Present address: Tree of Life Woodworking and Design, P. O. Box 454, Belfast, ME 04915, U.S.A.
Relative abundance and size of coastal sharks derived from commercial shark longline catch and effort data
Article first published online: 18 JAN 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03193.x
Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA
Issue

Journal of Fish Biology
Special Issue: The Current Status of Elasmobranchs: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation
Volume 80, Issue 5, pages 1749–1764, April 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Carlson, J. K., Hale, L. F., Morgan, A. and Burgess, G. (2012), Relative abundance and size of coastal sharks derived from commercial shark longline catch and effort data. Journal of Fish Biology, 80: 1749–1764. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03193.x
- †
Present address: Tree of Life Woodworking and Design, P. O. Box 454, Belfast, ME 04915, U.S.A.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 APR 2012
- Article first published online: 18 JAN 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- catch per unit effort;
- GLM;
- north-west Atlantic observer;
- population status
In the north-west Atlantic Ocean, stock assessments conducted for some commercially harvested coastal sharks indicate declines from 64 to 80% with respect to virgin population levels. While the status of commercially important species is available, abundance trend information for other coastal shark species in the north-west Atlantic Ocean are unavailable. Using a generalized linear modelling (GLM) approach, a relative abundance index was derived from 1994 to 2009 using observer data collected in a commercial bottom longline fishery. Trends in abundance and average size were estimated for bull shark Carcharhinus leucas, spinner shark Carcharhinus brevipinna, tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier and lemon shark Negaprion brevirostris. Increases in relative abundance for all shark species ranged from 14% for C. brevipinna, 12% for C. leucas, 6% for N. brevirostris and 3% for G. cuvier. There was no significant change in the size at capture over the time period considered for all species. While the status of shark populations should not be based exclusively on abundance trend information, but ultimately on stock assessment models, results from this study provide some cause for optimism on the status of these coastal shark species.

1095-8649/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=aed28a71f63c365dda07a91e8610f5a2abc559f5)
1095-8649/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=836f52ec64f63e7b50f129d4e93fc277d8a3844a)