A novel cinnamic acid derivative that inhibits Cdc25 dual-specificity phosphatase activity
Article first published online: 26 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00086.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Aoyagi, Y., Masuko, N., Ohkubo, S., Kitade, M., Nagai, K., Okazaki, S., Wierzba, K., Terada, T., Sugimoto, Y. and Yamada, Y. (2005), A novel cinnamic acid derivative that inhibits Cdc25 dual-specificity phosphatase activity. Cancer Science, 96: 614–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00086.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 26 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 26 AUG 2005
- (Received April 18, 2005/Revised June 24, 2005/Accepted June 25, 2005/Online publication September 5, 2005)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
The Cdc25 dual-specificity phosphatases are key regulators of cell cycle progression through activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdk). Three homologs exist in humans: Cdc25A, Cdc25B, and Cdc25C. Cdc25A and Cdc25B have oncogenic properties and are overexpressed in some types of tumors. Compounds that inhibit Cdc25 dual-specificity phosphatase activity might thus be potent anticancer agents. We screened several hundred compounds in a library using an in vitro phosphatase assay, with colorimetric measurement of the conversion of p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) to p-nitrophenol by the catalytic domain of recombinant human Cdc25, and discovered TPY-835, which inhibits Cdc25A and Cdc25B activity (IC50 = 5.1 and 5.7 µM, respectively). TPY-835 had mixed inhibition kinetics for Cdc25A and Cdc25B. TPY-835 caused cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase in human lung cancer cells (A549 and SBC-5) but not cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase. After treatment with TPY-835, the activation of Cdk2 was suppressed and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein was decreased in SBC-5 cells. In addition, TPY-835 induced an increase of the sub-G1 phase cell population after 48–72 h treatment. The growth inhibitory effects of TPY-835 against cisplatin (CDDP)-, camptothecin- and 5-FU-resistant cell lines are comparable to the growth inhibitory effect on their parental lines, thus indicating that TPY-835 did not show cross-resistance to these cell lines. These results suggest that TPY-835 is a promising candidate for constructing a novel class of antitumor agents that can control the cell cycle progression of cancer cells. (Cancer Sci 2005; 96: 614–619)

1349-7006/asset/cas_centre.gif?v=1&s=11108c6693d2a39ca49ee937260cc26f94293b0d)
1349-7006/asset/cas_right.gif?v=1&s=8b26cd26c2b4c8264011a9ddc0ed1cf4aaee0b20)
