• 1
    Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981; 47: 20714.
  • 2
    Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 20516.
  • 3
    Watanabe H, Yamamoto S, Kunitoh H et al. Tumor response to chemotherapy: The validity and reproducibility of RECIST guidelines in NSCLC patients. Cancer Sci 2003; 94: 101520.
  • 4
    James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 5238.
  • 5
    Sohaib SA, Turner B, Hanson JA et al. CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 117884.
  • 6
    Warren KE, Patronas N, Aikin AA et al. Comparison of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements of childhood brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 14015.
  • 7
    Werner-Wasik M, Xiao Y, Pequignot E et al. Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: Tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT scan-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51: 5661.
  • 8
    Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 5th edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1997.
  • 9
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 15974.
  • 10
    Al-Aynati M, Chen V, Salama S et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127: 5936.
  • 11
    Hagen PJ, Hartmann IJ, Hoekstra OS et al. Comparison of observer variability and accuracy of different criteria for lung scan interpretation. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 73944.
  • 12
    Travis WD, Gal AA, Colby TV et al. Reproducibility of neuroendocrine lung tumor classification. Hum Pathol 1998; 29: 2729.
  • 13
    Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Van Slyke MA et al. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 8514.
  • 14
    Thiesse P, Ollivier L, Di Stefano-Louineau D et al. Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 350714.
  • 15
    Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 257482.