SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Angiogenesis, the process by which new blood vessels are recruited to existing ones, is essential for tumor development. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), which modulates bioavailability of IGF, has been studied for its potential role in angiogenesis during tissue regeneration and cancer development. In this study, we assessed the role of IGFBP-3 in tumor angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) using adenoviral (Ad-BP3) and recombinant (rBP3) IGFBP-3. Using an in vivo orthotopic tongue tumor model, we confirmed that both Ad-BP3 and rBP3 suppress the growth of UMSCC38 HNSCC cells in vivo. Ad-BP3 inhibited vascularization in tongue tumors and chorio-allantoic membrane, and suppressed angiogenesis-stimulating activities in UMSCC38 cells. In HUVECs, Ad-BP3 decreased migration, invasion, and tube formation. rBP3 also suppressed production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in HUVECs and UMSCC38 cells. IGFBP-3-GGG, a mutant IGFBP-3 with loss of IGF binding capacity, suppressed VEGF production. In addition, we found that IGFBP-3 suppressed VEGF expression, even in mouse embryonic fibroblasts from an IGF-1R-null mouse. Finally, we demonstrated that IGFBP-3-GGG inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth to the same degree as wild-type IGFBP-3. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that IGFBP-3 has anti-angiogenic activity in HNSCC, at least in part due to IGF-independent suppression of VEGF production from vascular endothelial cells and cancer cells. (Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 1259–1266)

Angiogenesis is an orchestrated process in which new blood vessels are formed from pre-existing vasculature. Angiogenesis is essential not only for normal development and tissue regeneration of vertebrates but also for the growth, invasion, and metastasis of tumors.[1] Through this process, a solid tumor that has grown larger than 2–3 mm in diameter recruits new blood vessels to gain the necessary oxygen and nutrition supply. Angiogenesis is regulated by many external signaling factors, including pro angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors.[2] Therefore, the intervention of these signaling factors to block tumor angiogenesis has been proposed as a therapeutic approach against a variety of solid tumors. The most widely studied pro-angiogenic factor is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); agents that target this molecule, including monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule kinase inhibitors, have been used in both monotherapy and combination therapy.[3]

The expression of VEGF is regulated by hypoxia-induced factor-1 (HIF-1),[4] a transcription factor that is induced by insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 and 2.[5] Therefore, it was postulated that IGFs promote tumor angiogenesis,[6] at least in part through the induction of HIF-1 and VEGF. In fact, the blocking of IGF signaling inhibited tumor angiogenesis.[7, 8] Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), the major binding protein of IGF in serum IGFBP-3, inhibits the bioactivity of IGF by sequestering it and inhibiting this ligand from binding to its receptor, IGF-1R. Through the inhibition of IGF, IGFBP-3 has a variety of antitumor effects, including anti-angiogenic activity.[9] IGFBP-3 has also been suggested to have IGF-independent anti-angiogenic antitumor activity.[9-13] However, in contrast to these findings, IGFBP-3 has been shown to enhance the stability of IGFs. Several reports have demonstrated that IGFBP-3 has pro-angiogenic effects during normal development and tumor angiogenesis.[9, 14-16] These controversial findings prompted us to perform an in-depth study of the effect of IGFBP-3 on tumor angiogenesis and growth in head and neck squamous cancer cell (HNSCC).

Using in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo model systems with recombinant IGFBP-3 and adenoviral IGFBP-3, we observed that HNSCC tumor angiogenesis and growth were inhibited by overexpression of IGFBP-3. We found that IGFBP-3 was able to suppress VEGF expression in vascular endothelial and HNSCC cells independent of its binding affinity to IGF. This mechanism may explain how IGFBP-3 suppresses tumor angiogenesis.

Materials and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Cell culture, animals, and other reagents

Head and neck squamous cancer cell lines, UMSCC38, SQCC/Y1, TR146, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs; Lonza; Charles City, IA, USA) lines were cultured as previously described.[17, 18] Female athymic nude mice (6 weeks old) and chick eggs were purchased from Harlan-Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, IN, USA) and Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA), respectively. Adenoviruses expressing wild type IGFBP-3 (Ad-BP3) or mutant IGFBP-3 (Ad-BP3-GGG) were established using the plasmids encoding Flag-BP3-wt and Flag-BP3-GGG.[19] The empty virus (Ad-EV) was used as a negative control. Bovine serum albumin, gelatin, and MTT were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). IGF-I and Amicon Ultra-4 concentrator units were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) respectively. Recombinant human IGFBP-3 (rBP3) was a gift from Insmed (Glen Allen, VA, USA). Antibodies for IGFBP-3 VEGF and actin were purchased from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (Webster, TX, USA), Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) respectively.

