphere in South Korea. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication. 13(4), 856879.
  • Park, H. W., Barnett, G. A., & Nam, I.-Y. (2002). Hyperlink-affiliation network structure of the top web sites: Examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 592601.
  • Park, H. W. (2010). Mapping the e-science landscape in South Korea using the webometrics method. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 211229.
  • Park, H. W., & Kluver, R. (2009). Trends in online networking among South Korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 505515.
  • Rafols, I. (2007) Strategies for knowledge acquisition in bionanotechnology: Why are interdisciplinary practices less widespread than expected? Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research. 20(4), 395412.
  • Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2007) How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70(3), 633650.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. New York : The Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
  • Shapira, P., Youtie, J., and Porter, A. (2010). The emergence of social science research on nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 85(2), 595611.
  • Shapiro, M., So, M. H., & Park. H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 845857.
  • Shinn, T. (2003). The ‘Triple Helix’ and ‘new production of knowledge’ as socio-cognitive fields. In B. Joerges & H. Nowotny (eds.), Social studies of science and technology: Looking back, ahead (pp. 103116). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Terveen, L., & Hill, W. (1998, Nov.). Evaluating emergent collaboration on the Web. Paper presented at the Conference of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA.
  • Thelwall, M. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics. New York: Morgan & Claypool.
  • Ward, J. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236244.
  • Yang, C. H., Park, H. W., & Heo, J. (2010). A network analysis of interdisciplinary research relationships: The Korean government's R&D grant program. Scientometrics. 83(1), 7792.
  • Zywica, J. & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 138.