*Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.
Plasticity of fish body shape. The effects of diet, development, family and age in two species of Geophagus (Pisces: Cichlidae)
Article first published online: 14 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00640.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
WIMBERGER, P. H. (1992), Plasticity of fish body shape. The effects of diet, development, family and age in two species of Geophagus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 45: 197–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00640.x
- †
*Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 14 JAN 2008
- Received 25 July 1990, accepted for publication 9 October 1990
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Phenotypic plasticity;
- cichlids;
- Geophagus;
- trophic polymorphism;
- variation;
- body shape
Fish body shape is affected by the genetic makeup of an individual as well as environmental influences, such as diet, development, growth rate and nutrition. Fishes in the family Cichlidae exhibit tremendous morphological diversity in body shape and morphology related to feeding. Certain aspects of cichlid feeding morphology have been shown to be plastic in response to different diets but plasticity in body shape has not been examined previously. Plasticity affects ecological interactions, the direction and rate of evolution, and has ramifications for characters used in systematic studies. I examined the effect of different diets: chironomid larvae (bloodworms) and brine shrimp nauplii, on body shape in two species of the Neotropical cichlid genus Geophagus which differ in the size at which young begin feeding on external food sources. The fry of G. brasiliensis, a substrate spawner, begin to feed on external food sources earlier than the fry of G. steindachneri, a mouthbrooder. I hypothesized that the difference in size at first feeding could lead to a difference in the amount of plasticity inducible in the two species. The magnitudes of changes were mostly similar, although G. brasiliensis responded to the different diets with slightly greater changes in some of the head measurements. The pattern of changes in the two species were also similar, with fish fed ferine shrimp nauplii developing longer and shallower heads and shallower bodies and tails than fish fed chironomid larvae. I also examined the consequences of considering family and age as additional factors besides diet in G. steindachneri. Considering family or age as additional factors in the analyses did not change the conclusion that different diets induce differences, albeit small ones, in body shape. I argue that morphological plasticity is dependent on behavioural flexibility and that it may enhance evolutionary morphological diversification.

1095-8312/asset/BIJ_left.gif?v=1&s=3ab8368fa3c39ed66058179df55ed162bb0f3985)
1095-8312/asset/BIJ_right.gif?v=1&s=fd03b1bec8a9fb68afd77504fbf94db4d8322763)
1095-8312/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=9cbfec89d349d36b9aaef98d47e41aad9a141601)