Orthotopic tongue tumor model and immunohistochemical analysis

After the orthotopic tongue tumor volume reached approximately 30–50mm3 (day 0), mice (= 5) were given intratumoral injections of 1 × 1010 virus particles (1st, 5th, and 9th days per 3–5 days; either Ad-EV, Ad-BP3, or Ad-BP3-GGG) as described elsewhere.[13, 17, 20] To treat the tumor bearing mice with rBP3, the recombinant protein (10 mg/kg in 50 μL PBS) was subcutaneously injected once a week for 3 weeks. For CD31 staining, frozen tumor tissue sections were stained with anti-CD31 antibody from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA, USA; 1:100 dilution). The number of tumor vessels per high-power field was counted by blinded observer.

Chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) assay

The chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) assay was conducted by using 4.5-day-old chick embryos as previously described.[21] This experiment was repeated three times with more than 20 eggs for HNSCC cells in vitro. A cover slip loaded with vehicle or 1 × 1010 particles of Ad-EV or Ad-BP3 with angiogenic factors, including IGF-1 (100 ng), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (100 ng), or VEGF (100 ng), was applied onto the surface of the CAM. After 2 days of incubation, a fat emulsion was injected into the CAM to allow visualization and quantification of the blood vessels.

Migration, invasion, and tube formation assay

The in vitro migration, invasion, and tube formation assays were performed using either uninfected HUVECs or those infected with Ad-EV or Ad-BP3 as described elsewhere.[17, 22, 23] Briefly, HUVECs were uninfected (con) or infected with Ad-BP3 or Ad-EV (10 and 50 pfu/cell) for 1 day, and the number of living cells was counted using 0.4% trypan blue. Only cells with viability ≥ 95% were used for further experiments. For the migration assay and invasion assays, we used 24-well cell culture chamber inserts (6.5 mm diameter, 8 μm pore size; Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) coated with a 0.1 mg/mL collagen type IV (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and Matrigel (BD Labware, Bedford, MA, USA), respectively. For the tube formation assay, HUVECs treated with rBP3, conditioned medium (CM) or infected with Ad-EV or Ad-BP3 were seeded onto presolidified Matrigels. After 8 h, the cells were fixed and photographed by microscopy. Three branch points were considered to indicate positive tube formation and scored by a blinded observer. Each experiment was conducted at least twice with three sets per experiment. The average values of representative results were graphed.[17, 23]

Cell proliferation assay

To test the effects of IGFBP-3 to the growth factor supported HUVEC cell proliferation and survival, HUVECs (1 × 104) were incubated in endothelial growth medium (EGM; Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA) supplemented with bFGF, VEGF or IGF. The HUVEC cells were infected with EV or Ad BP3 and cultured for 3 days and then followed by MTT assay. Six replicate wells were used for each analysis, and at least three independent experiments were performed.

Chick aortic arch and Mouse Matrigel plug assays

The chick aortic arch assay was performed as described previously.[24] Briefly, the aortic ring arches of 14-day-old chick embryos were dissected and placed on a 10-μL Matrigel drop in 48-well plates, and EBM and CM were added. Average sprouting was measured with Axiovision 4.3 software (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA) after the plates had been photographed under a stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss) and scored by a blinded observer. Each condition was replicated in six wells, and the experiment was repeated three times. The in vivo mouse Matrigel plug assay was performed as described elsewhere[22, 23] using UMSCC38 cells preinfected with Ad-BP3, Ad-BP3-GGG, or Ad-EV (50 pfu/cell). Each treatment group included 7–10 mice. After 7 days, the Matrigel plugs were excised and the level of vessel formation was evaluated by determining hemoglobin content as previously described.[24]

