Thanks to Margaret Alexander, Simon Gächter, Bryan Garsten, Philip Gorski, Molly O'Grady, Della Ulibarri, Joy Lecuyer, Elisabeth Wood, David Laitin, and Daria Roithmayr for comments. I am particularly grateful to Joshua Cohen, Philippe van Parijs, Seana Shiffrin and other members of the September Seminar, and to the Santa Fe Institute working group on the coevolution of institutions and preferences for their contributions to this article, and to the Behavioral Sciences Program of the SFI and the U.S. National Science Foundation for support.
Is Liberal Society a Parasite on Tradition?
Article first published online: 22 MAR 2011
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Philosophy & Public Affairs
Volume 39, Issue 1, pages 46–81, Winter 2011
How to Cite
BOWLES, S. (2011), Is Liberal Society a Parasite on Tradition?. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39: 46–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01201.x
- Issue published online: 22 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 22 MAR 2011
This article has been cited by:
- 1Impartial Institutions, Pathogen Stress and the Expanding Social Network, Human Nature, 2014, 25, 4, 567, , , , , , , , , ,
- 2Neoliberalism in the Laboratory? Experimental Economics on Markets and their Limits, New Political Economy, 2014, 19, 4, 507, ,
- 3Morals and Markets, Science, 2013, 340, 6133, 707, ,
- 4Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements?, Journal of Economic Literature, 2012, 50, 2, 368, ,