Phylogeny, diversification patterns and historical biogeography of euglossine orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
Article first published online: 29 JUN 2010
© 2010 The Linnean Society of London
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume 100, Issue 3, pages 552–572, July 2010
How to Cite
RAMÍREZ, S. R., ROUBIK, D. W., SKOV, C. and PIERCE, N. E. (2010), Phylogeny, diversification patterns and historical biogeography of euglossine orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 100: 552–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01440.x
- Issue published online: 29 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 29 JUN 2010
- Received 13 October 2009; revised 5 January 2010; accepted for publication 6 January 2010
Table S1. Models of sequence evolution used for individual loci (determined via likelihood ratio test) employed in the locus-specific partitions for Bayesian phylogenetic analyses.
Table S2. Mean and standard deviation divergence times (in Myr) calculated for individual nodes of Euglossini via penalized likelihood (PL) and mean path length (MPL). Two sets of age constraints corresponding to the younger and older fossil age boundaries were implemented (see text for details). Numbered nodes indicate constrained nodes, and letters indicate selected nodes for which summary statistics are provided.
Table S3. Estimated parameters and hypothesis testing using diversification survival models of orchid bee lineages. An asterisk indicates the best-fit model for each subclade. Parameter values in parentheses correspond to the estimated errors, unless otherwise indicated.
Table S4. The area between the curves corresponds to the difference between the observed and the null disparity-through-time plots from Fig. 9. The average null disparity curves in each case were based on simulated data using two models of character evolution (Brownian and speciation). Positive areas indicate a higher than expected overall morphological disparity, whereas negative areas indicate that the observed disparity was lower than expected via simulations.
Appendix S1. Collection data, taxonomic information and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank accession numbers of samples used in the present study. Species with incomplete sequences from more than a single specimen were merged, and are indicated with an asterisk (*).
Appendix S2. Mean values ± SD of morphological measurements for a subset of orchid bee species.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
|BIJ_1440_sm_Tables.doc||63K||Supporting info item|
|BIJ_1440_sm_Appendices.doc||405K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.