RT-PCR analysis

RNA was purified from UMSCC38, HUVECs, and R- cells (mouse embryonic fibroblasts from an IGF-1R-null mouse, gifted from Dr Basergga) that had been infected with Ad-EV or Ad-BP3 or treated with rBP3 for 2 days. Semiquantitative RT-PCR products were separated on agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining under ultraviolet transillumination. The primer sequences were as follows: (sense) 5′-CCATG AACTT TCTGC TGTCT T-3′ and (antisense) 5′-ATCGC ATCAG GGGCA CACAG-3′ for human VEGF; (sense) 5′-GGACC CTGGC TTTAC TGC-3′ and (antisense) 5′-CGGGC TTGGC GATTT AG-3′ for mouse VEGF: 5′-GGTG AAGGT CGGTG TGAAC GGATT T-3′ (sense) and 5′-AATGC CAAAG TTGTC ATGGA TGACC-3′ for human GAPDH: 5′-TAAGG GCATC CTGGG CTACA CT-3′ (sense) and 5′-TTACT CCTTG GAGGA GGCCA TGTAG G-3′ for mouse GAPDH.

Statistical analysis

The data acquired from the MTT assay were analyzed using ANOVA in GraPhad Prism (La Jolla, CA, USA) or Student's t-test. All means from multiple replicates (three to 20 samples) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using SAS software (release 8.02; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance of tumor growth was analyzed by ANOVA using SAS. In all statistical analyses, two-sided P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

IGFBP-3 inhibits in vivo tumor growth

We have previously demonstrated that delivery of IGFBP-3 via a recombinant adenovirus (Ad-BP3) is effective in inhibiting the growth of non small cell lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by inducing apoptosis.[13] In the current study, we tested the effects of Ad-BP3 on the growth of UMSCC38 HNSCC orthotopic tongue tumors established in athymic nude mice. We have previously shown that Ad-BP3 induces expression of IGFBP-3 in the tumor.[13] We further confirmed that the virus induced expression of IGFBP3 protein in HUVECs and secretion of the protein from the infected cells (Fig. S1). Injection of Ad-BP3 into the tumors completely suppressed the growth of these tumors without significant effects on the body weights of the mice (Fig. 1A). Because the levels of adenovirus-expressing IGFBP-3 can be much higher than the levels observed under real-life conditions, we confirmed the antitumor effect of IGFBP-3 using recombinant proteins (rBP3). Growth of UMSCC38-derived orthotopic tongue tumors was also inhibited significantly by treatment with rBP3 (Fig. 1B).

image

Figure 1. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) suppresses tumor growth of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) in vivo. UMSCC38-derived orthotopic tongue tumor growth was examined after treatment with Ad-BP3 or Ad-EV (A) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or recombinant IGFBP-3 (10 mg/kg) (B). The relative tumor volume (the starting tumor volume was set to 100%) was expressed as the mean (%) from five mice in each group ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The body weight of mice was also measured. *< 0.05; **< 0.01 vs. control Ad-EV injected tumors.

Download figure to PowerPoint

IGFBP-3 suppresses angiogenic activities in HNSCC and vascular endothelial cells

We determined Ad-BP3's effect on angiogenesis in UMSCC38-derived tumors. Anti-CD31 staining of the Ad-BP3-treated tumors showed significantly decreased micro vessel density compared with those injected with Ad-EV (Fig. 2A). We clarified whether IGFBP-3's effects on tumor angiogenesis were caused by the direct effect of IGFBP-3 on vascular endothelial cells. The CAM assay revealed that Ad-BP3 (50 pfu/egg) significantly inhibited IGF-, bFGF-, and VEGF-stimulated neovascularization in chicken embryos with no signs of thrombosis, hemorrhage, or egg lethality (Fig. 2B). To test whether IGFBP-3's inhibition of tumor angiogenesis was also caused by the suppression of angiogenic potential in cancer cells, we examined the angiogenic effect of conditioned medium (CM) from UMSCC38 cells pre-treated with the recombinant viruses. The pro-angiogenic effect of the cancer cells was inhibited by pretreatment with Ad-BP3, as demonstrated by diminished ex vivo chick aortic sprout growth (Fig. 2C). These findings suggest that overexpression of IGFBP-3 inhibits the angiogenic potential of vascular endothelial and cancer cells.

image

Figure 2. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) suppresses tumor-associated or growth factor-induced angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro. (A) Microvessel density of UMSCC38 orthotopic tongue tumors 10 days after injection with Ad-BP3 or Ad-EV. The number of CD31-immunoreactive vessels per field was counted after immunohistochemical analysis, = 5. (B) Chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) assay for angiogenesis in chicken embryos (= 20) treated with vehicle (Con), Ad-EV or Ad-BP3 in the presence of 50 ng/mL of IGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The blood vessels were scored blindly and relative scores to the control are shown as%. Independent experiments were repeated three times; the values are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (C) Effect of CM from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) lines infected with Ad-EV or Ad-BP3 on chick aortic sprouting, = 5. The results represent the mean ± SEM. *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. the control group.

