Beyond the somewhat obvious deduction that the present subdivision of the genus is ill-founded, it must be admitted that no clear conclusion can be drawn from the facts adduced. All that is claimed is that they justify an appeal to those to whom specimens are available of species not adequately described to re-examine them and provide the information upon which a revision of the genus may be founded.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.