SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Derek Partridge, 1 July 1858 and the 1844 essay: what Lyell and Hooker decided; and what Darwin did not want and did not know, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 115, 3
  2. 2
    John van Wyhe, A Delicate Adjustment: Wallace and Bates on the Amazon and “The Problem of the Origin of Species”, Journal of the History of Biology, 2014, 47, 4, 627

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    James T. Costa, George Beccaloni, Deepening the darkness? Alfred Russel Wallace in the Malay Archipelago, Current Biology, 2014, 24, 22, R1070

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    D. A. Morrison, On the Organic Law of Change: A Facsimile Edition and Annotated Transcription of Alfred Russel Wallace's Species Notebook of 1855-1859.--Edited and annotated by James T. Costa., Systematic Biology, 2014, 63, 2, 284

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Roy Davies, 1 July 1858: what Wallace knew; what Lyell thought he knew; what both he and Hooker took on trust; and what Charles Darwin never told them, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 109, 3
  6. 6
    Charles H. Smith, A further look at the 1858 Wallace–Darwin mail delivery question, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 108, 3
  7. 7
    John A. Allen, Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 108, 1
  8. 8
    J. T. Costa, Engaging with Lyell: Alfred Russel Wallace’s Sarawak Law and Ternate papers as reactions to Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology, Theory in Biosciences, 2013, 132, 4, 225

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Dispelling the Darkness, 2013,

    CrossRef

  10. You have free access to this content10
    ROY DAVIES, How Charles Darwin received Wallace's Ternate paper 15 days earlier than he claimed: a comment on van Wyhe and Rookmaaker (2012), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 105, 2