Download figure to PowerPoint

IGFBP-3 inhibits migration, invasion, and tube formation of vascular endothelial cells

To investigate the mechanisms underlying anti-angiogenic activities of IGFBP-3, we examined the effects of IGFBP-3 on vascular endothelial cells. We found that the migration, invasion and tube formation of HUVECs were significantly inhibited by Ad-BP3 (Fig. 3A), whereas no detectable cyototoxic activity of Ad-BP3 was observed in the same condition (data not shown). We next tested the effects of IGFBP-3 on proliferation of HUVECs. The treatment of HUVECs with 5–50 pfu/cell of Ad-BP3 for 3 days significantly suppressed cell proliferation induced by IGF, bFGF, or VEGF (Fig. 3B).

image

Figure 3. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) inhibits angiogenesis by acting directly on vascular endothelial cells. (A) Inhibitory effects of IGFBP-3 on migration, invasion, and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). (B) Proliferation of HUVECs supplemented with pro-angiogenic growth factors was inhibited by IGFBP-3. Ad-BP3-infected HUVEC culture was supplemented with the indicated growth factors, and the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed 3 days later. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) with eight replicates per experiment. Control cells were not treated with the virus, n = 5. *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ***< 0.001.

Download figure to PowerPoint

IGFBP-3 suppresses VEGF expression in vascular endothelial and HNSCC cells

Because one of the most potent and widely investigated activators of angiogenesis is VEGF, we asked whether Ad-BP3 inhibited angiogenesis by modulating VEGF expression. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that Ad-BP3 treatment in fact decreased the mRNA levels of VEGF in UMSCC38 cells and HUVECs (Fig. 4A). The CM from Ad-BP3-treated UMSCC38 cells also showed a dose-dependent decrease in the levels of VEGF protein (Fig. 4B). However, the same doses of Ad-EV induced an increased expression of VEGF, probably through the activation of AKT by the RGD motif of capsid.[25] Because the adenoviral system induces large amounts of IGFBP-3 expression, we also tested the effects of rBP3 at doses of 0.1–10 μg/mL; these doses are below, within, and above the physiological range of IGFBP-3.[26] rBP3 at doses greater than 5 μg/mL markedly decreased VEGF expression in three HNSCC cell lines, UMSCC38, SQCC/Y1 and TR146, and HUVEC (Fig. 4C). The same amount of rBP3 also decreased the tube formation of HUVEC (Fig. 4D, left). In addition, CM from UMSCC38 cells that had been incubated in serum- and drug-free medium for 1 day after a 2-day treatment with rBP3 at doses greater than 5 μg/mL stimulated tube formation of HUVECs significantly less than CM from vehicle-treated cells (control) (Fig. 4D, right). However, we were unable to observe detectable changes in these angiogenic parameters in UMSCC38 cells and HUVECs treated with rBP3 at doses of 0.1–1.0 μg/mL. These findings suggest that the anti-angiogenic effects of IGFBP-3 that we observed were physiological and pharmacological effects of IGFBP-3.

image

Figure 4. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) suppresses expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in UMSCC38 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVECs). Semi-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (A) and Western blot analysis (B) on VEGF in the mRNAs and conditioned medium from UMSCC38 HNSCCs. (C) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of VEGF and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression in UMSCC38 cells and HUVECs treated with the indicated doses of rBP3. (D) Tube formation of HUVECs was inhibited by treatment with rBP3 (left). Angiogenic activity in conditioned medium from UMSCC38 cells after rBP3 treatment was tested by tube formation (right). The control was set to 100%, bars, standard deviations (SDs). Recombinant human IGFBP-3, rBP3. *< 0.05; ***< 0.001.

