Modularity in attachment organs of African Cichlidogyrus (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) reflects phylogeny rather than host specificity or geographic distribution
Article first published online: 10 FEB 2011
© 2011 The Linnean Society of London
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume 102, Issue 3, pages 694–706, March 2011
How to Cite
VIGNON, M., PARISELLE, A. and VANHOVE, M. P. M. (2011), Modularity in attachment organs of African Cichlidogyrus (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) reflects phylogeny rather than host specificity or geographic distribution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102: 694–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01607.x
- Issue published online: 10 FEB 2011
- Article first published online: 10 FEB 2011
- Received 22 July 2010; revised 8 October 2010; accepted for publication 8 October 2010
Figure S1. Ventral anchor.
Figure S2. Dorsal anchor.
Figure S3. Ventral bar.
Figure S4. Dorsal bar.
Figure S5. Uncinuli I, II and III (from left to right).
Figure S6. Distribution of landmarks and semi-landmarks: landmarks and semi-landmarks were distributed at equal intervals along the outline of the mean shape (consensus) of each sclerite. The number of semi-landmarks between each pair of consecutive landmarks is indicated. These numbers were subsequently used for all species.
Table S1. List of species ordered alphabetically.
Table S2. Geographical distribution of Cichlidogyrus spp. in Africa. Presence in black according to Pariselle & Euzet (2009) and inferred continuous ranges in grey.
|BIJ_1607_sm_Fig_S1-S6_Tab_S1-S2.pdf||382K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.