Cytogeography of the Phleum pratense group (Poaceae) in the Carpathians and Pannonia

Authors

  • MARIÁN PERNÝ,

    Corresponding author
    1. Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 14, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
    Search for more papers by this author
  • VLADISLAV KOLARČIK,

    1. Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 14, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
    Search for more papers by this author
  • L'UBOŠ MAJESKÝ,

    1. Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 14, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
    2. P. J. Šafárik University, Faculty of Science, Institute of Biology and Ecology, Department of Botany, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovak Republic
    Search for more papers by this author
  • PAVOL MÁRTONFI

    1. P. J. Šafárik University, Faculty of Science, Institute of Biology and Ecology, Department of Botany, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovak Republic
    Search for more papers by this author

*e-mail: marian.perny@savba.sk

Abstract

Cytogeographical variability within the Phleum pratense group in the Carpathians and adjacent part of Pannonian lowland, based on 132 populations analysed by flow cytometry, is described. Only diploid and hexaploid plants were detected among 635 samples from the studied area. Diploids were found to be less frequent (127 plants, 20%) than hexaploids (508, 80%). With the exception of the single pure diploid population, diploids always co-occured with hexaploids (30 localities, 22.7%). The majority of populations (101, 76.5%) consisted of hexaploid plants. Most mixed populations occur in the Western Carpathians (26). In the Eastern Carpathians, mixed populations are much rarer, with three populations in Ukraine and one in Romania. In the Southern Carpathians, only hexaploids occur. The conventional taxonomic concept of the two species, diploid P. bertolonii and hexaploid P. pratense, was followed in spite of their sympatric occurence. Distribution maps based on chromosome number data from previous studies and on ploidy level estimates are given for both species in the studied area. The pattern of different distribution of the two taxa within the Carpathians is discussed. © 2008 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 157, 475–485.

Ancillary