Download figure to PowerPoint

IGFBP-3 suppresses the expression of VEGF through IGF-independent mechanisms

Insulin-like growth factor-1 is known to induce VEGF synthesis at the levels of transcription and translation.[27] We investigated whether the effect of IGFBP-3 on VEGF expression is IGF-dependent. To this end, we tested the effects of a mutated adenoviral IGFBP-3 (Ad-BP3-GGG). This mutant has glycine substitutions at three residues that are critical for IGF-1 binding (i.e., Ile[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]Gly56, Leu[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]Gly80, and Leu[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]Gly81).[19] We found that Ad-BP3-GGG also suppressed VEGF production in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). To confirm the IGF-independent inhibitory effects of Ad-BP3 on VEGF mRNA expression, we used R cells, mouse embryonic fibroblast cells that do not have IGF-1 receptor (Fig. 5B). IGFBP-3-expressing virus efficiently inhibited the expression of VEGF in the R- cells, strongly suggesting that the action of IGFBP-3 on the suppression of VEGF expression is through IGF-1-independent mechanisms.

image

Figure 5. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) suppresses expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) through IGF-independent mechanisms. (A) Western blot of UMSCC38 lysates and conditioned medium (CM) after infection with indicated doses of Ad-EV or Ad-BP3-GGG. (B) Semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of VEGF and IGFBP-3 mRNA expression in R cells infected with indicated doses of Ad-EV or Ad-BP3.

Download figure to PowerPoint

IGFBP-3 inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis through an IGF-independent mechanism

We finally investigated whether the IGF-independent anti-angiogenic activities of IGFBP-3 can restrict tumor growth in vivo using Ad-BP3 and Ad-BP3-GGG. We found that the anti-angiogenic and antitumor activities of Ad-BP3-GGG were similar to those of Ad-BP3. Matrigel plugs containing Ad-BP3-GGG-infected cells and plugs containing Ad-BP3-infected cells had significantly less hemoglobin levels compared with the plugs containing Ad-EV-infected cells (< 0.01; Fig. 6A). Furthermore, Ad-BP3 and Ad-BP3-GGG both induced significant regression of UMSCC38 orthotopic tongue tumors to a similar degree when injected intratumorally (Fig. 6B). Collectively, these results demonstrate that IGFBP-3 has IGF-independent anti-angiogenic/antitumor activity in HNSCC.

image

Figure 6. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-independent inhibition of tumor growth and angiogenesis is mediated by IGFBP-3. (A) Insulin-like growth factor-independent tumor angiogenesis inhibition by IGFBP-3. Matrigel plug assay was done using UMSCC38 cells pretreated with viruses. Hemoglobin amounts (μg per 100 mg of dissected Matrigel tumors) were measured. Results are the mean from six tumors (except control; Matrigel only, = 3; ± standard error of the mean [SEM]). **< 0.01. (B) UMSCC38-derived orthotopic tongue tumor growth was measured 7 and 11 days after intratumoral injection of Ad-BP3, Ad-BP3-GGG, Ad-EV or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The starting tumor volume was set to 100% (±standard error [SE]). **< 0.01; = 5 for each group.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

In this report, we have demonstrated the anti-angiogenic antitumor effects of IGFBP-3 in HNSCC: (i) inhibition of endothelial cell migration and invasion; (ii) IGF-independent inhibition of VEGF production in vascular endothelial and cancer cells; and (iii) IGF-independent anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor growth in vivo.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, one of the most abundant proteins in serum, has been known to regulate the IGF axis, which is essential for survival and metabolism of cancer cells in a hypoxic and energy-limited environment.[28] Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 has also been shown to inhibit vascular endothelial cell survival[18, 29] and induce normalization of tumor vasculature.[30] Based on these functions, IGFBP-3 has been suggested to have anti-angiogenic properties. In support of this notion, IGFBP-3-mediated antitumor activities in a variety of cancer types have been found to involve the suppression of angiogenesis.[17, 18, 29] In the current study, we have shown that overexpression of IGFBP-3 also has anti-angiogenic and antitumor activities in HNSCC. Nevertheless, further research is required to understand mechanisms by which IGFBP-3 regulates angiogenesis.

While investigating the mechanisms that mediate the anti-angiogenic actions of IGFBP-3, we found that IGFBP-3 regulates the expression of VEGF, a potent pro-angiogenic factor. The suppressed expression of this potent pro-angiogenic factor in cancer and vascular endothelial cells may contribute to the inhibition of the blood supply in HNSCC. Based on conventional wisdom, which states that (i) IGFBP-3 regulates cell growth by sequestering free IGF, (ii) IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT signaling plays an important role in angiogenesis by contributing to the expression of a number of pro-angiogenic factors, including VEGF;[31-33] and (iii) more than 80% of circulating IGF binds to IGFBP-3, it is possible that the observed inhibitory effects of IGFBP-3 on VEGF expression could have been conducted solely through IGF-dependent mechanisms. However, a number of studies have indicated IGF-independent antitumor activities of IGFBP-3.[19, 34] Recently, we have demonstrated that several angiogenic factors, including bFGF and platelet-derived growth factor, are regulated by IGFBP-3 through IGF-independent mechanisms. These previous findings and our current in vitro and in vivo data showed that (i) IGFBP-3 inhibited angiogenesis induced by bFGF and VEGF, as well as IGF; (ii) both Ad-BP3 and rBP3 suppressed VEGF expression in UMSCC38 cells, HUVECs, and R cells; and (iii) wild-type IGFBP-3 and mutant IGFBP-3 lacking IGF-binding affinity both revealed similar levels of inhibitory effects on VEGF expression, tumor angiogenesis and growth of UMSCC38 HNSCC tumors; these findings suggest that the ability of IGFBP-3 to regulate tumor angiogenesis and growth are mediated through IGF-independent mechanisms.

However, recent reports have suggested that the effect of IGFBP-3 on angiogenesis is more complicated than what is described here. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 has been shown to promote vascular regrowth after vascular destruction in vivo.[15] Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 has also been shown to direct endothelial progenitor cells to differentiate into endothelial cells and to increase cell migration and capillary tube formation,[14] especially after vascular injury.[16] Findings reported by Granata et al. showed that IGFBP-3 induced angiogenesis in vitro through the expression of pro-angiogenic genes, such as VEGF,[9] in human endothelial cells, and that IGF signaling was essential for the pro-angiogenic activity of IGFBP-3. Therefore, it is interesting that the same molecule, IGFBP-3, shows opposing activities in regulating angiogenesis under very similar experimental conditions. It has been shown that circulating levels of IGFBP-3 in adults are approximately 2–7 μg/mL;[26] the amount of recombinant IGFBP-3 protein used in this previous study was 1 μg/mL.[9] However, we noted in our study that at doses of 0.1–1.0 μg/mL, recombinant IGFBP-3 had no detectable effect on VEGF expression or tube formation, whereas at doses greater than 5 μg/mL, rBP3 inhibited both VEGF expression and tube formation well. Therefore, it is likely that treatment with IGFBP-3 at greater than the physiological concentration inhibits VEGF expression and angiogenesis in vascular endothelial and HNSCC cells, leading to the suppression of tumor growth that we observed in this study. These data suggest that IGFBP-3 treatment is a promising approach for anti-angiogenic antitumor therapy in HNSCC.

In summary, our data suggest that IGF-independent actions of IGFBP-3 contribute to its anti-angiogenic antitumor activity in HNSCC by suppressing VEGF expression. However, it is possible that other secreted factors with specific effects on tumor angiogenesis may have been modulated by IGFBP-3 treatment. Our findings clearly showed the ability of IGFBP-3 to inhibit VEGF, a potent angiogenic factor, and to suppress tumor angiogenesis and growth. However, given the possibility that (i) IGFBP-3 could work as both an inducer and suppressor of VEGF expression;[5, 35-37] (ii) reduced tumor vascularization following anti-angiogenic therapy could induce hypoxia and, thus, promote the spread of cancer cells toward a more oxygenated environment;[38] and (iii) anti-angiogenic therapies could induce acquired resistance through other growth factor-induced angiogenesis,[39] extensive research, including studies of how IGFBP-3 regulates angiogenesis, is warranted to assess the therapeutic effect of IGFBP-3 before performing clinical trials.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST), Republic of Korea (No. 2011-0017639), the Global Core Research Center (GCRC) grant (No. 2011-0035681) from NRF, MEST, Republic of Korea, National Institutes of Health grant R01 CA100816, the Converging Research Center Program (No. 2011-K000975) from MEST, Republic of Korea (H-Y. Lee).

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information
FilenameFormatSizeDescription
cas2301-sup-0001-figureS1.tifimage/tif208K Fig. S1. The expression of IGFBP-3 virus in HUVEC.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.